Posted on 06/18/2013 4:56:00 PM PDT by ConservativeInPA
DENVER - BY MEGAN SCHRADER
megan.schrader@gazette.com
Enough signatures were verified Tuesday to make Senate President John Morse the first state-level elected official to face a recall election, but Morse isn't going to ballot without a fight.
The secretary of state's office verified that 10,137 registered voters in Senate District 11 - west and central Colorado Springs - signed a petition to recall Morse through a election.
Only 7,178 signatures are necessary to take the issue to voters in coming months.
But a voter in Morse's district challenged the petition a few hours after the signatures were verified Tuesday, saying it did not include all the language required under law.
Catherine Kleinsmith filed the protest because the circulated petition didn't specifically demand the election of a successor for Morse. Her protest says the omission of that language invalidates every signature submitted to the state.
"It's just so ironic that these interests, seeking to force an election that most District 11 voters don't want, would skip over key portions of the Colorado Constitution," said Christy LeLait, executive director of the El Paso County Democratic Party, who is also managing Morse's campaign to stay in office.
If the issue does go to ballot voters will first be asked whether Morse should be kicked out of office and, if so, who should replace him. Alternative candidates can get their names on the ballot to contest the incumbent.
Morse was targeted for recall by a group called El Paso Freedom Defense Fund over his support of several gun laws and his leadership style which they said stifled public debate on the legislation.
"We were expecting the most frivolous legal challenges to this and we're prepared to fight this," said a new spokesperson for the group Jessica Kerns, of Denver who opposed the gun legislation at the Capitol this spring. "We're prepared to defend every single petition so that the peoples' voices can be heard."
Three other democrats faced recall petition drives but only Sen. Angela Giron, D-Pueblo, had signatures turned in to be verified by the state. An announcement is expected in coming weeks whether 11,500 of the 13,500 signatures turned in are valid registered voters in Giron's district.
In the Morse recall drive 16,198 signatures were turned in and of those 6,061 were rejected for a variety of issues including signers not living in the district or not being a registered voter.
Kleinsmith's appeal will be ruled upon by Colorado Secretary of State Scott Gessler. His ruling could be appealed in court and should the Democrats be unsuccessful, Morse still is entitled to a 15-day period to challenge the signatures for other reasons.
If challenges to the signatures are unsuccessful a recall election likely would be held in August.
These would be the first state-level elected officials to face a recall vote in Colorado, according to Joshua Spivak, a professor at Wagner College in New York who tracks and studies recall efforts.
If no protests to the recall are successful, the governor will set a date for the election during a 30 day window that begins roughly two months after Tuesday.
According to the El Paso County Clerk and Recorder's Election Office it will cost the county roughly $152,000 to hold a stand-alone election for the recall.
Contact Megan Schrader
719-286-0644
Twitter: @CapitolSchrader
I didn’t consider the of the economic impact of the recall. Just goes to show you that freedom is not free. Better money than blood.
But according to the demoCRATs, all 11 of the recall elections in WI (including the recall election of Gov Scott Walker apparently were all completely honest & justified. Geez, just when you think you could hate democRATs any more than you already do.... They are pure, unadulterated evil!!!
Agreed. Well said.
Geez, just when you think you couldn’t hate democRATs any more than you already do.... They are pure, unadulterated evil!!!
Ironically this is what separates the pubbies from the libs. The pubbies think in broad strokes and focus on the big picture while the libs nit-pick and hair-split.
When Washington state had its governorship stolen by the left we mounted a re-vote campaign. The same thing happened where the libs scrutinized both petitions and statutes and then would file objections based on the slightest of technical errors.
Since the entire state is ruled by the left (right up to the supreme court) most of the objections stuck and we would find ourselves right back at square one. It pays to retain the best liars, er, lawyers that money can buy!
Who cares.Its a leftist wench.Let ‘em have it.
We have a saying down here in the south and that is”He’ll look real good with that broke off in his arse.
The left only hair-splits (typically in court) when they lack an advantage in popular support.
The Dems are trying to play word games. The petition clearly states “recall” and lays out the reasons why. In Colorado law, a “recall” is a term defined by law and specifically defines a election of a sitting official.
He’s not recalled until he loses the recall election.
First the petitions are verified, then an election date is set, then Morse loses the recall election, he loses office, then there is another election to replace him. Only then is there an election with candidate choice on a ballot.
Always get twice the signatures you need.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.