Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking: Holder DOJ Went Judge Shopping to Three Different Judges Armed With Criminal Warrants...
Gateway Pundit ^ | May 27, 2013 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 05/27/2013 6:06:40 AM PDT by blueyon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
He needs to go NOW.....with no pension either
1 posted on 05/27/2013 6:06:40 AM PDT by blueyon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blueyon
Holder was just following orders.


2 posted on 05/27/2013 6:08:18 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
He needs to go NOW

Indeed!

3 posted on 05/27/2013 6:08:43 AM PDT by Las Vegas Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]



bump
4 posted on 05/27/2013 6:09:46 AM PDT by GirlShortstop (Every person has a duty to seek and serve the truth. Abp Charles J. Chaput, OFMCap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Wasn’t Lamberth Clinton’s go to guy?


5 posted on 05/27/2013 6:10:36 AM PDT by Wiser now (Socialism does not eliminate poverty, it guarantees it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Wasn’t Royce C. Lamberth the judge who ordered Clinton to release the emails leading up to his impeachment?


6 posted on 05/27/2013 6:10:39 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

This is what Amerika has come to: Criminal Judges following the 3rd Reich Democrats! The law is molded to what they want it to be.


7 posted on 05/27/2013 6:14:27 AM PDT by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

I forgot to click “This is an excerpt.”

The WHOLE ARTICLE can be viewed at: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/05/breaking-holder-doj-went-judge-shopping-to-three-different-judges-armed-with-criminal-warrants-for-james-rosen/


8 posted on 05/27/2013 6:15:04 AM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royce_C._Lamberth


9 posted on 05/27/2013 6:15:20 AM PDT by Fzob (In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

This is wrong information. I looked last week,it was a magistrate under Lamberth’s court. Lamberth is conserative,I would not think they would even go there. Going now to look up the paper work again.


10 posted on 05/27/2013 6:15:22 AM PDT by libbylu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee; Wiser now; blueyon

Lamberth is a Reagan appointee and presided over the FISA court, which approved covert national security wiretaps. He used to give Clinton fits.

He may simply be growing senile. He was both in 1943 so is 70. Or maybe someone boiled his cat?

OR the government may have loaded up the search warrant affidavit with shocking stuff.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royce_C._Lamberth


11 posted on 05/27/2013 6:17:18 AM PDT by shalom aleichem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Let me see, turned down by two judges, goes to a third, highly unethical. Then they allegedly told Fox News about the subpeonas but Fox has no record of being told. Methinks we have the makings of a case against Mr. Holder. And not to forget, his excellency put Holder in charge of looking into this problem. Seems to me his excellency should go too as an accessory or in common parlence, a cover up artist.


12 posted on 05/27/2013 6:17:24 AM PDT by Mouton (108th MI Group.....68-71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Poorly written article.
Judges do not “appeal” anything.


13 posted on 05/27/2013 6:17:51 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

right. Judge did not “appeal” and it would be a severe breach of protocol to allow judge shopping, unless Just Us Department lawyer lied and said “you are the first judge we came to”


14 posted on 05/27/2013 6:20:49 AM PDT by shalom aleichem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Okay. Here’s the question. Does holder deserve a ping list all his very own? Let me know.


15 posted on 05/27/2013 6:28:32 AM PDT by MestaMachine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shalom aleichem

“The subscriber therefore will never know, by being provided a copy of the warrant, for example, that the government secured a warrant and searched the contents of her e-mail account,” Judge John M. Facciola wrote in an opinion rejecting the Obama Administration’s argument.

“Her” e-mail account? Gender error, IRRC.


16 posted on 05/27/2013 6:30:38 AM PDT by GladesGuru (Islam is antithetical to, and Islam is irreconcilable with, America. Therefore - Islam Delenda Est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mouton
Let me see, turned down by two judges, goes to a third, highly unethical.

The original New Yorker story, on which this Gateway Pundit "recap" is based, provides the pertinent information. The Gateway Pundit recap is poorly written. The first "two judges" were magistrate judges; Judge Lambeth is a U.S. district court judge.

There is nothing "unethical" about DOJ's appealing to a U.S. district court judge an order of a magistrate judge with which it disagrees. That's how the process works. Simply put, there was no "judge shopping" here.

17 posted on 05/27/2013 6:33:13 AM PDT by DSH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
What an idiotic characterization by Jim Hoft. Taking an appeal of a denial is not "judge shopping." Judge shopping would be going from one trial court to another until you get a trial court / magistrate to sign the warrant.

Not defending Lamberth's decision, but his role is to review decisions by lower courts.

18 posted on 05/27/2013 6:36:21 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Someone needs to get this judge’s checking account statement around about this time period.

Of course that would have to be done by Holder and...

aw hell, this country is so far out of whack, I don’t know if it can come back.


19 posted on 05/27/2013 6:36:50 AM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to thoe tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
Royce C. Lamberth? Wasn't that the judge Larry Klayman was always in front of and ruling for Justice Watch against the Clintons?
20 posted on 05/27/2013 6:38:27 AM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson