posted on 07/07/2013 4:54:47 AM PDT
It's so easy to tell the opinion of the journalists in these story because any bill opposing abortion is labelled "extreme" and "restrictive" that "punishes" women, etc. while pro-abortion legislation is "expanding coverage" for "women's health" and championing their "rights".
In a just world, the terminology would be just the opposite. Bills like Texas' would be "defending rights" and "protecting children's health" while pro-abortion bills would "punish" children and be considered "extreme".
posted on 07/07/2013 5:21:51 AM PDT
(Howdy to all you government agents spying on me.)
Wow...if a woman’s right to kill a 20-week old fetus is your number one, two, and three issue (as the woman at the end of the article quoted) you are one sick person.
"We have a very credible case to make that if you care about women's health, if you care about a woman's right to choose that's your number one, number two, number three issue, you need to invest in governor's races," Smith said.
Hmmm... If one cares about womens' health, he or she will oppose abortion as it raises breast cancer risk sixfold according to a recent Indian study. Actually the correlation has been suspected for decades.
posted on 07/07/2013 8:37:29 AM PDT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson