Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Broke no laws, IRS official says _ then takes 5th
AP ^ | 5/22

Posted on 05/22/2013 7:09:40 PM PDT by Arthurio

WASHINGTON (AP) -- At the center of a political storm, an Internal Revenue Service supervisor whose agents targeted conservative groups swore Wednesday she did nothing wrong, broke no laws and never lied to Congress. Then she refused to answer lawmakers' further questions, citing her Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate herself.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 05/22/2013 7:09:40 PM PDT by Arthurio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

Unless she has in fact broken a law, she has no right to invoke the 5th Amendment. It is logically impossible to incriminate oneself with respect to actions that were not crimes.


2 posted on 05/22/2013 7:12:21 PM PDT by sourcery (If true=false, then there would be no constraints on what is possible. Hence, the world exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio
After the crap she pulled at the FEC and now this, this ho needs to be arrested. GIVE HER A REASON TO PLEAD THE 5TH!!!!
3 posted on 05/22/2013 7:13:09 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (If you think ObamaCare is a train wreck, wait until you see the amnesty bill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

I’ve heard from several sources that, by making the statement, she had already begun testifying and it was too late to take the Fifth. Any legal minds out there who can say whether that’s true?


4 posted on 05/22/2013 7:22:13 PM PDT by Steve0113 (I miss having a president who loves this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve1789

I’m not a legal eagle, but I spotted several “rental lawyer experts” state that she screwed up by trying to proclaim her innocence and then trying to take the fifth. They are calling her back and if she doesn’t answer the questions charge her with contempt.


5 posted on 05/22/2013 7:24:55 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (Wonder if Syria or Libya will send arms to US Blue States when Obama goes Assad?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Steve1789
Don't forget, after making her statement she invoked the 5th, then invoked it again, THEN she answered a question from Issa, then she left.
6 posted on 05/22/2013 7:29:08 PM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

Libya is the main effort.


7 posted on 05/22/2013 7:29:08 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

I broke no law and thats all I’ve got to say on the matter. :-)


8 posted on 05/22/2013 7:30:07 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

Don’t forget the document Issa showed her........she looked stunned.


9 posted on 05/22/2013 7:30:58 PM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Toespi

That’s what I’m talking about. She answered his question about it after TWICE invoking the 5th.


10 posted on 05/22/2013 7:36:09 PM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All

Here is the video of her statement

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=rxauVtK59xc

Here is what transpired immediately AFTER her statement

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2i_WconfaVM


11 posted on 05/22/2013 7:39:14 PM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Roccus
On the second video at 5:30 Issa suggests immunity negotiations
12 posted on 05/22/2013 7:43:07 PM PDT by Selene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Selene

Yup.
IMO, her testimony could fry bigger fish.


13 posted on 05/22/2013 7:45:44 PM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

When you hook a fish, reel it it. Rebate and try for a bigger one even if you have to use the smaller on for bait.


14 posted on 05/22/2013 8:03:20 PM PDT by Pfesser (I miss President Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

I read a legal expert on this today who says in this situation she can answer all the questions she wants and still stop answering whenever she wants.

This isn’t a trial, and she is not charged with a crime.

However, the irony does burn.


15 posted on 05/22/2013 8:04:37 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (....Let It Burn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

16 posted on 05/22/2013 8:13:38 PM PDT by Route395
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

But seriously, is targeting a particular set of groups by the IRS illegal?


17 posted on 05/22/2013 8:14:43 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthurio

The right was brought to this country by ‘Puritans’ understandably unhappy with having been subjected to torture and forced confessions.
Strange as it may seem, it was contained within the Magna Carta, and was pretty much ignored, particularly by the Tudors.
I adhere to and support all ten of the original Bill of Rights. Without it, I wouldn’t be surprised to learn this bunch had been racking Christians.


18 posted on 05/22/2013 8:14:53 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Selene

19 posted on 05/22/2013 8:37:14 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
But seriously, is targeting a particular set of groups by the IRS illegal?

I have been thinking about that issue as well. They can, and should, target certain groups.

Those groups would be ones who HISTORICALLY and OBVIOUSLY are trying to scam the government. Like Obama's UNCLE.

However, since they couldn't justify whom they WERE targeting, they had to lie about doing it.

20 posted on 05/22/2013 8:42:49 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson