Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

From Newsmax, via the Pajamas Media Tattler ("Lois Lerner could be Held in Contempt of Congress")

Alan Dershowitz: "You can't simply make statements about a subject and then plead the Fifth in response to questions about the very same subject. Once you open the door to an area of inquiry you have wiaved your Fifth amendment right...You've waived your self-incrimination right on that subject matter."

1 posted on 06/28/2013 11:21:03 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Laissez-faire capitalist; All

That hard-core Tea Partier and ultra-right-winger Alan Dershowitz... How dare he... (sarcasm).

Perhaps Democrats to reconsider their caustic statements about Republicans and Issa since the panel vote?


2 posted on 06/28/2013 11:24:30 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

“Thank you for coming here today, Ms. Lerner. Last time you were here you made some statements that we’d just like to follow up on with a few questions to make sure we fully understand the issues you raised...”


3 posted on 06/28/2013 11:31:38 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Universal Background Check -> Registration -> Confiscation -> Oppression -> Extermination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Alan Dershowitz: "You can't simply make statements about a subject and then plead the Fifth in response to questions about the very same subject.

You also cannot, after claiming the 5th and making a statement, answer a question from the chair and then just clam up.

4 posted on 06/28/2013 11:40:29 AM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Prep the House prison cell for one Ms. Lerner...


5 posted on 06/28/2013 11:41:44 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Alan Dershowitz: "You can't simply make statements about a subject and then plead the Fifth in response to questions about the very same subject. Once you open the door to an area of inquiry you have wiaved your Fifth amendment right...You've waived your self-incrimination right on that subject matter."

Derschowitz has a history of liberal ideologies as a whole, but he does possess streaks of common sense as well.

9 posted on 06/28/2013 11:55:10 AM PDT by ScottinVA ( Liberal is to patriotism as Kermit Gosnell is to neonatal care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Wait a minute, am I missing something here? I thought this IRS scandal was resolved and it was time to move on? At least that’s what Eliza SCUMmings said.


10 posted on 06/28/2013 11:55:50 AM PDT by Kevin in California
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

What I’m gleaning from Issa is he’s creating an intolerable (for dems) drip-drip-drip scenario. He’s being verrrrrrryyy deliberate. I like how it makes the darkside sweat.


12 posted on 06/28/2013 11:59:56 AM PDT by ScottinVA ( Liberal is to patriotism as Kermit Gosnell is to neonatal care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

So what happens? She still refuses to talk...Congress votes to hold her in contempt of Congress. Nothing happens, any more than after Holder was held in contempt. The public doesn’t learn anything more about the goings-on at the IRS.


14 posted on 06/28/2013 12:19:36 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

IIRC, when called before Congress, you are allowed to state your name and your address [for identification purposes].

Then, if you want to take the 5th, you must do it then.

After that, you answer yes or no only to questions asking if you intend to take the 5th or not.

Other than that, you clam up.


18 posted on 06/28/2013 11:29:08 PM PDT by Lmo56 (If ya wanna run with the big dawgs - ya gotta learn to piss in the tall grass ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

It’s sickening to watch the democrats crawl for their crooked employees. There is NOTHING where they’d find each other guilty.


19 posted on 06/29/2013 6:35:19 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
The original Fifth Amendment protection was specified as protection from being compelled to be a witness against oneself in "a criminal case." How it got to be expanded to covering Congressional committee hearings IDK, but probably there has been a welter of case law around this, as the issue appears to remain unsettled.
22 posted on 06/29/2013 8:55:54 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

The Dems are probably already shopping for a federal judge who will say she did not waive her 5A rights. It’s the way of the Dem (and not available for Repubs/conservatives).


23 posted on 06/30/2013 3:17:32 PM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson