Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sensitive security vetting at U.S. Embassy in Iraq is turned over to troubled State Department
Washington Times ^ | June 16, 2013 | Guy Taylor

Posted on 06/17/2013 6:39:18 AM PDT by george76

Battered by scandals surrounding security failures in Benghazi and allegations of criminal activity by diplomats, the State Department is taking over the sensitive process by which background checks are given to locals hired to work at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, the largest and most expensive diplomatic post in the world.

The process is presently handled by a private security company contracted to the Pentagon. But a recently circulated contract solicitation indicates that the firm conducting the vetting — and the budget for the process — is being shifted to the State Department's Bureau of Diplomatic Security.

...

Despite more than 10 years in Iraq, the report says, U.S. officials “lack firsthand knowledge of local conditions and the best places to recruit potential candidates,” in part because American diplomats “rarely venture beyond the international zone” surrounding the embassy...

suicide bombings and sectarian conflict between Sunni and Shiite Muslims continue to rage.

But shifting the responsibility for security to the State Department raises its own questions. Elsewhere in the region, the department’s track record on security in postwar environments has been mixed.

Benghazi’s shadow

The department suffered a particularly unfortunate blow last year when armed militants stormed a makeshift diplomatic post and CIA house in the eastern Libyan city of Benghazi, killing U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.

In Benghazi, the State Department worked with a British company that hired local guards to protect the diplomatic post. A report by Reuters in October noted that the company Blue Mountain Group hired about 20 Libyan men — including some who said they had minimal training — to screen visitors and help patrol the makeshift post.

Some sustained injuries and said they were ill-prepared to protect themselves or others when armed militants stormed the facility.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: benghazi; iraq

1 posted on 06/17/2013 6:39:18 AM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76
Sensitive security vetting at U.S. Embassy in Iraq is turned over to troubled State Department

Gosh, what could go wrong?

2 posted on 06/17/2013 6:47:36 AM PDT by ScottinVA ( Liberal is to patriotism as Kermit Gosnell is to neonatal care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Alright, then. Is the staff at the Baghdad embassy ready to be abandoned, murdered and sexually mutilated?


3 posted on 06/17/2013 7:11:59 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

I’m still waiting for the presidential candidates from 2008 to be vetted.


4 posted on 06/17/2013 8:12:39 AM PDT by bgill (This reply was mined before it was posted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson