>>> His conviction was in 1995. This woman dated him, and got pregnant by him, WELL AFTER he was a convicted sex offender. <<<<
>>> why on earth would she have to visit a father who was convicted of raping another daughter - his son, her half-brother, molested her in a bathtub. <<<
>>>> Mr. Elizondo claims he is innocent of the original charged, and that Ms. Knight fabricated an additional charge that young Sarah, while visiting him, was molested by his 19-year-old son from a previous relationship. <<<
>>> This article is completely confusing. What about the half-brother? It sounds like the person took all of 5 minutes to write this short piece, which raises only more questions in my mind. <<<
>>> I’m confused too. Poorly written article. <<<
The more people try to make sense out of this story and figure out the details, the more bizarro questions it raises. There's something very fishy about this entire sorry episode. It's also strange how sloppily written this "news story" is.
English. It’s such a difficult language.
Youcan read the divorce/custody case here:
http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/GetCaseInformation.asp?submitted=true&viewtype=caseGeneral&casemasterID=2198455&db=Oklahoma