Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Flat Earthers believe in climate change ( Back at you ---Obama )
JoNova ^ | June 27th, 2013 | joanne

Posted on 07/01/2013 2:18:17 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Flat circle, wall of ice around the edge. Hmm

Let it be known, the next time you are called a “Flat Earther” you can point out that the Flat Earth society (or at least their President) is on the same side as Al Gore and James Hansen. It’s a piece of useless trivia that’s good for useless conversations.

I did not believe there was such a group so I scoped out their site expecting it to be a joke. But if it is a satire, it’s a very detailed one, they have maps and t-shirts, and explanations, and so far I haven’t found the joke. Salon.com decided it was real:

Actually, even the Flat Earth Society believes in climate change

Yes, such a group exists. It thinks the world is flat — but also getting warmer

In his big speech on climate change today, President Obama mocked Republicans who deny the existence of man-made global warming by derisively referring to them as members of “the Flat Earth Society.”

As it turns out, there is a real Flat Earth Society and its president thinks that anthropogenic climate change is real. In an email to Salon, president Daniel Shenton said that while he “can’t speak for the Society as a whole regarding climate change,” he personally thinks the evidence suggests fossil fuel usage is contributing to global warming.

Read more…

 

What can I say? With 7 billion people, odds are that some people might believe the world is flat. It’s apparently centred on the North pole and radiating out to end in a wall of ice all around. (That stops the oceans from draining off. Handy.) They call themselves empiricists (the world looks flat) and at least don’t claim to know what’s beyond the wall. To the obvious retort about astronauts and camera’s, they point out that photos of Earth can be faked. They have explanations for the day-night thing, and the summer-winter thing, but I can’t say I feel any urge to give up my solar-centred globe model. (The sun would have to be pretty small, or hey, flat itself, to get the dark effect on one half… no let’s not even go there.) With each explanation of the flat world, another law of physics explodes.  I felt like an anthropologist visiting a lost tribe. I don’t want to be mean… they seem like nice people.

Nicer indeed than the name-calling cheats who call us “Flat Earthers”.

H/t to Willie. :- )

 

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]

********************************************************************************

The short killer summary: The Skeptics Handbook. The most deadly point: The Missing Hot Spot.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: climatechangefraud; climatechangel; globalwarminghoax; obamaclimateagenda; obamaclimatespeech

1 posted on 07/01/2013 2:18:17 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Related thread:

Obama Mocks Skeptics Of Climate Change As "Flat-Earth Society"

2 posted on 07/01/2013 2:20:00 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Dang! I heard this the other day and had to stop my application process. I guess I gotta look for some real deniers to tie up with. Either way, I’ll keep denying.


3 posted on 07/01/2013 2:20:40 PM PDT by rktman (Inergalactic background checks? King hussein you're first up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Do the people around Obama ever use Bing , Google or even DuckDuckGo ? He used flat earther because he thought it was a nice insult ,but got it wrong again


4 posted on 07/01/2013 2:35:24 PM PDT by molson209
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

you can’t say ANYTHING that will either shut the left up OR cause them shame- they are icnapable of feelign shame no nmatter how deep in crap they are


5 posted on 07/01/2013 2:38:05 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CottShop
You are exactly correct. I recall an anecdote about a conservative in a debate with a liberal. The liberal put forward two points that contradicted each other.

The conservative pointed out the contradiction.

The liberal said “That is the difference between us. You care about being consistent. I care about winning.”

6 posted on 07/01/2013 3:24:26 PM PDT by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

sick isn’t it? They literally can’t be shamed into anything- they get caught in al ie, they simply move on to another lie that htey think noone iwll question them about and pretend htey neverl ied the first time- You can’t win an argument with people liek that, nor can you present any kind of truth- they simply do not accept it- ever


7 posted on 07/01/2013 9:08:24 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson