Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kingston on Immigration: House Unlikely to consider Senate Bill
WSAV (GA) ^ | Jun 24, 2013 | JoAnn Merrigan

Posted on 06/24/2013 10:06:09 PM PDT by neverdem

Congressman Jack Kingston says he still believes immigration reform is important but doubts that House republicans will ever consider a bill from the Senate. "The Senate bill does not have enough border security measures," says Kingston. "Right now border security is a joke."

Kingston says he would vote for border security, an electronic verification system that would help keep track of the status of current immigrants and for some measure that would be a "pathway to legalization." Kingston says that is legalization, not automatically a pathway citizenship.

He says legalization would be a way to provide such things as a guest worker program. Kingston, who is currently running for U.S. Senate believes immigration reform is still important, but believes many of his constituents in Georgia's 1st district want what Kingston calls reasonable reform. "I think immigration is such a hot issue right now because a lot of people look at the current system and just see what's wrong with the government, how it can't enforce the laws it has on the books for one thing," Kingston told News 3.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; immigration; jackkingston
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: neverdem

Companies can’t export jobs anymore without taking flack for it so the next best thing is importing workers.
And they’re going to do it.


21 posted on 06/25/2013 3:31:18 AM PDT by lucky american (The Democrats will follow the big "D"even if it means going over a cliff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks neverdem.

Time’s Up. Immigration Won’t Pass This Year
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3035089/posts


22 posted on 06/25/2013 4:00:44 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (McCain or Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

The only pathway is back to your home country.
Then you just freaking stay there.

And fight for whatever it is you want in your own home country. Not be cowards that come here and steal from those who worked and fought for what they have.

I have ZERO respect for these moochers and never will.


23 posted on 06/25/2013 5:26:41 AM PDT by LibsRJerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I say we mount a huge campaign and POUND on Boehner ... maybe he’ll quit under pressure. This would throw the whole immigration thing into complete chaos. No legislative action until a new speaker gets settled in. And work to get a new speaker who will listen to conservatives


24 posted on 06/25/2013 6:23:49 AM PDT by ICCtheWay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

Last night on Hugh Hewitt’s show, the host asked the guest “What should the House do? Should it do an immigration bill of its own - or should it just ignore the Senate bill?”

The guest responded by saying that if the House passes a bill, the House leadership will appoint conferees who, in conjunction with the Senate conferess, will water down any bill coming out of the House.

The guest said it’d be better if the House simply said “We’re not gonna pass any immigration bill this year”.


25 posted on 06/25/2013 10:50:34 AM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
Yes, there is no amount of "borer security" will be enough to justify amnesty in any bill they could come up with.

Because all of the border security in the world is utterly worthless if congress lacks the will to implement it and the DOJ refuses to enforce it.

26 posted on 06/25/2013 11:39:39 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Rephrasing - no amount of “border security” is enough to justify amnesty in any bill they could come up with.


27 posted on 06/25/2013 11:40:26 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

I could write a bill in two lines that would solve the problem.

1. Enforce current immigration laws on the books.

2. Deport illegals.


28 posted on 06/25/2013 12:15:05 PM PDT by itsahoot (It is not so much that history repeats, but that human nature does not change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It doesn’t matter if the House doesn’t consider the Senate version.

The end game for amnesty proponents is to have the House pass something (anything) and then have House and Senate-appointed conferees hammer out something in conference committee behind closed doors between the House and Senate and then pass the compromise in both chambers.

It’s very important that nothing passes the House or the genie’s out of the bottle.


29 posted on 06/25/2013 4:39:24 PM PDT by capitoltex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for the ping!


30 posted on 06/25/2013 7:44:56 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson