Skip to comments.
A look at the jurors for George Zimmerman's trial
Yahoo News ^
| 06/20/13
Posted on 06/20/2013 8:03:26 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 last
To: ArmstedFragg
61
posted on
06/21/2013 9:41:08 AM PDT
by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: snarkytart
62
posted on
06/21/2013 9:42:22 AM PDT
by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: snarkytart
63
posted on
06/21/2013 9:42:41 AM PDT
by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: CottShop
I have even more doubts about the one who said she hadn’t heard of the case.
A few possibilities:
1. She’s a liar
or
2. She’s absolutely the epitome of the low info voter.
So, would you rather have your life in the hands of a liar or a doofus?
64
posted on
06/21/2013 9:46:02 AM PDT
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
To: TChad
You have to absolutely know this would’ve happened. A fundamental problem with such reasoning is that jurors have no way of knowing what sort of information is being capriciously withheld by the judge, supposedly on the grounds that it's "irrelevant", but actually on the grounds that it's very relevant but contradicts the approved message.
65
posted on
06/21/2013 5:00:33 PM PDT
by
supercat
(Renounce Covetousness.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson