Buchanan - read his article and he outs himself as a bald-faced anti-american liar. An agreement between the British, the French, and with silent approval of the Soviets. And Buchanan blames it on Woodrow Wilson and the U.S. I can find no evidence Wilson and the U.S. I am no great fan of Wilson. But Buchanan is pure and simply lying to promote his communist anti-U.S. agenda. Why doesnt he move to one of the countries he likes - Russia, Germany, Palestinian encampments. Id much prefer him to lie from there.
1916. No Soviets. The tsar was still around.
He doesn't blame Sykes-Picot on Wilson. Quite the opposite, he says it contradicted Wilson's ideas.
I'm not sure if borders actually are going to change now, but at this point, getting involved doesn't look like a good idea.
posted on 05/28/2013 3:11:01 PM PDT
Agreed. The guy misread Buchanan’s article.
posted on 05/28/2013 4:57:48 PM PDT
by AEMILIUS PAULUS
(It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson