Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/26/2013 5:41:29 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: SeekAndFind

Geez——another disappointment.


2 posted on 06/26/2013 5:43:16 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Military chaplains will now be forced to violate their conscience
I hope Rand realizes that. All chaplains should abdicate in disgust. That will take out a lot of the religious service members too, who don’t want to be in the field without spiritual counsel.


3 posted on 06/26/2013 5:44:59 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

FURP! Rand Paul is randomly unreliable, ie, a liberaltarian squish.


4 posted on 06/26/2013 5:46:32 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Ted Cruz is quite literally the only man I trust in Washington right now.

As for Rand, give him a couple months and his tune will change. He seems to shift a lot to suit the audience.


5 posted on 06/26/2013 5:47:33 PM PDT by AskNotReceiveNot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Once again, the people who use the system the way it is set up are getting screwed by the people the people who sit on their asses and use short cuts.

What about the rights of Voters to shape their government? What about them?


6 posted on 06/26/2013 5:47:35 PM PDT by Tzimisce (The American Revolution began when the British attempted to disarm the Colonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

rand is an effing moron.

doma WAS the law that left it up to the states, it kept the federal govt from having a national “yes” on the issue. by having a “no” position at the federal level it allowed states to have either a no or yes position.


7 posted on 06/26/2013 5:49:53 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

and rand, you stupid asshat, thedemocrats don’t agree to disagree on anything in their party, they tell the minority to shut the eff up. works pretty well for them in terms of getting what they want.


9 posted on 06/26/2013 5:51:44 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
There are things determined and defined by Federal, States, The People, and or God.

Those thing determined, defined, and endowed by the Creator TRUMP Federal, States, and The People. The institution of Marriage is one of those things.

12 posted on 06/26/2013 5:56:50 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Rand Paul: The Supreme Court’s DOMA ruling was appropriate

WRONG!

It was appropriate only to a flaming Lib or Libertarian.

21 posted on 06/26/2013 6:15:24 PM PDT by jazusamo ("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Culture usually and eventually trumps law. Pursuing legal/political solutions to cultural issues is a waste of effort.


22 posted on 06/26/2013 6:22:29 PM PDT by TexasKamaAina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Rand, you are toast! toast in the pres primaries!!!


23 posted on 06/26/2013 6:24:43 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (we're the Beatniks now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind; All
I'm not a fan of RINO Rand Paul. But not only have the states never delegated to Congress via the Constitution the specific power to regulate marriage in any way, but DOMA was arguably a violation of the Constitution's Clause 3 of Article VI which prohibits religous tests for federal employees.
Article VI, Clause 3: The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States (emphasis added).

26 posted on 06/26/2013 6:32:40 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Many social conservatives won’t be happy to hear him talking about leaving things to the states

BS.

I'm thrilled. A lot more should have been left to the States, and the Federal Government kept small.

If the homos want to dominate a state, people will at least be able to vote with their feet.

When it's national the last line of defense is the Church and it is under attack, too.

Personally, I will refuse to recognize any homosexual union as "marriage".

29 posted on 06/26/2013 6:37:20 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I just find it kind of sleazy when the American people vote on something and five creeps wearing black robes say, “Oh no you don’t”. I don’t think that’s the America that the Founding Fathers had in mind.


32 posted on 06/26/2013 6:45:53 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Osama tried and failed. Obama got it done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

libertopian vs conservative


34 posted on 06/26/2013 6:53:24 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, and Senor Rubio are unlikely to be the GOP nominees in 2016, and even more unlikely to be elected POTUS.


39 posted on 06/26/2013 7:16:12 PM PDT by mohresearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I get the bad feeling Rand Paul is going to go full blown Rubio on some issue or another before 2016. I don’t see that happening to Ted Cruz.


42 posted on 06/26/2013 7:27:10 PM PDT by Reddon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Many social conservatives won’t be happy to hear him talking about leaving things to the states,

Actually they are, but not when it creates gay marriage for all of America or frankly, anywhere in America.

America was founded by people dedicated against such a thing, and they would never have tolerated it, or created the legal argument for it to become the law of the land.

47 posted on 06/26/2013 8:01:57 PM PDT by ansel12 (Libertarians, Gays = in all marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration or military service laws.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Bachmann, Cruz and West are the only three I trust. Pretty much.


50 posted on 06/26/2013 8:28:26 PM PDT by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I could get on board with Palin in 2015, but not Rand Paul..


54 posted on 06/26/2013 8:33:18 PM PDT by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson