You folks are touching on Holder, and I think it’s justified to do so. And yes, if we could take him down, that would be great.
I remember all the times we really thought we had either one of the Clintons or one of their goons on the rocks back in the 90s. Did it happen?
Now we have obama overseeing a myriad of crimes. We have the administration dead to rights. I think we should go after him now. Where was he on the night of 09/11/2012? Why didn’t we send help? How was Hillary involved, and just how much control did she have over what did and didn’t take place that night?
You folks seem to think Holder could be taken down, and then it would spur more sound investigations of Obama. I doubt it. Obama would simply replace Holder with another crook.
IMO, we focus on Obama and Hillary Clinton, either taking him down or killing her 2016 aspirations, hopefully both.
We’ll see what comes of this. I’m not always right.
For starters, the Oklahoma City bombing happened.
Now, consider that the Waco Investigation/hearings were scheduled in Congress...
...The "Assault Weapons Ban" was on the way to being repealed (not just sunsetting after 10 years--repeal would have been a reversal of the Clinton Agenda)...
and Randy Weaver (Ruby Ridge) was going to have his day in court, with Gerry Spence as his attorney (pro bono!)..
And the timing of the OKC bombing could not have been worse for any Patriot cause.
Any Islamist connection was promptly ignored and apologies were made to CAIR the same morning as the bombing, despite the description of the two John Does, in favor of blaming the Patriot/Militia movement, gun owners, and who are now described as "bitter clingers", without fail. That site, too, was bulldozed as rapidly as possible, preventing any independent analysis on the ground, just like Waco.
The names and locations and dates may have changed, but the same style pervades, the same lies are told, and, allowing for attrition with time, the same people are involved.
The Clinton meme of ignoring any possible (Islamic) terrorist behaviour, continues to this day, and it was the progression of ignored events which led up to 9/11.
Taking down Hillary would buy a small amount of safety for the Republic, but pulling down the cronies, the behind the scenes people who are pulling the strings would be the ideal. Fat chance, but the fingerprints on both administrations, the whole modus operandi, is the same right down to the last whorl.
Find out who their kingmakers were, who gained, and you will find the man behind the curtain for this administration, too.
But if the two factions could be turned against each other?
They do like to throw others under the bus.
“...I’m not always right.”
Oh, big D1 — don’t sell yourself short. Not so long ago, I posted an article about the death of King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia (unknowingly from an Iranian propaganda organ, no less!) and JR had to pull it! Wikipedia also bought into the lie, so I wasn’t totally alone in being embarrassed.
The thing about the Clintons and BHO2 is they answer to the same people, hence my reference to David Rockefeller. He is part of the international financiers trying to destroy the United States through our banking system.
These people are working from all angles to destroy the U.S. and are not above using murder to achieve their goals.