Skip to comments.Zimmerman Prosecutor Criminally Indicted By Grand Jury For Allegedly Falsifying Arrest Warrant
Posted on 07/05/2013 2:37:00 PM PDT by virgil283Edited on 07/05/2013 3:20:41 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
" Florida State's Attorney Angela Corey has been indicted by a citizens' grand jury, convening in Ocala, Florida, over the alleged falsification of the arrest warrant and complaint that lead to George Zimmerman being charged with the second degree murder of African-American teenager Trayvon Martin in Sanford, Florida.
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
This is a “citizens’ grand jury,” convened by Larry Klayman.
Does this have any legal weight?
Larry Klayman called this grand jury. I wonder what the prosecutor is required to do with this. Can they simply ignore it?
Larry “send me money so I can continue the circus” Klayman?
They’re taking their orders from Attorney Corporal Holder.Something tells me that the IRS has something on one or more of the state’s main players.
Being indicted by a Citzens’ Grand Jury has got to be both hugh and series.
This is about the 4th time this phony story has been posted. Get rid of it please.
The same as you weigh in space.
let’s hear about how much effort YOU have put in compared to Klayman...
Larry send me money so I can continue the circus Klayman?
It has to be. I wish I had the money I sent Judicial Watch to NOT get the Clintons.
About as much weight as posting “Guilty!” on a naughty teacher thread.
lets hear about how much effort YOU have put in compared to Klayman..
Uh, Larry Klayman got a lot of money from a lot of us and he didn’t deliver.
He might have made an effort but didn’t get anywhere. But he did pad his bank account.
Isn’t this just a form of what the San Francisco Committee on Vigilance did back in the 1850s ? I really don’t believe there is a citizen right to indict if there is a belief that justice has been subverted. Race hustlers like Al Sharpton would love something like this to become a standard practice for aggrieved communities.
I don't know; I've never heard of SFCV.
I really dont believe there is a citizen right to indict if there is a belief that justice has been subverted.
What, then, is a presentment?
no kiding. Be careful what you give credence to. The Sharptons and SJlee’s of the world would have a mainstream press enabled heyday.
In other news the Florida Citizen’s Grand Jury indicted Metamucil for not making the oldsters poop enough. Next up: They’re going after the racketeers at the KOA Kampgrounds who ask old people to pay attention when they park their RVs.
FTA: ‘’black activists such as Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, who whipped up wrath against Zimmerman...’’
And they say blacks suffer from ‘’the soft bigotry of low expectations.’’ But what else can reasonable people expect from blacks like the Reverends Jesse and Al and their numerous followers but the very low expectation that they will foment riots if George Zimmerman is not convicted by the kangaroo court they forced Florida officials to set up through threats and intimidation?
And if the Reverends Jesse and Al managed to accomplish that, why shouldn’t we also expect them to threaten and intimidate the jurors so that they will deliver a guilty verdict?
I’m not sure but I think this has been pulled by the Mods at least twice
The hell with that. He should be criminally indicted for making the jury listen to the likes of Rachel Jeantel and Schipping Bao and that other nutcase ME.
First I ever heard of it, so I looked it up:
WHEREAS it has become apparent to the citizens of San Francisco, that there is no security for life and property, either under the regulations of society as it at present exists, or under the law as now administered; Therefore the citizens, whose names are hereunto attached, do unit themselves into an association for the maintenance of the peace and good order of society, and the preservation of the lives and property of the citizens of San Francisco, and do bind ourselves, each unto the other, to do and perform every lawful act for the maintenance of law and order, and to sustain the laws when faithfully and properly administered; but we are determined that no thief, burglar, incendiary or assassin, shall escape punishment, either by the quibbles of the law, the insecurity of prisons. the carelessness or corruption of the police, or a laxity of those who pretend to administer justice.
It boasted a membership of 700 and claimed to operate in parallel to, and in defiance of, the duly constituted city government. Committee members used its headquarters for the interrogation and incarceration of suspects who were denied the benefits of due process. The Committee engaged in policing, investigating disreputable boarding houses and vessels, deporting immigrants, and parading its militia. Four people were hanged by the Committee; one was whipped (a common punishment at that time); fourteen were deported to Australia; fourteen were informally ordered to leave California; fifteen were handed over to public authorities; and forty-one were discharged. The 1851 Committee of Vigilance was dissolved during the September elections, but its executive members continued to meet into 1853.
The Committee of Vigilance was reorganized on 14 May 1856 by many of the leaders from the first one and adopted an amended version of the 1851 constitution. Unlike the earlier Committee, and the vigilante tradition generally, the 1856 Committee was concerned with not only civil crimes but also politics and political corruption. The catalyst for the Committee was a murder, in the guise of a political duel in which James P. Casey shot opposition newspaper editor James King of William. The 1856 Committee was also much larger, claiming 6,000 in its ranks. The 1856 Committee of Vigilance dissolved on 11 August 1856, and marked the occasion with a Grand Parade.
Political power in San Francisco was transferred to a new political party established by the vigilantes, the People’s Party, which ruled until 1867 and was eventually absorbed into the Republican Party.
How many times is this meaningless post going to be recycled?
The way it is done now, “citizen grand juries” are nothing more than press releases. However, this *could* change.
In a given state, a law could be created for a process by which a citizen grand jury could be seated. It would have to use the same pool of citizens as a regular grand jury, but participation would have to be entirely voluntary and likely unpaid.
Its purpose would be to assemble both documentary evidence and unsworn testimony, that if the grand jury found was substantial evidence of criminal wrongdoing by a public official, transcripts of those proceedings would be forwarded to legal authorities outside and superior to the authority of the investigated public official, subordinates or peers who could block it.
No. It’s an ad-hoc kangaroo court.
I wish some “citizens” would drag her fat ass to Gitmo.
Shelterguy has had at least as many successful outcomes as has Mr. K layman.
I have never taken millions of dollars from donors to get ZERO results either.
“citizens’ grand jury” == bunch of yahoos issuing a press release. It has no recognized legal standing. We’ve had several of these threads, and they make FR look stupid.
They can ignore it, because Klayman is no longer a prosecutor.