Posted on 06/15/2013 6:00:48 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
Ask the people that caused it. To wit: The Democrat Party.
They haven’t hit it yet but they are getting there
Yes and so was the public bounty they put on Zimmermzn’s head. How many were arrested for publicly threatening someone? The number arrested demonestrates which side the top level law enforcement agencies are on.
A Puerto Rican is a citizen.
O’Mara:
“If we’re going to survive this as a criminal justice system” must ensure “jury verdict is believeable” & trusted.
What the he99 does that mean???
You should be worried about your client not the criminal justice system that is as corrupt as that judge and prosecutor right in front of you.
“believable and trusted”? Shouldn’t there be justice under the law? Not some fabricated outcome based on concerns about how ferals will react?
Sermon for a Sunday morning from Shelby Steele:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=b8292_Eqi94#!
This case just adds weight to justify my firmly held opinion that the people who enforce the law, including the courts, are not to be trusted. The system is a sham, nothing more than another industrial enterprise, with no particular regard for truth or basic fairness. If you are on the right side of it, you are in high cotton, but get on the wrong side of it, and innocence is irrelevant. The system will ruin your life.
Thank you for the post.
It’s procedural justice versus substantive justice.
Did we go through all the motions correctly dancing on cue and singing the right songs — okay then you got your due process of law — so shut up and enjoy the ride.
Zimmerman should stand up in court and tell the judge that he is being railroaded and proof of that will be found in the 85 pjs sent home versus those 35 pjs sent to the courtroom.
What does he have to lose at this point??? This case will be decided like the OJ trial at jury selection.
The judge would slap him with contempt and throw him in jail. If I was in his shoes, I’d defer answers to her questions. He hired lawyers to speak for him, and he does not know the law so he can’t speak to the adequacy of their actions.
Why don’t his lawyers tell him to defer answers to his lawyers??? I have never seen anything so absurd in a court of law.
What are West and O’Mara when she asks him that — potted plants???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.