Skip to comments.The Scandal Dump is a Smokescreen
Posted on 06/09/2013 7:46:41 AM PDT by joygrace
click here to read article
But I do know one thing: the order to "stand down" could ONLY have come from POTUS.
I played golf a few weeks back with a connected Army officer who told me there is a LOT of hushed chatter among senior Army brass about this. It's a KNOWN secret in DC, people in the Pentagon and Congress that ONLY POTUS could give the order to stand down......thus, senior military leaders are both incensed and terrified (scared that those in the know could be sacked--and their precious pensions along with them--if they even think about leaking the goods on Obama).
Discovering who gave the talking points to Susan Rice is a straw man; find out who gave the stand down order.....you'll find your smoking gun and what Obama is so terrified of.
Benghazi didn't have a consulate; diplomatic mission, yes; consulate, no.
Exactly. The “who” gave the orders in all these scandals is Obama himself. If it was anyone other than Obama, we would have the names by now. The fact that no one will say leads to the conclusion that it was him. I guess they are all scared to death which is so wrong.
The Benghazi thing was and is a real threat and impeachable. What we are seeing now is the classic lawyer technique of muddying the waters with scandal after scandal so visibility on everything scandalous is zero. In “normal” times the MS wouldn’t let any admin get away with this, but the MSM is actually helping the admin. Remember ALL of our rulers are, deep down, just 2 bit lawyers...
Seems pretty simple. If there were stand down orders and he is the ONLY ONE who can give stand down orders then he is guilty!
And anyone who does not do something about this is as much to blame and should suffer the consequences also.
Sure they’re scared. His handlers have long tentacles.
That’s why nothing will be done about anything he does.
“STAND DOWN, BARACK OBAMA”
The real scandal and the truth the administration is hiding is the so called “arab spring”.
Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.
Yes, that and the impending immigration legislation wending its way through congress.
Think we are allowed to have multiple scandals. We’ve seen it this way before and it was handled.
Impeachment is merely fact finding and a recommendation by the House of Representatives. The Senate may then vote to retain or remove the President. It is akin to the procedures some organizations have for removing an employee. That is how people should view impeachment. It’s a process to see whether an employee of the US taxpayers should be removed.
Benghazi is a different story. It’s not just about removing an employee. It is way more serious than that. Benghazi leads to questioning our involvement in the overthrow of the government of Libya. Why did Hillary and Obama use American taxpayer funded personnel, equipment and money to overthrow the government of Libya? Have Hillary and Obama ever shown any previous care and concern for the people of Libya? No. But there are a lot of people interested in Qadaffi’s money and the oil in Libya. Hillary and Obama are standing here with their asses hanging out over Libya. What they’ve done doesn’t just get you fired, it gets you in front of a tribunal. That’s why Benghazi is so dangerous to them. These other issues can get you fired. Benghazi can get them life in prison or hung. The Democrats will do anything to get rid of Benghazi.
” Think we are allowed to have multiple scandals”
Yes we are. The impenetrable fortress walls around this administration are finally starting to crumble. If this was them putting out multiple scandals to muddy the waters it is backfiring bigtime.
And weren’t one (or more) of these “new” scandals leaked or otherwise revealed by the agencies themselves?
Such a release doesn’t equal a “devastating revelation” so much as a scripted and cynical ploy to manipulate the news.
We’re being played here, folks.
Where are the rest of those Benghazi whistleblowers, anyway?
The scandal dump isn’t so much a smokescreen as a ruse to get people to believe a lie by repeating it over and over again like they did with the “spontaneous” lie.
The Obama adm. repeated “spontaneous” over and over again so people would repeat over and over again the lie that there was no connection to the attack in Libya and the video protest in Egypt.
The truth is the protest in Egypt was planned in order to create the “spontaneous” lie. It was the Obama adm. that planned the attack in Libya and the “spontaneous” lie was a cover story. Those terrorist are so in tune with the news don’t you know, they can pick up on a news story and plan a terrorist attack in just a few minutes, nothing was planned months in advance, it was spontaneous.
The same thing is happening with the NSA phone data scandal.
You now have all of these people out here, republicans and democrats, repeating over and over and over again “it’s necessary to fight terrorism”.
It’s a ruse to make people believe Obama is really trying to fight terrorism when he’s not he’s actually collaborating with the terrorist as shown with Benghazi.
The attempted car bombing in NYC May 1, 2010, and the planned subway bombing in 2009 (the one they are now trying to claim was stopped because of NSA data gathering) are perfect examples of where the Obama adm. orchestrated news stories prior to the attacks.
Thus the need for the “spontaneous” lie that the terrorist are picking up on the news and planning attacks around the news instead of the news being orchestrated for the attacks.
I know Iran's rebels are in Benghazi as well, but your post has really made me think about what is at stake for Obama and Clinton with their cover up. Thanks.
Oil production in Libya drives their entire economy as you know.
Among the many disturbing and disgusting things about this - this one is close to the top. Honor and integrity for sale.
Exactly. When will we hear from more Benghazi whistleblowers? Is Issa getting distracted or is he working with deposing these people first. I wish there was a next step announced or some update.
Get the dogs chasing their tails and the tails of so many others that they pass right by the obvious.
W had to wake up Pete Hoekstra and a rat woman on the armed services? committee in ‘07 when Israel sacked Syria’s nuke plant.. it’s the law if it looks like the US might have to get involved.
There were probably 20 calls the night of Benghazi asking for cross-border-authority... can the NSA tell us if those phones were ever picked up or just turned off and unplugged.
The call records are there. Let’s hear them.
I called my congressman’s office last Thursday (yes, I used my Verizon cellphone). As I enumerated my concerns regarding the Won, the aide interjected, stating that there is NOT just one SSN (Harrison Bounel) with the Won, but SEVEN!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.