Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay Weddings, Synthetic Babies, and the Brave New Court (Tough Times Ahead)
American Thinker ^ | 07/03/2013 | Robert Oscar Lopez

Posted on 07/03/2013 7:54:39 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Mark Steyn published a must-read piece in National Review Online. He argues that the way gay marriage received federal recognition by the Supreme Court was in its own class of bad.

As Steyn points out, our gay marriage consensus compares unfavorably even to the socialist democracies of Latin America and Western Europe, dissolving amid riots, bankruptcy, and birth rates below replacement level:

When less advanced societies wish to introduce gay marriage, the people's elected representatives assemble in parliament and pass a law. That's how they did it in the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Norway, Sweden, Portugal, etc. But one shudders to contemplate what would result were the legislative class to attempt "comprehensive marriage reform," complete with tax breaks for Maine lobstermen's au pairs and the hiring of 20,000 new IRS agents to verify business expenses for page boys from disparate-impact groups. So instead it fell to five out of nine judges, which means it fell to Anthony Kennedy, because he's the guy who swings both ways.

The bad news doesn't stop there, though.

A bill in California forcing the public health plan to finance lesbian sperm-banking dovetails with a current bill on surrogacy contracts pending in the nation's capital. Lesbians must have the "right" to sperm, and gay men must have their "contracts" with surrogate mothers safeguarded.

Straight people started the artificial reproductive technology morass to deal with infertility, but it's now the gay lobby that promises the future growth market for the synthetic baby business, as well as the most compelling ideological pretext to normalize commercialized procreation. (Hypocrisy alert! In the 1970s, homosexuality was fervently de-pathologized by the medical field, but now homosexual activists compare themselves to heterosexual couples with medical disabilities such as infertility in order to qualify for artificial reproduction rights.)

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; homosexuality

1 posted on 07/03/2013 7:54:39 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Homosexuality and Lesbianism: a serious infectious disease that has descended upon America and is killing us as surely as Obamacare.


2 posted on 07/03/2013 7:57:01 AM PDT by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Promoting mental illness at taxpayer expense is not the way to a successful society.


3 posted on 07/03/2013 8:02:35 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

I have been following this writer on American Thinker and really appreciate Mr. Lopez’s telling of the truth from firsthand experience. Here is another eye opener from a truth teller in Canada - sickening what happens to those who try to expose the lies.

http://www.henrymakow.com/


4 posted on 07/03/2013 8:39:40 AM PDT by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The ‘synthetic baby’ issue is the opening wedge of genetic manipulation. If not here then in Japan or Russia a profitable business in creating designer humanoids will appear in the not distant future. Couple this with the explosion in robotics that is just about to happen and you have a glimpse of a future in which being a humanoid is just one type of sentient being. It is estimated that in science and technology the next hundred years will produce more change and ‘progress’ than the last 20,000 years. Brave New World that will be savage new world is just about to arrive. The implications are truly revolutionary and for many humans will be impossible to adjust to and there is going to be a great deal of violent dysfunction accompanying these changes.


5 posted on 07/03/2013 9:38:11 AM PDT by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Congress needs to pass legislation which does three things: 1. Reaffirms the majority-belief that marriage should be between a man and a woman, 2. Affirms all the tax and other benefits for civil unions so there is no substantial grounds for anyone to complain about discrimination, and most importantly: 3. Bar the judiciary from ever again adjudicating any and all marriage-related issues - inasmuch as the USA does NOT need five black-robed dictators shoving their predilections up the nose 300-plus million Americans - by using its (that is, Congress') constitutional power to take away all Federal Courts' jurisdiction, or ability to say anything, on the matter of matrimony.
6 posted on 07/03/2013 10:32:08 AM PDT by Trentamj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson