Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What President Palin Would Not Have Done
the-American-catholic ^ | June 15, 2013 | Donald R. McClarey

Posted on 06/16/2013 4:47:21 AM PDT by NKP_Vet

Palin would not have dismissed the Black Panther intimidation lawsuit that the government had already won.

Palin would not have seized two auto companies and give them to her cronies in and out of the UAW.

Palin and her supporters would not be claiming that her opponents were racists for disagreeing with her policies.

Palin would not have tried to block Boeing from building a factory in South Carolina as a gift to her union buddies in Washington state.

Palin would not have toured the world apologizing for America.

Palin’s Homeland Security Department would not have classified patriots as security threats.

Palin would have expanded oil and gas exploration on federal lands instead of reducing it, make the US even less dependent on foreign oil.

Palin would not have allowed the Pigford suit to be settled that gives billions of dollars to “farmers” that never farmed.

(Excerpt) Read more at the-american-catholic.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: abortion; benghazi; blackpanthers; boeing; carbontax; deathpanels; energy; fastandfurious; impeachnow; irs; kenyanbornmuzzie; obamacare; opec; palin; pigford; southcarolina; washington; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: raygunfan

“She has denied it as well, so we have her denial, and no contradiction in theonly iinterview with rice, im not sure what you want to hear”

I don’t want to hear anything friend. If you read my post, Sarah Palin would have my vote today if she were to run for anything. Huge Palin supporter here from the very beginning. I just stated I have never heard him deny it. And I have never heard her deny it either. People make mistakes, and that isn’t saying she did or she didn’t, just that she has my support either way. Although I’d be a liar if I said I didn’t hope it is a lie.


41 posted on 06/19/2013 11:07:36 AM PDT by selfdefense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: selfdefense

but she did deny everything in that trashy book, just cause she didnt go point by point doesnt mean a tacit admittance....she and tod denied the validity of the whole book...

that is why i asked what else you were looking for?

you only brought up the one point of the bb player...why? there were awhole lot of baseless accusations in the book, including the whopping three carefully done questions for glen rice, etc...and the book was universally panned, even by the leftists......


42 posted on 06/19/2013 12:49:06 PM PDT by raygunfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: raygunfan

“You only brought up the one point of the bb player...why?”

Because like yourself I knew the whole book was a sham. What we were discussing is the one that I heard because it received so much press. Had no interest in anything that was in the book and couldn’t even name another accusation.


43 posted on 06/19/2013 7:29:35 PM PDT by selfdefense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson