Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman: Both were in the rightó-and both were deadly wrong
Tuesday, June 25, 2013 | Kristinn Taylor

Posted on 06/25/2013 7:53:51 AM PDT by kristinn

Two flawed innocent lives intersected one 2012 February night in the town of Sanford, Florida. Afterward one life was ended and another was marked for death.

The debate over the shooting death of Trayvon Martin at the hands of George Zimmerman sixteen months ago has partisans painting each as villains in order to justify their belief in the guilt or innocence of Zimmerman of the charge of second degree murder.

Those who believe Zimmerman is innocent have rejected the Martin family’s attorneys’ portrait of Martin as a cuddly boy who looked about twelve years old. Instead, they point to Martin’s thug-wannabe social media persona and high school suspensions to portray the just turned seventeen-year-old as a hardened Black street thug who was casing the neighborhood where Zimmerman lived.

Those who believe Zimmerman is guilty have cast the part Black, part Hispanic, part White, then-twenty-eight-year-old as a white racist cop-wannabe who stalked Martin that February 26th night with murder in his heart.

But what if neither view is correct. What if the basic stories told by the two key witnesses in the case were pretty much what happened. Zimmerman and the mysterious ‘Witness 8’s tales overlap on key points.

Witness 8 is the alleged girlfriend of Martin who was supposedly speaking to Martin as he walked though Zimmerman’s neighborhood as he made his way to the townhouse home of his father’s then girlfriend where he was staying after being suspended from school in Miami. Her statement (albeit with spin and hyperbole) was relayed by Martin family attorney Benjamin Crump at a news conference March 20, 2012.

Zimmerman and Witness 8 both say that Martin was staying close to buildings. Both say Martin walked near Zimmerman’s parked car to check him out. Both say that Martin and Zimmerman lost sight of each other. Both say they came back in contact. And both agree confrontational words were first exchanged followed quickly by a physical altercation between the two.

Witness 8 says Martin was staying close to the buildings to get out of the rain—an innocent thing to do—and got upset that someone was watching him. Zimmerman, involved in his community’s neighborhood watch, took into account the rash of burglaries in recent months as he observed the stranger lurking near buildings.

Martin wanted to get a closer look at the stranger to him who was eyeballing him. Zimmerman took that as menacing. Martin then got away from Zimmerman. Zimmerman got out of his vehicle to see where the stranger to him was running toward. Losing him and being advised by the dispatcher not to pursue the stranger, Zimmerman says he started to make his way back to his vehicle.

It is not known why Martin did not go straight to his father’s then-girlfriend’s townhouse. He could have gotten disoriented in the evening rain as he tried to get away from the stranger, or he could have decided to confront the stranger who had gotten out of his vehicle in the rain to follow him. He would have been in his rights to do so--as would Zimmerman be in his rights to check out and follow the stranger in his crime-stricken neighborhood even if the police dispatcher advised him not to.

When the two met face to face, neither got violent right away. They both asked each other ‘what are you doing’ type questions. What apparently made the confrontation turn violent is the move by Zimmerman to reach for his cellphone. As he relates in his written statement to Sanford police the night of the incident: “…as I tried to find my phone to dial 911 the suspect punched me in the face. I fell backwards onto my back. The suspect got on top of me…the suspect grabbed my head and slammed it into the concrete sidewalk.”

Martin could very easily have been acting in self-defense if he took Zimmerman fumbling for a cellphone as him reaching for a knife or a gun. The way he reacted, according to Zimmerman, is exactly how a friend into self-defense told me long ago to get the upper hand in such a situation: First punch the nose hard enough to break it, thereby stunning your opponent, and then beat the tar out of them before they can recover.

So Martin would have been in the right acting in self-defense against a strange man who was following him who reached for something as they confronted each other.

Zimmerman also would have been right in trying to defend himself with deadly force as he did not initiate the violence and was quickly facing having his head bashed in.

There are no eyewitnesses to the beginning of the fight between Martin and Zimmerman, save for Zimmerman himself. The description by one eyewitness who saw some of the fight before the gunshot tracked with Zimmerman’s description at that point of the incident—just as Witness 8 largely tracks with Zimmerman’s account.

It is quite likely that the unarmed Trayvon Martin died believing he was fighting for his life from a stranger who stalked him with bad intent and was trying to pull a weapon on him. Zimmerman saying that when they were on the ground Martin saw the gun in his waistband would only have confirmed Martin’s fears.

If Zimmerman were trying to pull his gun out at the onset, rather than fumble for his cellphone, the fight would have right away been a struggle for control of the gun. There’s no evidence that happened.

It is my belief that both Martin and Zimmerman acted within their rights the night of February 26, 2012. Sometimes acting within your rights with flawed judgment can get you killed. Other times it can get you put on trial for murder by a legal lynch mob.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; FReeper Editorial; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: georgezimmerman; trayvonmartin; vanity; zimmerman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-107 next last

1 posted on 06/25/2013 7:53:51 AM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kristinn
The only thing Little Trayvon had to do that night to not die was to not physically assault George Zimmerman, or anyone else.

Just because somebody annoys you does not mean you have the right to pummel them. That is the foundation of civilized society.

2 posted on 06/25/2013 7:56:44 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Religious faith in government is far crazier than religious faith in God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
I will remind you of how this started:

LITTLE TRAYVON: "You got a problem?"

MONSTER GEORGE: "No."

LITTLE TRAYVON: "You do now."

3 posted on 06/25/2013 7:58:23 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Religious faith in government is far crazier than religious faith in God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Exactly right. Well said.


4 posted on 06/25/2013 7:59:01 AM PDT by GBA (Rubio and the rinos have the GOP Whigging out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Nope, pounding someones head on the concrete would never be considered legitimate self defense under any circumstances.


5 posted on 06/25/2013 8:00:44 AM PDT by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

That is a good analysis, Kristinn. Probably very close to how the whole incident went down.

HST, my contention is that Martin provoked the fight that led to his death — he could have — should have — gone to his father’s condo rather than conFRonting Zimmerman.

I’ll be interested to see how the lawyers FRame it in their arguments and counter-arguments.

I’m rooting for a Zimmerman acquittal, followed by a Zimmerman lawsuit against the state of Flori-duh for wrongful arrest and prosecution.


6 posted on 06/25/2013 8:03:00 AM PDT by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

I disagee.

IF (big if) Zimmerman made mistakes, they were overridden by the mistakes and bad decisions Martin made. Mistakes which cost NO_LIMIT_***** his life.

And then to compound this miscarriae of justice - racist overtones by Crump, Sharpton, Obama and other racists have only added fuel to the fire.


7 posted on 06/25/2013 8:04:17 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thorvaldr
...pounding someones head on the concrete would never be considered legitimate self defense under any circumstances.

Of course, we are told that all of these wounds were self-inflicted. Kind of like falling on your own knife - five times.

8 posted on 06/25/2013 8:05:39 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kristinn; E. Pluribus Unum

If T had gone back to the apt and gone inside, instead of trying to find and confront the person he said was following him, he would not have died that night, nor would Z be in this trouble.

This will be twisted around - already has been -that Z was wrong for following T and doubly wrong for allegedly not doing what the dispatcher said, with the caveat that Z did head back to his vehicle after the dispatcher’s statement, but was confronted anyway.

But the simple point is that Z was well within his rights to be looking at the individual’s movements that night, and that once T said somebody’s following me, all that needed to happen was for T to go inside the apt.


9 posted on 06/25/2013 8:06:29 AM PDT by txrangerette ("...hold to the truth; speak without fear". - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

I’m all for thinking about both sides of the story. The problem is that your presentation TM is simply noncredible. Your own post had to back TM up five years in age to pretend that he was anything other than the street fighting druggie gangsta thug that his Facebook, IMs, school records, and all the other evidence shows he is.

You paint the question of why he didn’t go back to his family’s house as something to wonder about. The creep circled around to confront GZ. There’s no innocent conduct here. And even if this was just a stupid kid who made all the wrong choices that night, that doesn’t change the fact that GZ was justified in believing that TM meant him death or imminent bodily harm.


10 posted on 06/25/2013 8:06:30 AM PDT by FateAmenableToChange (As as)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
It is quite likely that the unarmed Trayvon Martin died believing he was fighting for his life

That realization may have occurred to him for the first time about 2 seconds before he expired. Up until that point, I think it was all fun and games for the little thug.

11 posted on 06/25/2013 8:08:16 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Does anyone know over what distance these events took place? Or how far Trayvon would had to have walked to get back to the apartment he was returning to?

If he’d just kept on walking, how far was he from his destinaiton after he saw Zimmerman?


12 posted on 06/25/2013 8:08:58 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette
Some people feel free to speculate that Little Trayvon was frightened of Monster George, then treat that speculation as fact.

The only real facts we have are that Monster George had been beaten and Little Trayvon had not.

All the evidence points to Little Trayvon being shot while in the act of beating Zimmerman.

Unless you want to be like England and make self-defense a crime, Monster George is innocent.

13 posted on 06/25/2013 8:09:52 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Religious faith in government is far crazier than religious faith in God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Will88

Trayvon Martin - Basic Geography May Cut Against Zimmerman (Or Not - See UPDATE)

14 posted on 06/25/2013 8:12:17 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Religious faith in government is far crazier than religious faith in God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
That's pretty much the way I suspect it happened too...

The entire prosecution case seems to be based on GZ's ONE statement about "these ass-holes always get away with it"... That statement is an explanation for why GZ FOLLOWED him... in no way does it show an intent to go KILL somebody.

There'd better be some additional, SHOCKING new evidence if they expect to get a guilty verdict.

15 posted on 06/25/2013 8:15:38 AM PDT by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them f)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

What rubbish! The drug abusing, high on pot, jewlerly stealing, purple drank guzzing, suspended from school, fight club member, THUG, Trayvon Martin, did not fear for his life because of a cell phone.

If Martin had gone in his pocket to pull out his cell phone and Zimmerman had pulled his gun and shot him to death, would ANYBODY say he was justified?

Martin was a THUG, high on drugs, who resented being questioned by a neighborhood watchman and then brutally attacked him.


16 posted on 06/25/2013 8:15:41 AM PDT by Above My Pay Grade (The people have the right to tell government what guns it may possess, not the other way around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Nobody has the right to try to administer a beat down on another person just because they looked at them. Even if they are stoned and not thinking

Trayvon earned what he got.


17 posted on 06/25/2013 8:16:04 AM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The jerk missed/skipped 53 days of school. Students go to school 5 days a week. 53 days is almost 11 weeks of school missed. Kind of a lot, eh?


18 posted on 06/25/2013 8:17:05 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

The goal of the Circus in Sanford is to get both the Stand Your Ground law and the Castle Doctrine struck down, creating court precedent for Leftist activists to get similar laws in other states stricken from the books.

That way, citizens cannot defend themselves when the Gibsmedats come boiling out of the urban kraals. Jesse and Al, as well as the NBPP, have already stated that there WILL be riots, regardless of the verdict.

Back-door Gun Control, legislated from the bench. That’s all there ever is or was to this case.


19 posted on 06/25/2013 8:17:39 AM PDT by Old Sarge (My "KMA List" is growing daily...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

It is not known why Martin did not go straight to his father’s then-girlfriend’s townhouse. He could have gotten disoriented in the evening rain as he tried to get away from the stranger, or he could have decided to confront the stranger who had gotten out of his vehicle in the rain to follow him.


That right there is pretty much everything, and what saves Z’s butt. Fact is, the timeline and the geographic locations of events all point to Martin doubling back and surprising Z.

And they forgot to mention that witness * testified that she told Martin to just let it go, but he didn’t. This is BEFORE Z and M met again.


20 posted on 06/25/2013 8:18:14 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

With the exception that the article is slightly softer on Martin than me (and only slightly), I think he has nailed the whole thing.

He has also nicely summed up why this is Z’s case to lose, and any competant attorney should be able to handle this with “half his brain tied behind his back.”


21 posted on 06/25/2013 8:21:48 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Taxman
gone to his father’s condo

It wasn't his father's condo. It was his father's girlfriend's condo.

I agree with you that Martin provoked the fight. Or rather that he was worried that if the police were called, he would end up being kicked out of his father's girlfriend's condo, where he was living in VIOLATION OF RENTAL AGREEMENT. So, he took the immature and drug-addled action of trying to punch out Zimmerman so he couldn't call the police and so that he could escape.

One could IMAGINE that Trayvon's father had already admonished him NOT TO GET IN ANY TROUBLE OR HE'S OUT. That was 'likely' a CONDITION of Trayvon moving in that the 'girlfriend' has specified. If she didn't, then she would have to be a completely irresponsible person.

22 posted on 06/25/2013 8:22:11 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Not widely noted, but evidential in this context. George Zimmerman is Hispanic, while his (assailant? victim?) is of distinctly an American of African descent. This was a black-on-Latino encounter, and any element of race, if injected into the argument, really stirs the pot.

Street gang element? Not apparent, but this may be an underlying motive, a young black man trying to make his reputation among his peers - “I took down that (insert inappropriate epithet here), and slammed him good!”

Clearly, Trayvon must have had an “ah, S***!” moment just as the cold steel of the barrel of the pistol was thrust into his chest.


23 posted on 06/25/2013 8:22:35 AM PDT by alloysteel (Unattended children will be given a Red Bull and a free Kazoo. Reminds me of Congress...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

He tells witness 8 that somebody is following him.

IF he was scared and fearful for his life at THAT point, just go inside the apt. and lock the door.

Evidence shows he decided to confront the person who had been following him.

Really? Scared? Really?

I don’t doubt that when Z reached for his cell phone that would’ve been interpreted as a threatening move.

If the assumption was that Z was reaching for a knife or a gun.

T was itching for a fight. Too late when he decked Z only to learn that Z pulled out his gun and shot him to stop the deadly assault of head slamming into concrete. I think Z has said that T said something like, “you got me” before quickly dying.

It will be so easy to show that even witness 8 advised T not to try anything with the person who followed him, but that T was itching to confront him, did so, violently, and died for it.


24 posted on 06/25/2013 8:22:36 AM PDT by txrangerette ("...hold to the truth; speak without fear". - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Witness 8 says Martin was staying close to the buildings to get out of the rain—an innocent thing to do—

Buildings? Let's get this right. These were houses. You walk close enough to my house to stay out of the rain, and I'll confront you myself.

25 posted on 06/25/2013 8:22:37 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
LITTLE TRAYVON: "You got a problem?"

Wouldn't that be:

Lil’ Trayvon©

26 posted on 06/25/2013 8:23:32 AM PDT by Rinnwald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I will remind you of how this started:
LITTLE TRAYVON: “You got a problem?”

MONSTER GEORGE: “No.”

LITTLE TRAYVON: “You do now.”


That is the reason I’m not as soft on Martin as the OP. I think Martin’s hubris got him killed. The “fight club member” thought he was going to make quick work of the short pudgy guy. Except the latter carried the great equalizer. Oops.


27 posted on 06/25/2013 8:23:43 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
I think it was all fun and games for the little thug.

I don't. I think it was serious. Trayvon was already in TROUBLE, having been kicked out of his FAMILY HOME.

He was living at his father's girlfriend's RENTAL CONDO.

ONE MORE INCIDENT, and his father would likely had to have thrown him out. Where would Trayvon go then ? He might have to get a job and pay for his own living quarters. His solution? Violence.

28 posted on 06/25/2013 8:27:44 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Zimmerman was doing what neighborhood watch is supposed to do, watch suspicious people and report suspicious activity.


29 posted on 06/25/2013 8:29:04 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Will88

According to yesterday’s opening statements, Trayvon was about 70 yards from the rental condo where he was living, in violation of the rental agreement.


30 posted on 06/25/2013 8:29:29 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

“Nobody has the right to try to administer a beat down on another person just because they looked at them. Even if they are stoned and not thinking”

Indeed.


31 posted on 06/25/2013 8:30:27 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS

Darned right!!


32 posted on 06/25/2013 8:33:00 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2; E. Pluribus Unum

Thanks for the replies. It’s a larger layout than I would have guessed, but if Trayvon was shot 70 yards from his destination, he sure had the opportunity to ignore it all and just return there with his tea and Skittles.

What sort of 17 year-old seeks a confrontation with an older stranger rather than just getting out of the situation by returing to the place he was staying? But they’ll fight any evidence that portrays Trayvon accurately.


33 posted on 06/25/2013 8:35:05 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS

“Buildings? Let’s get this right. These were houses. You walk close enough to my house to stay out of the rain, and I’ll confront you myself. “

Insert here the Clint Eastwood “Get off my lawn” picture

(I would, but don’t know how).


34 posted on 06/25/2013 8:35:10 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

You left something out...”BAM!”


35 posted on 06/25/2013 8:39:10 AM PDT by FrdmLvr (culture, language, borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The only thing Little Trayvon had to do that night to not die was to not physically assault George Zimmerman, or anyone else.

And had Zimmerman displayed his firearm as he was replying "no", St. Trayvon would (probably) still be alive after fleeing like punks do.

36 posted on 06/25/2013 8:39:24 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

I have a question. They are making much of Zimmerman calling the police on black “youth” previously. What was the racial make up of the neighborhood? And a second question. Did the robberies stop after St Tryvon of Martin behaved stupidly?


37 posted on 06/25/2013 8:41:02 AM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Revenge is a dish best served with pinto beans and muffins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

I stand corrected re: condo owner.

You make and interesting point — “ immature and drug-addled” — doesn’t need much more explanation, does it?


38 posted on 06/25/2013 8:45:09 AM PDT by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: FrdmLvr

There were a bunch of “Helps!” in between.


39 posted on 06/25/2013 8:46:27 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Religious faith in government is far crazier than religious faith in God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

All the what if’s and could have been shouldn’t really matter. The events before and after the fatal encounter may help to explain the confrontation but the point of legality is the physical encounter itself. Who initiated potentially fatal force that was met with successful deadly force? Who was on the offense and whom was on the defense? That should be the basis of this trial. Everything else is material for the media talking heads and race baiters.


40 posted on 06/25/2013 8:57:15 AM PDT by yadent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
When the two met face to face, neither got violent right away.

Incorrect implication. They left out the fact Martin sought out and walked *towards* Z, who was walking back towards his car...

41 posted on 06/25/2013 8:59:04 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Sorry Kristinn, you conflate being within your legal rights with being right morally and ethically.

No Limit Nigga was at the location of his demise because he had been repeatedly suspended from school for possession of burglary tools, possession of stolen property, possession and sale of pot, and finally assault on a bus driver.

The heat was on Tray, and he fled to his daddy's crib in a ripe community where he was not known.

Now it was easier to shop at the local convenience store exercising his legal right to purchase the fixin's of Purple Drank, the thug culture's current narcotic of choice.

Unfortunately on the way back to the crib, while looking in residential windows, he ran into Zimmerman, the off duty Neighborhood Watch senior officer, in his watch neighborhood.

Who be in the right, again, girl?

42 posted on 06/25/2013 9:02:20 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

It’s pretty clear kristinn, you’ve never spent any time in the senseless murder districts and or around people like Martin.

In addition, you intentionally left out a whole lot of facts.


43 posted on 06/25/2013 9:11:14 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

[[Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman: Both were in the right—-and both were deadly wrong]]

Yep- blindsiding someoen and CRIMINALLY ASSAULTING THEM WITH INTENT TO MURDER (and even announcign the intended murder) is ‘right’ only if you are a yougn black liberal I guess-


44 posted on 06/25/2013 9:13:57 AM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Mistakes which cost NO_LIMIT_***** his life.

Why the censorship?

Trayvon "No Limit Nigga" Martin himself used the term "nigga" self-referentially.

It cannot be offensive, and you cannot be legitimately accused of giving offense by calling the self-so-called @no_limit_nigga a no-limit nigga.

Race hustlers and the perpetually offended be damned!

45 posted on 06/25/2013 9:16:14 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

a person has a right ot follow someone- even gettign an inch away fro m,their face if they so choose to- a person does NOT have a right to assault another person-

How was martin ‘right’ i nwhat he did? He was bashing george’s head agaisnt cement in an attempt to murder him AFTER the intitial CRIMINAL ASSAULT occured when he blindsided george- How does his actiosn be seen as ‘right’?


46 posted on 06/25/2013 9:16:47 AM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thorvaldr

[[Nope, pounding someones head on the concrete would never be considered legitimate self defense under any circumstances.]]

It is in a stand your ground case where you feel your life is in danger- howeve3r, that is not what happened i nthis case- martin was the agressor- he was the one who initiated an attempted murder-


47 posted on 06/25/2013 9:18:28 AM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

interesting summary, most likely closest to the truth.


48 posted on 06/25/2013 9:19:16 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Unindicted Co-conspirators: The Mainstream Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge
The goal of the Circus in Sanford is to get both the Stand Your Ground law and the Castle Doctrine struck down, creating court precedent for Leftist activists to get similar laws in other states stricken from the books.

That way, citizens cannot defend themselves when the Gibsmedats come boiling out of the urban kraals. Jesse and Al, as well as the NBPP, have already stated that there WILL be riots, regardless of the verdict.

Back-door Gun Control, legislated from the bench. That’s all there ever is or was to this case.

I'm afraid that you have taken the long view, and that is the foundation of this action. It's all about making the producers helpless and dependent on a governmental police state.

49 posted on 06/25/2013 9:22:59 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: FateAmenableToChange

[[that he was anything other than the street fighting druggie gangsta thug that his Facebook, IMs, school records, and all the other evidence shows he is.

You paint the question of why he didn’t go back to his family’s house as something to wonder about. The creep circled around to confront GZ]]

And htat is precisely the point- the kid was nearly home, but mostl ikely htought he was gonna get ‘whitey’ and make a name for hismelf- mostl ikely, the more he thought abotu beign followed, the angrier he became, until he made the fateful descision to try to teach ‘whitey’ a lesson (perhaps even murder him, and later claimign self defense if he could manage to do so- his gansta name woudl then be ‘legendary’ o nthe street forb havign stood up to ‘
whitey’

This is all conjecture of course- but it’s a very likely scenario- I can picture martin steaming with anger as he’s beign followed- seethign with anger until he thinks in his own mind that he can make a name for hismelf if he can murder this dude following him-

This kid was a wanna be gangster- thsi was his opportunity to ‘prove his gangsta-ness’ and he took it- only he foudn out he shouldn’t have the hard way

[[that doesn’t change the fact that GZ was justified in believing that TM meant him death or imminent bodily harm.]]

Exactly- WHENEVER soemoen smashes your head into a hard object- even just once- you can safely and rightfully assume that htey are tryign to murder you as hard objects agaisnt hte head brign about death tiem and time again as proven out by facts- You do NOT need to wonder whether they are tryign to murder you- your answer is YES- they ARE tryign to murder you- it is NEVER right to smash someone’s head agaisnt ANYTHING- NEVER

Hopefully omarra makes htis point VERY cleasr to the jury-


50 posted on 06/25/2013 9:28:53 AM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson