Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coulter: Chris Christie's 'Dead to Me'
Breitbart.com ^ | 27 June 2013 | Breitbart Staff

Posted on 06/28/2013 8:10:08 AM PDT by Rockitz

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-163 next last
To: Rockitz

I wonder if fatso got any off of her.


51 posted on 06/28/2013 8:45:03 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

I have never read anything the Ann has written that was not basically true.

I refuse to be mad at her for having trouble finding anyone to support from the herd of RINOs that the ruling class pushes on us. I have that trouble too.

FWIW Even though Romney was weirdly socialy liberal, I think had the experience to have a shot at turning the country around from a financial perspective.


52 posted on 06/28/2013 8:45:10 AM PDT by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

Yea we do have to trust her as she is a main pundit on the right and people are influenced by her more than most people they elect.

And if she runs interference for her lib buddies with her vote Romney BS, Conservatives lose votes and libs gain them because of her.


53 posted on 06/28/2013 8:45:51 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Christie’s RNC speech told the entire story: “It’s all about me”.


54 posted on 06/28/2013 8:45:55 AM PDT by BlueStateRightist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
I always knew Ann would turn around on Christie.

Bah, she's helping him. He's running as a super-moderate (i.e. liberal) right now and the lefties HATE Ann Coulter so her support didn't look good to them. With this, that's gone.

55 posted on 06/28/2013 8:46:55 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

“...How a politician feels about us exercising that one, basic, fundamental HUMAN Right tells you almost everything you need to know about them and what they would do TO you given political power....”

My sentiments exactly, brother.

They don’t place the same value on my life as I do. Therefore, I will do whatever I have to do to protect myself.

If the Public Servants have armed protection around the clock, I will too.

Pretty much period.


56 posted on 06/28/2013 8:48:15 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

It took her, way too long to come around.

I can partially forgive her, but will always be suspicious.

Glad to see her come around, though.


57 posted on 06/28/2013 8:48:35 AM PDT by rbmillerjr (We have No Opposition to Obam a's Socialist Agenda:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Too bad she didn’t wise up sooner.


58 posted on 06/28/2013 8:48:37 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

She comes on local Boston radio every Monday and this past Monday was no exception....here in MA we had a “special” senatorial race on Tuesday to fill john effin kerry heinz’ seat - a whacked out lib (congresscrook ed markey) vs gabe gomez - (he’s left of scott brown). Gabe did a lot of his speeches in english/spanish and swore up and down he’d get the spanish vote, no really, they were going to come out in force to vote for him because he’s one of them (and he supports rubio’s immigration reform)....26% of the total populace of MA turned out to vote and guess what, the hispanics did NOT come out in force to vote for gabe, but, I digress, anyway, local guy Howie Carr told Annie about gomez/markey and asked her to ask the people of MA to vote for the lib lite because “he isn’t markey” and lo and behold there was Annie telling the people of MA to vote for gabe lib lite because “he isn’t markey” - he did the concession speech in english/spanish.


59 posted on 06/28/2013 8:48:40 AM PDT by rockabyebaby (We are sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo screwed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I guess Ann finally did the math. Sell millions of books to conservatives. Or sell one book to Christie.


60 posted on 06/28/2013 8:49:18 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

I just hope she stays ‘around’. Which is far from a given.


61 posted on 06/28/2013 8:50:22 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Like I said.

“Be sure and let me know how that works out for you.”


62 posted on 06/28/2013 8:53:23 AM PDT by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Anne Coulter has been indefatigable on exposing this immigration amnesty travesty and has been doing so in bold terms. She refers back to the early evils of the 1965 Immigration act and the 1986 Reagan era amnesty

As such I support her 1000% no matter any other problems I have with her, they are tiny


63 posted on 06/28/2013 8:53:28 AM PDT by dennisw (too much of a good thing is a bad thing - Joe Pine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
I hear ya. Pragmatism and conservative incrementalism have no place here- all conservative principles, all the time

Neither does geographic reality. I had a ten minute personal chat with Scott Brown a few weeks ago - total chance meeting. Here is a guy, if he lived in SC, would be far better than Lindsay Graham....but he lives in Mass and Mass voters are not SC voters. I honestly believe he is torn on what to do being from Mass. Our problems are Graham and Cornyn and Chambliss and McCain and Corker and Alexander - much more than they are (were) Brown or even Snowe. Too many conservatives lose sight of that. And while there are principled hills to die on at times....like Mike Castle in Delaware...some hills and some times are not worth dying on. It takes a little bit of grey matter to process this.....and the jerk of the knee is rarely correct.

64 posted on 06/28/2013 8:54:26 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
About friggin' time, Ann.

However, now your judgement is in doubt going forward.

Now let's talk about that Bill Maher thing.

65 posted on 06/28/2013 8:55:24 AM PDT by Washi (PUSH BACK! Encourage your legislators to introduce pro-second amendment legislation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
He hasn’t made so much as a dent. Don’t believe evrything you hear about Crispy Cream.
66 posted on 06/28/2013 8:55:34 AM PDT by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Well we are living your method right now with DOMA shot down, an invasion ongoing and the rest. How is that lesser evil stupidity working out for us all?

Tell me does the Stupid Burn?
I really want to know.
So many excuses that I hear,
Just bouncing to and fro

I hear it’s quite conservative
And rainbows lead the way
In front of tanks and planes and bombs,
To make our soldiers Gay

Likewise today around the right,
Lets make a choice severe,
Abort unwanted children,
Adopt them to a queer!

And what about the guns you own?
What did supporters say?
It truly must be Reaganesque,
To take them all away!

For shame the bitter clingers,
With Bibles by the bed.
Believe instead in Steve and Bob,
Whose right we’ll make to wed.

Such was the choice the GOP,
Bequeathed to us to vote.
Our patriotic duty,
Just hold your nose and choke.

Alas I am not stupid.
I do not feel the burn.
But come election season,
I fear they will not learn.

Another leftist RINO,
Or Democrat they’ll pass
Upon the the right wing public,

Well they can kiss my ass.


67 posted on 06/28/2013 8:56:45 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

I agree she stayed with Christie to long, and yes I liked Christie a lot at first too. Give Ann credit she got illegal immigration right, and very quickly too. Amnesty is the big one, and she got the big one right. I am happy Ann is once again with us and forgive her.


68 posted on 06/28/2013 8:57:00 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been offically denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Anne Coulter has been indefatigable on exposing this immigration amnesty travesty and has been doing so in bold terms. She refers back to the early evils of the 1965 Immigration act and the 1986 Reagan era amnesty

Her book on mob rule is also brilliant, and her work on the religious left - GODLESS - is even more so. She whiffed on Christie for a long time and her words about Newt and Palin have infuriated me to no end. But she's done a helluva lot for our cause.

Principle matters, I agree. But so does talent....and she has the latter.

69 posted on 06/28/2013 8:57:07 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

OK Ann. You’re off double-secret probation. But just keep in mind: drunk, skinny and RINO-infatuated is no way to go through life.


70 posted on 06/28/2013 8:58:00 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JParris
Me thinks some ones book sales may be slipping.....

Ha! I think you're right. I had bought every single one of her books previously, but didn't buy her last book. Same with my daughter. We often used to buy several copies as gifts for other family. But no more. I imagine we are not alone, and she had to notice that in her numbers.

71 posted on 06/28/2013 9:00:01 AM PDT by Reddon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

That would be Rinubio...........


72 posted on 06/28/2013 9:00:43 AM PDT by Red Badger (Want to be surprised? Google your own name......Want to have fun? Google your friend's names........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Norm, you have no immunity from the clutches of Obama and the Dems just because you refused to vote for their opponent. But, since you asked, here is a rundown of the lesser of two evils this week:

Immigration reform: 73% Republicans voted the right way, 0% of Dems and 0% of Independents voted right way.

Voting Rights Act: Kennedy and the court did us a HUGE HUGE favor here....this will be more important long run than DOMA.

DOMA: a disaster, and yet, even Heritage has found some parts of it we can form a fire wall with.

HOUSE: even Boner says Immigration from senate is DOA.

Property Rights; BIG BIG win for property rights in court this week...overshadowed by voting rights and DOMA, but a huge win.

FARM BILL: defetated! In response to our efforts, which, by the way, is how things are supposed to work!

So you see Norm, on your island of purity, the lesser of two evils is often unsavory, but it is, by definition, LESS EVIL than the greater of two evils.


73 posted on 06/28/2013 9:01:18 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Reddon

Nope. I skipped her last two. I refuse to support someone I cannot trust, no matter what they print.


74 posted on 06/28/2013 9:01:19 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Keep making the same mistakes over and over, making excuses and wondering WTF we make no progress.

It ain’t about ‘purity” It’s about principles and either you have them or you don’t. Pick one and live with the results. But don’t bitch.


75 posted on 06/28/2013 9:03:16 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
'bout time. I like Ann, and wish she would've seen through Christie earlier.

She's had plenty of warning. I would bet Ann reads this site - of course I don't know whether she's seen any of my posts, here or elsewhere.

But I've been posting for years, as someone who has seen the real Christie, close-up, in his own neighborhood so to speak, over two decades. He is utterly unreliable, either as a conservative or as a mensch.

Stories abound about Christie's self-importance and "do you know who I am" attitude (from before he became governor) ... stories that would be dragged out and exaggerated by the Left's oppo research teams in the event Christie became a presidential contender.

Glad she's moved on to Ted Cruz, who appears to be the real deal.

76 posted on 06/28/2013 9:03:47 AM PDT by shhrubbery! (NIH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

That’s why they call it “incrementalism.” The “progressives” have used it with great success for the last ~60-70 years, or maybe you hadn’t noticed.


77 posted on 06/28/2013 9:04:10 AM PDT by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
Thank God!... the Christie Kreme kool-aid finally wore off for Coulter.

Back when she was "blowin' to the galleries" about Christie I thought to myself "WHY doesn't she see through Christi's act?

78 posted on 06/28/2013 9:04:39 AM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

I noticed you wanting more of it as long as it’s a R making the incremental moves to the left.


79 posted on 06/28/2013 9:05:05 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

PS. True Federalism reserves the definition of marriage to the states. Read the decision. The SCOTUS left that largely in place and only addressed marriage from a federal perspective.


80 posted on 06/28/2013 9:07:31 AM PDT by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

LARGELY??? How about they go with COMPLETELY or is that the incrementalism you just mentioned at work?

You do not even see you just tanked your own argument...not worth debating. Have fun spreading the Dogma of the left. You will unfortunately have a receptive audience.


81 posted on 06/28/2013 9:10:00 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Took you awhile, hon....


82 posted on 06/28/2013 9:12:18 AM PDT by matginzac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockabyebaby
re: the Markey win. I think a real constitutional conservatve could've won. Scott Brown wasn't re-elected because all he did was compromise; he didn't represent anything.

MA is an odd state. It's liberal in a lot of ways....the unions, liberal "enlightened" university settings, and government programs. But MA people like their freedom from being spied on, having local government diminished, to run small businesses. War is not real popular here. A smarter Republican campaign would've tapped into this independent streak, particulary outside Boston-Cambridge.

After Ayotte in NH traitored constitutional conservatives, voters have become very skeptical. Gomez cane across like another Romney/McCain/Rubio/Ayotte wannabee who couldn't be trusted to bring the nation back. JMHO.

83 posted on 06/28/2013 9:14:07 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Life’s not that simple dude.....and BTW, none of the problems we have today are due to Mitt Romney and people who voted for him. HE DIDNT WIN IN CASE YOU HAVENT NOTICED.

And ObamaCare didn’t pass because too many squishy Republicans won, because NANCY PELOSI and HARRY REID passed it.

Most of the problems we face have nothing to do with squishy Republicans winning elections, though some of them do. The point is, you are fundamentally flawed in your causal analysis that we are where we are because some conservatives vote for squishy Republicans from time to time. That’s just a blitheringly naive anaylsis on your part.


84 posted on 06/28/2013 9:16:18 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
Obamacare passed because squishy Republican Snowe let it out of committee.

Because of her, millions of Americans will suffer 29 hour work weeks.

85 posted on 06/28/2013 9:19:53 AM PDT by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
Not true, but what I do know is that when an individual politician maintains some conservative principles, incrementalism can work just as well from a conservative perspective. When a liberal who maintains no conservative principles is elected, conservatives have no hope of getting anything they desire. I prefer to use the primary process to obtain the most conservatively-principled politician running in the general election who can win. That's when incrementalism can work for the conservative cause. Continue to maintain your conservative principles as I do, but try not to shoot yourself in the foot in exercising your vote during the election process. It's just smart.
86 posted on 06/28/2013 9:21:00 AM PDT by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

About freaking time Ann.


87 posted on 06/28/2013 9:21:28 AM PDT by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

That’s an absurd notion. That was what, like one detail out of a million that had to happen?


88 posted on 06/28/2013 9:23:12 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Coming out of her blonde a coma?


89 posted on 06/28/2013 9:24:13 AM PDT by hope (Whom the Son sets free is free inded!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Ann is the turncoat, Chief.


90 posted on 06/28/2013 9:24:41 AM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" is more than an Army Ranger credo it's the character of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

What????

Are you kidding me?


91 posted on 06/28/2013 9:25:14 AM PDT by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

No, becuase there are counter arguments to that. Her cloture vote wouldn’t have mattered if Brown, another squish, had not won. In fact, if there had been a couple more Republican squishes instead of liberal Democrats, it would not have happened. You’ve pulled one detail out of a universe of connected dots and pretend like the other dots aren’t there. That’s a bureaucratic left brained illness on the part of your cerebral processor.


92 posted on 06/28/2013 9:28:13 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
http://usconservatives.about.com/b/2009/10/13/olympias-snowe-job-on-obamacare.htm

I remember that day. I knew Obamacare would become law after that Snowe vote. I also remember last June with the SCOTUS ruling. Don't lecture me on squishy republicans. Many Americans will suffer because squishy republicans cannot hold the line.

93 posted on 06/28/2013 9:29:38 AM PDT by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Ann’s problem is that she has the mental disorder that many of those that travel in the media set and power set of the GOP have which is a Republicrat fetish. They don’t have confidence enough in their own principles to support a candidate that will actually sell them and act like they believe them so they support what they see as stealth GOP blue state candidates like Christie who they think represent a philosophers candidate of sort turning Democrats to GOP without asking whether they are increasing support for conservative small government free market constitutional positions. Ann really does appear to have a core of conservatism but she fancies herself able to rock with the liberals like Maher and spends a lot of time socializing in the left of center crowd not realizing that they will never be a target Demographic for GOP.

It is hard to read one of her books to not see that she has a heart of conservatism but the problem is she like too many including large numbers of conservatives is they have no faith that they can win with conservatism no matter how much they fawn over Reagan. I understand her initial love of Christie. I mean you have a guy that is boldly speaking the truth in a blue state and he’s winning on what appears to be a mostly conservative platform. What is not to like about that. The problem is what we find is that once his core was revealed you see that Christie is much more interested in serving himself than building the Republican brand. He has created a cult of Christie which increasingly contains more liberal Democrats than Republicans. That which of course is the real problem with this insane idea of trying to find these mythical political Amphibians that will some how save the GOP by down playing what it means to be GOP which incidentally ends up always being more like liberal Democrats.

I hope Ann has learned something from her fetish like support of Romney and Christie both seemingly based on the false idea that we must sacrifice the desire to have an advocate for small government constitutional conservatism to win Presidential elections. Its something a lot of us need to learn and that is we have to have a candidate that is not afraid to make the case for our positions. I favor Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, and Mike Lee for exactly those reasons.
They don’t back down, they don’t behave as if their positions are something to be ashamed of. The left certainly doesn’t they may lie to your face but they are out there every day pushing the envelop to meet leftist progressive goals on both social and fiscal fronts. They don’t pretend to not love abortion, they don’t pretend to not love deviants, they don’t pretend to not love the 2nd amendment they just repackage and keep pushing and what do most GOP do? They acquiesce and even many of us do.

Too many of us act like we are big patriots but are scared to death to take any action outside of giving to a campaign and many don’t do even that. Hell I know people who are afraid to even like or retweet a post of support for something they claim to believe. As long as we are voluntarily silencing ourselves and not speaking up and going on offense with our positions how in the hell is anyone going to desire to join us? You want to know why young people are buying leftwing bs? Its because we are failing to sell our ideas. Instead we have foolish GOP leadership that instead of putting together a marketing plan to sell constitutional small government and strong traditional families and individual liberty they are retreating into blandness and sameness and think that is a strategy to win.

I work in the retail world with marketing departments etc and I can say with certainty that any company trying to promote itself the way the GOP has would go out of business.
Its not like we don’t have good examples of how to run effective conservative campaigns. Rick Scott won in Florida with horrible negatives against him but he had a genius campaign focused on getting people back to work and hard hitting attacks on his opponents. This stuff isn’t rocket science but for some reason we still have GOP campaigns hiring yuppie kids to run their campaigns who think if only we supported abortion and gay marriage we’d win.

I really am beginning to think we need to jettison the GOP and build a truly conservative constitutionalist profamily party.


94 posted on 06/28/2013 9:30:43 AM PDT by Maelstorm (If all are treated as suspects it will not long before we all are treated as prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
No. She could have held firm. She did not. She did not hold the line.

She knew exactly what she did.

95 posted on 06/28/2013 9:31:24 AM PDT by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

You really are not having the same discussion I am having. Yes, she could have held firm. But her voters probably liked her vote. But even that’s not the point. The argument is that voting for squishy Republicans are THE REASON we are where we are. And that is absurd.

In fact, had squish Norm Coleman beat Al FRanken, it wouldn’t have happened. Had Brown not beaten Coakely, it wouldn’t have mattered. Had squish McCain beaten Obama, it would never have been put forth. In other words, for every detrail about squish Republicans leading to Obama Care, there are millions of details that say if more squished had beaten libs, it would not have happened.

Not to excuse the squish behavior, because I don’t. Again, try and stay on the specific conversation we are having:

This is called game, set, match.


96 posted on 06/28/2013 9:34:24 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
Freepers are perfect and have never made a mistake

I noticed you were speaking about me.......

:-)

97 posted on 06/28/2013 9:34:26 AM PDT by Lakeshark (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

YEP, finally you’re here!!!


98 posted on 06/28/2013 9:38:37 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Now wait just a minute before some of those here on FR scold others among the liberty and truth supporters. Maybe it looks like to me, the establishment boys have no use for Ann Coulter any longer so, she is giving them hell. Maybe. The establishment has did a pretty good job of neutralizing the conservatives. Think things through people. Not emotionally. They have used her.

The beltway’s enemies are you, me, Mark, Rush, Sarah, Ted, Michelle M & B, any conservative, the Tea Party voters...now could it be Ann too? She has been instrumental in getting Romney as the candidate. She tore Rubio up because she was shut out. She’s angry. All she has done for those party insiders. Now, will not listen to her about amnesty Rubio. Trust but verify all of these media people, I say. Don’t turn on one another. We need a army/on the same side/them versus the patriots. Pick your side. Maybe, Ann is doing so now.

Maybe, she sees also that we are more onto the game than she ever realized (corruption of the GOP). Do you want to be like that Dana Pierro operative on Fox, no, you can’t-Free yourselves from the Gop-e! ( Dana reminds me of a in the training mini Karl Rove) Just watch Ann. over time. I hope I am right so she will not turn on Sarah or Ted or any others who could turn this country around. Ann betrayed us so we have a right to think of that/keep in mind, I mean.


99 posted on 06/28/2013 9:44:16 AM PDT by Christie at the beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NFHale

Agreed.

If we’re all “equal” in the eyes of the Law, then why do they strive so hard to set themselves above us?

Answer: delusions of grandeur.


100 posted on 06/28/2013 9:46:52 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-163 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson