Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

COMMENTARY: An Obama-Buffett Connection Could Keep Crude Rolling by Rail
The Washington Times via Rig Zone ^ | June 19, 2013 | William C. Triplett II

Posted on 06/19/2013 2:03:44 PM PDT by thackney

...

In short, Mr. Obama is about to hammer the American energy industry, and he's doing it for money.

The real elephant in the room is the Keystone XL pipeline project intended to bring Canadian oil to American Gulf Coast refineries and the resulting products onto the international market. In fact, the title of the Bloomberg article cited above includes the words "Keystone foes." Mr. Obama has already delayed Keystone, once and a final decision is coming up.

While Keystone has received a lot of press attention, there are two interrelated aspects that have not yet come to the surface.

First, as reported by the Dickinson Press in North Dakota on May 15, Lynn Helms, the director of the North Dakota Department of Mineral Resources, told the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology that if Keystone is approved, as it comes south, the pipeline would also carry up to 100,000 barrels of sweet North Dakota crude to the American refineries, in addition to the heavier Canadian product. As North Dakota's rate of production increases, the state should be producing in excess of 800,000 barrels per day by the time Keystone passes through, taking at most an eighth of North Dakota's oil production.

Second, Mr. Helms also told the House committee that the North Dakota Department of Transportation estimates moving 100,000 barrels per day by pipeline instead of its current mode of transport would result in three to six fewer traffic deaths per year and up to 150 fewer traffic injuries. Three to six doesn't sound like a lot in comparison to the U.S. national traffic fatalities, but North Dakota has a small population and every death or injury avoided is important to families and loved ones, no matter where they are.

(Excerpt) Read more at rigzone.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; News/Current Events; US: Kansas; US: Nebraska; US: North Dakota; US: Oklahoma; US: South Dakota; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: buffet; energy; keystone; keystonexl; keystonexlpipeline; oil; pipeline; rail; railway; trains; warrenbuffet; warrenbuffett; xlpipeline
Excerpt for Washington Time content
1 posted on 06/19/2013 2:03:44 PM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

“...a final decision is coming up.”

DOA; pre-ordained.


2 posted on 06/19/2013 2:07:13 PM PDT by carriage_hill (Guns kill people, pencils misspell words, cars drive drunk & spoons make you fat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill
I guess the US wants to line up behind the Chinese tankers at the Kitimat terminal.

Unbelievable.

3 posted on 06/19/2013 2:12:34 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (The IRS--a softer Gestapo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Yup. Just show me the money and I will show the explanation for 90% of what happens between humans. Obama’s Keystone decision was never about the environment. It was always about rewarding his billionaire friend, Jimmy Buffet...er, I mean, Warren Buffet.


4 posted on 06/19/2013 2:14:09 PM PDT by 3Fingas (Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

As always, with Chicago Style pols,”Follow the Money!”.


5 posted on 06/19/2013 2:16:43 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

Coincidence that Buffet’s bought-up railway cars and lines to carry the oil, instead of the pipeline? That’s already happening and will increase after 0traitor’s “EPA decision” to kill Keystone XL for good. 0scumbag’s prints won’t be on it; the EPA will do the work for him.


6 posted on 06/19/2013 2:20:34 PM PDT by carriage_hill (Guns kill people, pencils misspell words, cars drive drunk & spoons make you fat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney
 photo bobuff.jpg
7 posted on 06/19/2013 3:02:09 PM PDT by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheel barrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Like they say, “he who dies with the most toys wins.”

You’d think at this point in the old man’s life, he’d be thinking about eternity, not the wealth he’ll leave behind very soon.


8 posted on 06/19/2013 3:11:43 PM PDT by Heart of Georgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3Fingas

Betcha Al oGre has bought railroad stock.


9 posted on 06/19/2013 3:25:20 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

BNSF Railroad is owned by....Berkshire Hathaway.....aka Warren Buffet

Which services the area in question from Canada Border, to Texas.

What do railroads use?

....locomotives.

Who Makes Locomotives?

GE

Who has a special “preferred” class of GE stock....you guessed it, Warren Buffet.

What a sweet deal.


10 posted on 06/19/2013 4:40:28 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (The Government is actively preparing to go to War with a significant portion of its own Citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

Canada has to send the US 2/3ds of all oil production....according to NAFTA

Do not know why that myth of Canada shipping oil to China keeps getting repeated

You can be sure Obama and Buffett know about the NAFTA rule on Canadian oil


11 posted on 06/19/2013 5:47:56 PM PDT by SeminoleCounty (Don't Blame Me For La Raza Rubio....I Voted For Alex Snitker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeminoleCounty
Canada has to send the US 2/3ds of all oil production....according to NAFTA

Sorry to burst your bubble SC, but this is completely untrue.

Quoting from a Canadian government publication(http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/LOP/researchpublications/prb0633-e.pdf):Article 605 of NAFTA has been interpreted by some to mean that Canada is required to sell a certain percentage of its energy output to the United States, even in the face of a severe domestic shortage. Moreover, they argue that NAFTA prevents this percentage from falling over time.

Neither of these statements is true. Canadian producers are free to sell as much oil as they wish to whomever they wish, including, for example, overseas customers. As a result, the share of total output exported to the United States can rise or fall according to the normal forces of supply and demand.

The only condition that NAFTA imposes on Canadian energy products is that all buyers in North America must have equal rights to buy those products.

So, as it turns out the "myth" of Canada shipping oil to China is not a myth. You can be sure that Obama knows Canada can ship as much oil to China as the Chinese can buy, as soon as the infrastructure is in place.

So, now that the myths have been cleared up, you have to ask yourself, why does the US president want China to have all that Canadian oil when the Canadians would be happy to sell it to the US AND build the pipeline to deliver it?

12 posted on 06/19/2013 7:57:58 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (The IRS--a softer Gestapo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson