>>Dick Durbin: Are bloggers and tweeters entitled to constitutional protection?
So this is how America ends? With lifetime politicians “deciding” who has Constitutional rights?
Dick Turban. Get the mental picture?
After all, rights come from the government don’t they?/Sarc with a capital S.
this administration has shown us all how they regard the law and think we should be run more like a dictatorship and yet we also have a media which though targeted by this admin they still defend this admin.
If people saw the front pages, heard the facts and understood what the hell is happening to this country then there would be massive protests and calls for Obama and his hench men to step down.
Instead the media covers for them , the sheep goes along with all this queer, radical left, agenda, the black community hasn’t got a clue and the left defends this but they also show their hypocrisy because we all know that if a republican did all of this they would be outraged.
A message to the liberals and all the homosexuals.
You think this is alright because you follow blindly your messiah but you need to ask yourself this.
If the right did this would you still remain silent and defend this?
Hell no and that is why you lot show us why the country is going to crap. You can’t put your bias and voting for a letter aside and think of the country instead and the rule of law.
Or as freedom loving patriots call him....
That’s the headline. You’ve missed Durbin’s mentality. He supports the “media shield law”, not the Constitution.
That’s the Cook County mentality completely. People’s rights are those granted by government. There are no natural rights, only positive rights. Isn’t that communism?
That’s how Cook County and Ill-annoy politicians think. That’s why Obama was such a natural fit there.
There are few as detestable as Little Dick Durbin in CONgress. He hunts for food in sewers.
(H/T Mark Levin for giving Durbin his nickname, which actually comes from the fact that he’s no taller than a rabid kobold.)