Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: onyx
It's so easy to tell the opinion of the journalists in these story because any bill opposing abortion is labelled "extreme" and "restrictive" that "punishes" women, etc. while pro-abortion legislation is "expanding coverage" for "women's health" and championing their "rights".

In a just world, the terminology would be just the opposite. Bills like Texas' would be "defending rights" and "protecting children's health" while pro-abortion bills would "punish" children and be considered "extreme".

2 posted on 07/07/2013 5:21:51 AM PDT by OrangeHoof (Howdy to all you government agents spying on me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: OrangeHoof
It's so easy to tell the opinion of the journalists in these story because any bill opposing abortion is labelled "extreme" and "restrictive" that "punishes" women, etc. while pro-abortion legislation is "expanding coverage" for "women's health" and championing their "rights". In a just world, the terminology would be just the opposite. Bills like Texas' would be "defending rights" and "protecting children's health" while pro-abortion bills would "punish" children and be considered "extreme".

Liberals are like black widow spiders. They can't survive unless they eat their own young. So yes it would be punishing liberal women...
7 posted on 07/08/2013 2:13:58 PM PDT by Wanderer99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson