Skip to comments.man hires hitman to kill pregnant girlfriend because she wouldn’t get an abortion: police
Posted on 06/11/2013 10:42:41 PM PDT by Arthurio
A Connecticut man enraged that his pregnant girlfriend wouldnt get an abortion allegedly hired a hitman to kill her, according to court documents.
Carlton Bryan, 21, was riding with Shamari Jenkins, who was four months pregnant, when she was fatally shot April 29 while driving in Hartfords North End, police said.
Alleged trigger man Matthew Allen Hall-Davis fired through the back window and struck 20-year-old Jenkins.
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/conn-man-hires-hitman-kill-pregnant-girlfriend-police-article-1.1367502#ixzz2VyhCz2WK
(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...
Both of them for murder and murder of an unborn child. Neither should be a free man for the rest of their miserable lives.
Wonder why he didn’t just “slip” her one of those abortion pills that are available over the counter? He’d have been home free... /s
Just more pro abortion violence , nothing to see here.
Hartford, CN another city that has diversified. Population was 177 thousand in 1950, currently below 125 thousand.
HARTFORD CRIME INDEX
(100 is safest) Safer than 6% of
in the US.
So, I guess he isn’t pro-choice.
The thing that gets me about this is that the woman
of her own choosing can abort or carry to term
this child, while the man has no say in the matter
except to pay child support. That is wrong.
If she wants to carry and he wants an abortion then
he should not be responsible for that child as it
is then HER decision.
If she wants an abortion and he doesn’t. she can
do as she pleases and he has no recourse.
By the left’s logic, if the woman had only made the right choice...
The only people breeding these days are those too stupid to use contraception.
Idiocracy in action.
Now there’s a guy that doesn’t want to be a father.
I agree with all you say, and even some points you don’t make directly, EXCEPT that the man be off the hook if he wants her to have an abortion, let me adjust that phrasing. Unless he wants to murder their baby, then he’s off the hook. NO!! The time he’s off the hook is before he umm, does the deed. He knows as well as she does what can happen.
Well anyway, I just hope this doesn't affect his EBT bennys or they take away his ObamaPhone because of this one misstep. Dat would beeze Raciss.
Personally, abortion is murder and they both are
responsible. I was merely underlining the
inequality of the current system.
If she wants to abort there is nothing he can do about it.
If he wants to abort, there is nothing he can do about it.
If he wants her to carry to term, and she doesn’t,
there is nothing he can do about it.
If she wants to carry to term, then HE is responsible.
Hope you are well.
Starting to get hot around here.
If abortion was illegal, she would be alive, because the boyfriend could never have asked her to get one, or had the expectation that she should get one.
The pressure put on women to abort their babies by the fathers, by their friends, and by their parents is a form of abuse, one that is encouraged by making abortion legal.
I agree with you on all of this. and you’re right! It’s all about the women and their rights to their bodies, nevermind that their actions have created another human being and/or that they are half of a pair of parents.
It’s very hot down here. VERY hot!