Skip to comments.Secrecy, Heavy-Handed Tactics Reported at Boy Scouts Meeting
Posted on 05/24/2013 6:32:58 AM PDT by chessplayer
click here to read article
What’s a boy scout?
Now that some boy scouts will be scouting for boys.
Lavender mafia “ribbon bully” tactics. The Gaystapo in full effect.
It is the sexual deviants who are the bullies.
IMHO.... Too bad but it’s about money. Either let them in...or they’ll never get any funding or privileges anywhere.
"Chickenhawk" was erroneously used to slur "arm chair" supporters of the second Gulf War.
A chickenhawk is an adult male who cruises for boys.
It was the same prank pulled by liberals when they called patriotic men, women, and children "teabaggers".
All dashed to smithereens . . . sodomites win again . . . morality and decency lose big time.
I will never again support Boy Scouts in any way.
A boy doesn’t have the skills to know whether he is gay or not. Most of the gay kids are just products of a bad home life. When one of my Scouts announces he is gay (one has), I just assume they want attention.
Michael Moore has long encouraged leftwing activists to do the same to the NRA leadership (buy a "membership" and vote for a liberal takeover).
The "camel" sticking its nose under the "tent" isn't looking to "share a common vision". It is an infestation of subversive elements.
In other news... the military has just announced that they have had an inordinate number of homosexuals raping other men....
Oh boy, just wait until we have Boy/Girl Scouts.
And does little sissy Johnny get a rainbow patch for keeping the bathhouse clean?
In Californication now, you may not counsel a “homosexual questioning youth” to reconsider heterosexuality (at least until age 18).
The faggot lobby can pressure and seduce the boys and girls all they want to engage in “sexual expression”.
The State is corrupting children in the name of counterculture revolution.
Parental rights are on the wane.
Parents only have a financial and legal representation obligation to their offspring now.
I have yet to read a coherent account of the voting process and the results. It must be a secret or something. One article said the policy was changed by ‘more than 60% of local Scout leaders’ who were there to vote, but neglected to say what % of local Scout leaders were there.
Does anyone know the details of the vote?
It’s really about the radical leftists’ long march through the institutions. By forcing admission of gay scouts they are causing conservatives to abandon the organization. This leaves it in the hands of the radicals who want to transform it into Stalin’s Young Pioneers. Look for the scouts to make multiple high-profile appearances at the White House and in other far left enclaves. They have colored another American organization for their own purposes.
Queers in the Boy Scouts. Whodda thunk? Another indicator how far this country has fallen into the sewer.
My question: will a girl, who believes she was born in a boy’s body be allowed to join the Girl Scouts?
I doubt that this restriction applies to any but public employees.
The rest of your post is on point.