Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Genetic Recombination Study Defies Human-Chimp Evolution (article)
Institute for Creation Research ^ | May 31, 2013. | Jeffrey Tomkins, Ph.D.

Posted on 06/05/2013 8:25:10 AM PDT by fishtank

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: ro_dreaming

yes, my post was both to you in confirmation for what you stated, but also to htose who keep insisting there’s no credible scientific evidence that macro-evoltuion is impossible- there’s actually a lot of scientific evidence that it’s not possible, not even remotely possible


41 posted on 06/06/2013 8:28:59 AM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: CottShop

in the bible, God clearly tells us that THROUGH ADAM Death entered the world, He did NOT state that through evolving animals, Death entered the world. ‘Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned’ (Romans 5:12).

Before the fall of man, there was no death because htere was no sin- but in theistic evolution, there HAD to be death and sin before the fall unless oen is to beleive that animals as they were evolving didn’t die for billions of years until Adam eventaully evovled- The only way to reconcile evoltuion with hte bible to come up witrh theistic evolution is to deconstruct God’s word, and to once again beleive i nthe impossible- that life could have gone on without death which is a result of sin for billions of years awaiting the evoltuion of man so that man coudl then sin and cause death to begin- Either that or “God didn’t really mean that Adam was the the cause of death and sin-” (once again beign forced to decosntruct God’s word i norder to fit into a theistic evolutionary belief system)

26And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth. 27So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. 28And God blessed them, and God said to them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moves on the earth. …

Man and animal, created together- but to believe Theistic evolution, once again we MUST deconstruct God’s word aND disbelieve His word as beign an accurate historical account of the creation week In other words, we must convince ourselves “God said it but didn’t really mean it, and hte apostles and Christ and the prohpets all said it too, but htey too didn’t really mean it”


42 posted on 06/06/2013 9:27:28 AM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: CottShop

So...God’s word is the earth was created 6000 years ago, man and dinosaurs hand in hand.

Sorry, haven’t found that in the Bible!


43 posted on 06/07/2013 6:33:44 AM PDT by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Dudoight

[[Sorry, haven’t found that in the Bible!]]

Really? It’s pretty clear right in the begining of God’s word- Did man bring sin in the world or not? (Hint, God says he did) Is death caused by sin accordign to God (Hint- God says it is)

It’s funny you ‘don’t find it in the bible’ when it coems to six day creation, (Even thoguh there is plenty of evidnece it had to be six days) Yet you are more than willign to accept swomethign htat isn’t the bible and has NO evidence to back it up- that God took billions of years to evolve species or that dinosaurs lived for millions of years before man came on the scene-

But whatever- The truth is right therre for you to either accept or reject- it’s pretty clear which you’ve chosen


44 posted on 06/07/2013 8:18:39 AM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson