Check out article.
.
P.S.
Posted on 07/10/2013 9:41:04 PM PDT by Perseverando
Exclusive: Erik Rush lists deaths some theorize have nexus to 'treasonous' president
I know it’s typical for those on the political left to demand peer-reviewed studies, videotape and signed affidavits proving the assertions some of us make concerning the machinations of the Obama administration and socialist encroachment at large, but we all are aware by now that this is a diversion. It’s also a good indicator that we’re correct in said assertions. Like the left’s tendency for projection, wherein they accuse the opposition of that in which they are themselves engaged, it’s a fairly transparent ruse.
That said, the available evidence has long since established the Obama administration as a criminal enterprise and the president as both a treasonous and a disreputable individual. It is undeniable that Obama has enjoyed far more latitude than anyone in his position deserves; just this week, a new book by the Media Research Council’s Brent Bozell and Tim Graham detailing the media’s supporting role in Obama winning a second term was released.
The nefarious undertakings that facilitated Obama’s election in 2008 – discussion of which was considered to be of an overly conspiratorial nature even by many on the right back then – are practically old hat now, particularly in light of the high crimes of which the president is now suspected.
For example: On June 11, Lord Monckton reported in WND that a U.S. congressman told him the birth certificate for the president released by the White House was “unquestionably a forgery,” and “We all know that.” The congressman went on to cite fear of political retribution as the rationale for most cases of Obama’s political opponents eschewing the subject.
Rather risk-averse when compared to those who founded this nation, and cowardly considering the stakes, but we’ll move on.
There are things that
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
for later
RE: MICHAEL HASTINGS Mercedes crash
News reporter mentions a key point in this video (at ZeroHedge):
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3041205/posts
The engine block was found 150 to 250 feet BEHIND the crashed car.
In other words, the engine “suddenly separated” from the Mercedes while it was moving, then the car traveled another 150-250 feet before crashing (or coming to rest) against the tree.
Anybody who’s taken high school Physics knows the Mercedes cannot impact a tree, then send the engine block 180-degrees BACKWARDS against the direction of travel due to the impact.
That would be some kind of “magic 180-degree ricochet” of a Mercedes engine directly opposite the original direction of travel.
Will CIA produce an “animation video” in the TWA 800 style to “explain what happened?”
Hastings was speeding Southbound along Highland (toward LAX) at 4:30am when he crashed.
I lived in LA. The whole town dies at 2am sharp because even the bars are legally required to shut down at that point.
At 4:30am, the only thing moving in Los Angeles is the hospital and the airport.
If you are trying to catch an early flight at 6 or 7am, you would hurry to the airport at 4:30am like Hastings was doing.
Especially if your flight is international and you MUST leave enough time to guarantee you won’t miss it. That’s how to “go off the radar for awhile” when you think FBI is investigating you — fly to a foreign country with your laptop and work from there.
Also, a few nights after the 4:30am Hastings crash, 2 police officers return to the (nearby) police station garage approx 4am, and as they reach out their car window to swipe their access card in the driveway, somebody runs up behind their unmarked police car and starts firing a gun into their car, grazing both officers.
Did that story die yet, or are we waiting for George Stephanopoulos to announce “Nothing to see here?”
Think about it. Those 2 cops were probably on shift when the crash occurred, since they apparently work at 4am, and their police station is near the crash scene.
Maybe they saw or heard something, so somebody wants them dead too.
But killing them SEPARATELY at their separate houses the same week would raise all sorts of flags bc what are the odds of that happening by chance? So they were attacked at a place and time they were #1 guaranteed to show up (end of their shift back at police HQ), and #2 guaranteed to be together (so they wouldnt need to be killed separately, raising even more suspicion).
Reminds me of LA Coroner tech, Michael Cormier, who dropped dead of arsenic poisoning the day his office released the Breitbart autopsy report.
Has the MSM mentioned the word “airbag?”
If the car was hacked, the airbags could have been disabled.
Purposely crashing that car wouldn’t necessarily kill the driver unless (i) Speed was high enough, (ii) Brakes were disabled, (iii) Airbags were disabled.
Any crash scene photos showing Hastings’ airbags deployed?
At this point in Communist takeovers, the journalists are “sent to the gulag.”
Since that’s impractical for Obamatollah (due to the Constitution and public opinion), journalists will be (i) Intimidated (AP wiretapping), (ii) Threatened (Bob Woodward), or (iii) Killed (Michael Hastings; Andrew Breitbart).
Glenn Beck was talking about the Hastings case on his radio show the other day.
Glenn said there were no skid marks, which he thought was odd. Also, Glenn said there were two witnesses who saw one or more explosions in the Mercedes BEFORE it hit the palm tree.
In addition, Glenn said that a witness videotaped the “accident.” Glenn then remarked, “who is out videotaping at 4:30 in the morning?”
He also mentioned about the engine being found more than 200 feet from the wreckage.
I don’t know if Glenn’s points are all true or not, but something is super strange here.
Domo for the Ping.
Back, and to the left... back, and to the left... back, and to the left
Ayoob???
Dang. What did *he* do?? Or what does he know? Should he watch out, or be watched?
Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!
To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I don’t add you to the list...
I’m glad the wheels are turning. Took a while.
The engine fell out of the car! Spontaneously!
Center fuel tank exploded; someone already suggested that!
Ahem
There had to be a second spitter.
Up there on that gravely road.
Like the Chicago Pick 3 666?
LOL
dork
clever repartee’
Not to mention the islamic terrorist group Hamas running a call center to randomly call Americans to vote for Obama -— and the offshore money.
Now why would an islamic terrorist group want to elect a certain man? Gee, that’s odd.
http://townhall.com/columnists/amandacarpenter/2008/05/13/palestinians_phonebank_for_obama
Well, i beg to differ.
One spitter.
High up on the 6th limb.
Behind some carefully-grown branches.
how fast would you have to be going to lose an engine and then, 200 feet later, hit a tree with enough force to burst into flames?
If anyone has a map showing the trajectory of the car, the crash location, and the location where the engine was found, along with any other details of speed, etc., this can be reconstructed.
Following in the steps of Billy Jeff
Beyond that factoid, I, and Sgt. Schultz, know nothing about this.
Sounds like an opposite (if not equal-opposite) reaction. What direction *should* it go?
Gotta read this tomorrow.
Not 200 feet “upstream” against the direction the car was traveling. That is absurd.
Even if it rips free from the car (for example if the car hit a short fire hydrant ripping the engine free and sending it flying), something would need to #1 Stop the engine’s forward flight, then #2 Accelerate the engine all over again in the reverse direction (back up the road).
The “equal and opposite” force if the car hits a tree would stop the engine’s forward travel, partially squash the engine (get absorbed by distorting metal) and any remaining force that didnt get absorbed would push the engine backwards a short distance (a matter of feet or a few yards, not 200 feet).
>>>>Anybody who’s taken high school Physics knows the Mercedes cannot impact a tree, then send the engine block 180-degrees BACKWARDS against the direction of travel due to the impact.
>>Sounds like an opposite (if not equal-opposite) reaction. What direction *should* it go?
So, RDAardvark, you have admitted you never took H.S. Physics, or if you did, it didn’t “take.”
Generally in the direction of travel is the correct answer. Conservation of Momentum is at work here. There are vectors involved. Trees are not giant rubber bands that can absorb all that momentum and reverse the vectors, flinging the engine backwards a long distance.
I was sincere in the question. I do not know if the damage to the car is abnormal.
Think of it in terms of balls on a pool table. If you hit the cue ball into a ball or group of balls, they generally move in the direction of travel of the cue ball, until striking a rubber rail at which point the direction of travel can be reversed.
Trees are generally VERY non-rubber-bumper-like.
“Generally in the direction of travel is the correct answer. Conservation of Momentum is at work here. There are vectors involved. Trees are not giant rubber bands that can absorb all that momentum and reverse the vectors, flinging the engine backwards a long distance.”
Exactly. In a crash, most of the kinetic energy of the moving vehicle is absorbed by the deformation of the metal car.
If that weren’t true (for example, if the car/tree absorbed zero kinetic energy), then a car would “bounce off the tree” and shoot off at the appropriate angle at the exact same velocity it was going when it hit.
THAT is the “engine bounces off tree at roughly 180* angle” theory I’m expecting the Ostapo geniuses to announce thru their MSM. Most folks will believe it.
What really happened is, the car is driving South. Let’s pretend it’s going 60mph. That means the engine (still inside the car) is also moving at 60mph, same direction.
Somehow, some force SEPARATED the engine from the car, then STOPPED the engine’s Southbound 60mph travel, then REVERSED the flight of the (300 pound?) engine block, so that it suddenly starts flying in the opposite (Northbound) direction, coming to rest approx 150-250 feet upstream along the original travel path.
That isn’t what happens in crashes. I’m not going to do the calculations here (b/c I’ve forgotten most of them), but the KE (Kinetic Energy) of a 300-pound engine block flying thru the air at 60mph is very substantial. It would punch a nice hole in a house/building.
It cannot just “reverse direction” unless a very strong force #1 STOPS IT moving Southbound, and then #2 RE-ACCELERATES it in roughly the opposite direction, sending it approx 200 feet back upstream.
A tree won’t do that.
A plastic explosive charge would do it.
Stay tuned for another “CIA Animation” of how TWA 800 “broke in half after the center fuel tank exploded, THEN CLIMBED ANOTHER 2,000 feet IN TWO HALVES before deciding to plummet back down and hit the ocean.”
Things simply do not happen as officially described here. This is simply another case of
obumpa
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
