Skip to comments.Time for a Special Prosecutor to Investigate Obama's IRS Coverup
Posted on 05/22/2013 4:33:28 PM PDT by Kaslin
WASHINGTON - "Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive."
This ancient admonition, commonly attributed to William Shakespeare but actually the work of Sir Walter Scott, now applies to how Barack Obama's White House has been in a full coverup mode over the widening IRS scandal.
One week after the bombshell story broke that the tax agency has been targeting conservative groups with extra, delay-lengthening scrutiny over their applications for tax-exempt status during the 2011-2012 election cycle, we find out that the details were known at the highest levels of the White House.
Moreover, we're asked to believe that Obama's chief of staff, Denis McDonough -- who talks to his boss daily to keep him informed about what's going on -- and White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler, both of whom knew about the inspector general's audit in April, never said a word about it to the president.
Former Mississippi governor Haley Barbour, a veteran of many political wars, said that if McDonough didn't tell the president about a scandal that was going to fall on him like a ton of bricks, he had no business being chief of staff.
Barbour thinks the Justice Department has no credibility to get to the bottom of this scandal and that this is a job for an independent special prosecutor. The White House's "story keeps changing," he said. Does it ever.
At the outset, the White House characterized the abuse-riddden, political scandal as merely a bureaucratic snafu in what was described as an overworked, budget-stretched IRS office in Cincinnati, Ohio, and nothing more than that.
Then it was revealed that the IRS's egregious demands for Constitutionally-protected information -- names of the groups' donors and even speeches group leaders made -- came from IRS offices from California to Washington, D.C.
President Obama's spokesman Jay Carney maintained last week that no one in the White House knew about the abuses. Then on Monday he revealed to a stunned White House press corps that officials in the West Wing not only knew about the investigation but in some cases knew what the inspector general's report found.
So in the space of one week, the White House's truth-challenged story went from a field office in Cincinnati to a nationwide IRS inquisition of conservative tea party groups to the door step of the president's office.
Not only did Ruemmler tell White House chief of staff McDonough and other White House officials about the IRS findings a month ago, she maintained that the scandal's details shouldn't be reported to Obama.
The flimsy, hard-to-believe reasons Ruemmler gave for supposedly hiding the length and breadth of this unfolding scandal from Obama are hard to swallow. It was because the IG's report was not finalized at that point, she argued, and he could not be seen interfering with the investigation until it had been completed.
Obviously, this gave Obama presidential deniability to hide behind. Last week, he said he first heard about the IRS scandal when the story broke in the news media. But the critically important question that a bunch of House and Senate investigating committees are preparing to ask is this: What did the president know and when did he know it?
There are lots of reasons to be suspicious of the White House's explanations thus far and even to conclude that a coverup was underway. The day before Carney revealed for the first time that senior White House officials knew all about this, senior presidential adviser Dan Pfeiffer said on a number of TV interviews Sunday that the White House didn't know about the IG report until it was released last week.
Earlier, Carney had told the press that Ruemmler knew "only about the fact that the IG was finishing a review" of the IRS abuses that he labels as merely "inappropriate."
The White House's previous claims that no one really knew about the details of the ongoing investigation is laughable on its face. People knew about this a long time ago elsewhere in the administration.
Treasury Deputy Secretary Neal Wolin and other political appointees in the administration were among those who knew about the IG's investigation last year. And it was long known on Capitol Hill, too.
J. Russell George, Treasury's Inspector General for Tax Administration, wrote to Rep. Darrell Issa, who chairs the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, in July of 2012 to brief him on the investigation.
"Communications between the Treasury Department and the White House also have turned out to be broader than initially acknowledged," according to a Washington Post story Tuesday. "At one point, Mark Patterson, the Treasury chief of staff, talked about the timing of the report with Mark Childress, deputy White House chief of staff," the Post reported.
As for Ruemmler's claim that the president could not be told about the investigation because he could not interfere with an ongoing audit, experts reject that specious notion out of hand.
Joseph Newman, chief spokesman for the Project on Government Oversight, sees no legal barriers that would prevent the White House counsel from telling the president of an upcoming audit. "Once the president knows about some wrongdoing, he shouldn't be prevented from taking remedial action," Newman said.
This is a scandal of enormous proportions and the worst of it, as is often the case, is the coverup. Little more than 10 days ago, the White House was telling us that Obama's legal counsel only knew that an audit was conducted, but knew nothing about its details.
Now we know that she, the chief of staff and others in authority around the president knew all about it.
Does anyone really, truly to believe Obama was kept in the dark about this?
A large majority of Americans, including 59 percent of independents, believe that the IRS "deliberately harassed conservative groups by targeting them for extra scrutiny," according to a Post poll Tuesday. Three-fourths of those polled called the IRS actions "inappropriate." How about illegal?
It should be clear by now that the Obama White House has been engaged in another coverup that cries out for the enactment of a special prosecutor. The sooner the better.
Not so fast. What if the Dems want a SP just to try to make it go away? Who appoints the SP? All they have to do is put a crony in place. We might be better off without one, at least for the time being.
A special prosecutor is just what they want. Who’s going to appoint him? Holder.
Also, this will then go out of the news cycle, drag on forever, they’ll marginalize and ridicule the prosecutor, and nothing will happen in the long run (remember poor Ken Starr).
Get some good information and get a regular prosecutor to file charges against them. It’s going to be hard unless they get rid of Holder, but he’s involved up to his eyebrows in this and he’s got to go.
Rep. Trey Gowdy should be appointed special prosecuter in this case and all the other scandals.
They need a specialized special prosecutor. They need somebody well versed in RICO, conspiracy and strong arming, and they need to not get sidetracked and focus in laser like on the IRS chain of command and knowledge.
Otherwise, it will just be a 3 year calamity.
Perhaps they can get a prosecutor that will work with the committee on containing the inevitable info war that they’ll start.
He would be perfect for it
Good picture of the liar in chief.
Of course the orders for the IRS attacks on the TEA party came from Obama.
Of course the orders for FAST AND FURIOUS came directly from Obama.
Of course the lies about Benghazi came directly from Obama.
Of course it was Obama that blocked the military from defending Benghazi after the Muslim terrorist attack started.
Obama is a liar unequaled in American history. The US government has been lying to you for decades but the Muslim clown named Obama has taken it up a couple of levels. The video PROVES the government lied about the biggest mystery in American history. The average American will wait for the press to tell them what to think.
Why don’t tea party groups and individual conservatives sue the IRS,Obama, that church lady, U.S. gov etc. for violating their civil rights which the IRS did and Obama did. they have been unjustly targeted by IRS for what for wanting smaller government for being middle America
Something needs to be done. Issa got rolled today by Lerner.
All I see on TV is her self serving video on news channels.
did you hear that Issa is calling her back to Congress?
Rule number 1 check Drudge before trying to unfairly bash Republicans
Maybe I’m having a bad hair day but, what law was broken and what the sanctions attached to it.
What they did was unconstitutional but, there no punishment that I am aware for doing it.
I can bash Rino’s any time I chose punk.
Lying to Congress is a Federal crime. Gov’t employees influencing elections is a violation of the Hatch Act, not to mention civil rights violations. Engaging in a conspiracy to commit those crimes, or to conceal them, is also illegal.
NO! No SP, then everyone lawyers up and clams up and it leaves the news cycle until after the 2014 elections.
I want Trey Gowdy in Congress investigating this and in the news headlines day after day. Drip, drip, drip.
LOL what a moron.go back to your crying you ridiculous democrat
you are on ignore
+1. Special prosecutors are where Democrat scandals go to die. This scandal would disappear totally, as no one in Congress or the media would be able to dig further (”interfere in an ongoing investigation”). And then, sometime after the 2016 elections, the special prosecutor would quietly release his findings, which would be a total whitewash, and then it would be too late to ever do anything more about it. Bad idea.
You are a dumb punk who does not know what you are talking about.
Even Rush called Issa’s hearing today weak. And when Mark Levin returns
he will call out Issa for his performance today and praise Gowdy.
And BTW, Issa was just on Hannity. Issa said he “MAY” recall Lerner.
May is not a definite word.
Well, those I kinda figure would be “as a result of process”.
What is the crime for targeting our brothers and sisters for merely being in the opposition ?