FOCUS ON JOBS: Jennifer Epps-Addison, leads a small protest at Gov. Scott Walkers Wauwatosa home Tuesday, where demonstrators demanded the governor, Focus on jobs, not vaginas.
Have they sacrificed a goat yet or are they sticking with sacrificial children?
Methinks that it should be off limits to invade the Governor’s private home. Keep the protests at the Capital in Madison.
FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think an ultra-sound is performed on the vagina.
Might have to take out a few of them. Small loss.
They’re always thinking about their vaginas.
Ten bucks says that every single one of them had a yeast infection.I mean,we *are* talking about...ahem...aren’t we?
DONT FOCUS ON OUR VAGINAS! UNTIL WE WANT ABORTION ‘RIGHTS’ - THEN FOCUS ON OUR VAGINAS
Bascom Hill needs a serious fumigation.
As long as Planned Butcherhood demands public funding, then I get a say in the matter.
This bill literally inserts a vaginal probe into womens vaginas in the era of small government,
To be indelicate- we would not be having this discussion, if certain probing was kept to minimum.
Confidential to protestor: Uh, sweetheart, it is your uterus, not your vagina, that is the focus here. Can you not understand normal thinking?
These “women” participating in this charade are obsessed with their own equipment. The governor - or anyone else - is interested in their vaginas. It’s a “shock-jock” ploy to get attention.
The left desperately needs a diversion from scandal-o-rama, and obamacare, so they pull out the poison pill (second only to “racism”)’ abortion.
It’s election prep, getting the troops lined up for 2014. Fodder for the Anderson Cooper’s of the world to use in the debates.
Using their vaginas as a political tool is no different than prostitutional extortion.
I’ve never understood anybody who claims to be pro-woman arguing against informed consent or requiring abortion providers to have the facilities required to handle life-threatening complications. If it’s really about women making their own decisions, then requiring information to be provided to them is a must. And if it’s about keeping women safe from “back-alley abortions”, then requiring legal abortions to be safer than “back-alley abortions” is a must.
People who argue against these things are revealing themselves not to be “pro-choice” but to be pro-ABORTION. They don’t want safety or informed choice to get in the way of abortions.
I can think of about 15 punch lines with what I read in this article. Problem is most of them would get me banned.
Walker should emerge from the house dressed as Anthony Weiner. Something tells me these hags would scatter like cockroaches in the light!
One thing I know you wont find in womens vaginas...”
Sounds like a lead in for an Obama joke.
1) NEVER trust a hyphenated woman.
2) He's not interested in your vagina, Mizzzz Epps Hyphen Addison. Neither am I. He's interested in the baby you're determined to kill.
Ugh, not without a gallon of Clorox and a haz-mat suit. Yuck.
Better to just kill babies, eh Jennifer? Obama, with regard to his intrusive gun control, said, “If we can only save one child.” Obviously that doesn’t apply to the beautiful innocent lives of a baby waiting to be born. Good luck at the Pearly Gates Jennifer.
Hmm. What if the child aborted had the make-up to grow up and build a huge business that could have created these jobs?