Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; sickoflibs; AuH2ORepublican

I don’t think she actually is, she was just answering Hannity’s question. Her answer was boilerplate and like most headlines this one exaggerates. I really have a bone to pick with headline writers.


31 posted on 07/09/2013 4:08:46 PM PDT by Impy (Bring back the spoils system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Impy
I don’t think she actually is, she was just answering Hannity’s question. Her answer was boilerplate and like most headlines this one exaggerates. I really have a bone to pick with headline writers.

I agree with you. I heard that, and it didn't sound to me like a serious answer that she was considering it at all, sounded like she was just being nice to Hannity for asking.

39 posted on 07/09/2013 4:33:11 PM PDT by Reddon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Impy

I disagree. She essentially said that the current candidates are inadequate and if a better alternative doesn’t emerge she may run herself.

I think that’s more than boilerplate and newsworthy.


45 posted on 07/09/2013 4:53:13 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Impy

You’re probably right, but we’re all like Charlie Brown with Lucy when it comes to Sarah. All she has to do is put the football on the ground and we come ‘a runnin’.


58 posted on 07/09/2013 5:35:30 PM PDT by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson