Posted on 06/28/2013 9:15:38 AM PDT by llevrok
I agree with Bass.
tattoos=inmate graffiti
Pure ugly.
It used to be back in the day that you only saw tattooes on truckers and sailors and some hippee freaks. They looked disgusting then and they look more disgusting now-—especially on women. It’s now wonder that many of our youth covered from head to toe with piercings and tattooes cannot find a job. It used to be considered a sign of nonconformity. Now....I think it is a sign of nonconformity NOT to defile your body with such hideous graffiti and piercings. Even the Bible commands us not to defile our bodies this way. It is not attractive. It amazes me how people go out of their way to make themselves look so ridiculous. It floors me when I am in the market. Someone buys their food with foodstamps, yet they have tattooes. They can find the money to get tattooed, but they cannot find the money to buy their own food. This country is sinking to new lows with each passing day.
McKeown has a right to be a stupid jerk. He doesn’t have the right to be a stupid jerk in Bass’s restaurant.
Great to hear I am not the only person who is creeped out by people defacing their bodies.
They certainly have a right to do it, and I certainly have a right to not want to see someone who looks filthy.
Some of the art work would be beautiful on canvas but on human skin, and not meaning to offend but, especially on darker skin, it is just plain ugly and does give an unwashed appearance.
Many things we have a right to do are not the best life choices.
I’m an Inky. If you don’t want me there, ask me to leave and I’ll go.
It isn’t my restaurant and I don’t pretend to make the rules.
Freedom of association also means a freedom to exclude some folks.
I find all tattoos offensive, but it is useless to complain about it.
There was a picture floating around the net a while back of a woman who had tat’s over almost her whole body. The point of the pic was to show what happened to all those beautiful young hippie chicks and their gloriously tattoed bodies after 50 or 60 years.
This woman was wearing a pair of sandals, nothing else, and looked to be near 70, covered with tattoes and strolling through a group of bikers. Disturbing is the best word I can think of to describe it. Don’t try to look it up unless your insurance covers emotional trauma.
You are quite correct. Tattooes do not age well. Imagine an elderly woman with sagging boobs and a tattoo on that. I shudder to think of it. Tattooes fade on ageing skin. They do not hold up well. It is like looking at an older person with long hair and a pony tail. Simply ridiculous.
My grandfather had one.
But he was a gunners mate on a 4-stack destroyer during WWI and fought the Bolsheviks with the Allied Expeditionary Force to Russia. If he wants the standard USN petty officer’s anchor tattoo, nobody better argue with him...
Agree.
I have never been asked to leave anywhere because of my ink.
The only questions I have ever had after compliments, was what was the significance of the dates.
I am of the mind though, that the ink must have meaning which can last a life time, not something that seems good at the moment.
Also have never seen an artist do ink with walk ins, and long discussions with the person about why they are getting ink. (OH, who knows maybe I just go to great inkers).
Also know many men who have lots of ink for prison ministry, as they are not allowed to bring Bibles, so they ink their walk with Christ and the story of Salvation plus surfers who ink Salvation messages, so when they are asked have a pictorial of the Message.
Agree. Tattoos are pagan and hideous. It is particularly disturbing to see pretty young women with beautiful skin mar it permanently with those awful ink colors. *sigh*
And it’s almost funny to see earth mothers, who rail against anything “unnatural”, covered with tats. Isn’t the ink a foreign chemical? Aren’t they worried about it seeping into breast milk, or is that only for parts per billion traces of other chemicals found in manufactured products?
The whole world has gone nuts. When I was younger, only ex-cons and old sailors had tattoos. They were ugly then, and they’re ugly now.
That is the problem with anti-discrimination laws. They destroy the right to freedom of association. I am in agreement with Sowell and Williams (both black, if you didn’t know) who say private businesses and individuals should be able to refuse to do business with anyone on any basis, even skin color. Most businesses are quite happy to do business with almost anyone, as long as their money is good.
Anti-discrimination laws concerning race were the camel’s nose under the tent. Now we have Christians being sued for not renting rooms to homosexuals or providing services for their “weddings”.
If racists want to be racist, they will just lose out to other businesses that are not. Government was main culprit in discrimination in the South in the form of the Jim Crow laws. As usual, government is the root of most of our ills.
Me neither. Only two of my tats are visible in short sleeves and neither are vulgar, explicit, etc... One is a tribal design I came up with and the other is a tarantula (My Dad is an arachnophobe).
If you open up your business to the public, you should expect the public to bring their baggage along with them. However, it is YOUR business and you define the limits. If we the public think you are taking things too far, we'll take our money elsewhere and you will go out of business.
Funny how free markets take care of problems like that all on their own without some bureaucrat getting their pound of flesh out of the deal...
Even the Bible commands us not to defile our bodies this way.Yep! And here's the verse for anyone interested:
Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the LORD. --Leviticus 19:28
Same here. One thing I do is avoid hiring models/talent who have any visible ones.
He wasn't even told to leave, he was just asked to put on a shirt.
Too bad the rest of the world doesn't have your respectful attitude.
Link, please?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.