Posted on 07/10/2013 12:46:07 PM PDT by Sopater
Edited on 07/10/2013 1:25:19 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
George Zimmerman’s defense team rested its case Wednesday, after using its final day of testimony to paint the neighborhood watch volunteer as a wimp who was getting pummeled when he shot Trayvon Martin in self-defense, at one point commandeering a mannequin introduced by prosecutors in order to re-enact its version of the fight. Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/07/10/zimmerman-defense-winding-down-case-wednesday/#ixzz2Yfzctpuu
In slightly different words, the prosecution wants to show reasonable doubt as to GZ's innocence, to convict.
She looks like she might have enough built up gas to blow her right out of that chair?
Dead ringer...
Someone should photoshop Goodman’s head from that drag photo onto the judge’s body...lol
That depends upon whether the judge made the statement in the prsence of the jury. If the jury was out or if the comment was made during a sidebar, then the question is perfectly proper and appropriate. If the jury was present, then the proper way for the judge to ask the question is "does the defense intend to call any more witnesses" or "does the defense rest?"
“This “not guilty” verdict will cause more chaos than the original crime or even the Rodney King aftermath. “
For that reason, I’m concerned the jury will find him guilty rather than be blamed for rioting and deaths that would result.
No, YOU'RE out of order!
Don’t you just love looking at a photo like that of the judge and knowing immediately that she’s a liberal. It’s automatic.
The defense eviscerated the prosecution so it should be a slam dunk. But you are right, this country has become so crazy and the governance so corrupt that anything is possible.
To give the prosecution their chance to shout random accusations and obscenties to him, interleaved with "did you not?" - while the judge sits back and allows all this?
GZ should not even come close to the witness stand. He has already delivered his side of the story in the video.
Jury may have been paid off by Holder’s people
Bet I know what the verdict will be.
ROTFLMAO !!
Nah....he's just "whacked"!
Perhaps this one had to be over before the NAACP Convention started. It’s July 13-17 in Orlando.
He may still yet testify on sur-rebuttal, after the state puts on their rebuttal (if the Judge and/or Florida law allows it)
Have you seen his approval ratings lately?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
