You can’t legislate friendship, camaraderie, or support. And trying to get through the Boy Scout ranks without these is not going to happen.
If a boy is homosexual, and doesn’t make an issue of it, it will likely be ignored, unless he cannot control his behavior.
However, if he does make an issue of it, he is introducing an extraneous topic to scouting. The boys are there to learn to be Boy Scouts, not for other purposes. The more he insists on the other boys focusing on his aberration, the more they are going to resent it.
The problem with your solution is that I am 100% certain that Scoutmasters will now be told to be inclusive and tolerant and weloming and make sure the atmosphere in scouting is inclusive and tolerant and welcoming and any boys not being that will be accused of homophobia. Silence about fagdom is now considered homophobia. Boys will be FORCED to be inclusive - “John, why don’t you want to share your tent with gay Mikey? Are you homophobic? Maybe you’re afraid you’re gay? You realize there’s nothing wrong with that!”
The boys who are supposedly “gay” will no doubt at all make a BF deal out of it, and be pushed by their two daddies or two mommies to do so, and anything that doesn’t suit them will be Law Suit Time.
The BSA of are OVER. Finito. End of the line.
Oh, and here’s my prediction: next, they fags will want the inclusion of “transgendered” boys/girls/etc AND “gay” Scoutmasters.
It's probably been that way since scouting began: Don't ask, don't tell, in effect. But when they insist that openly gay members must be allowed, they've changed a basic assumption about the BSA: that it isn't about sex, period.
Now they've made it about sex for boys starting at 10 1/2 years old. It's a stupid move from any viewpoint, except as a first step toward gaining acceptance of gay scout leaders.