Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Look at what the folks who have fundamental units named after them had to do by hand. The did math by hand, as a matter of course, that the average technically educated person simply cannot do.

Even as late as the 1960’s - and I’ve had occasion to review many research papers from that era - folks were much better at math and the organized thinking that is required to successfully accomplish tough math problems makes for a more measurable intellect then as compared with today.

So I’d say, the way we measure IQ can put greater emphasis on the organized brain capable of doing complex mathematics by hand - and that is not as prevalent today as it was 100 years ago. Being able to do math in your head or by hand DOES mean you are smarter by any measurement in my opinion.


27 posted on 05/23/2013 5:45:20 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RFEngineer

I would dispute that. I was classically trained - all my math examinations were designed so that they could be done without a calculator. All you needed was a pencil.


37 posted on 05/23/2013 5:52:10 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: RFEngineer
I'm trying to wrap my head around the AKS proof this week. Agrawal, Kayal, and Saxena were pretty smart folks.

I'm not firm on the math quite yet.

I'm not using a pencil. I'm using Perl code and a spreadsheet to try to come to grips with the fundamental core of it.

Doing arithmetic with a pencil would NOT help in my quest.

/johnny

43 posted on 05/23/2013 5:59:33 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson