Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress tries to turn off lights on bulb mandates
Fuel Fix ^ | July 11, 2013 | Jennifer A. Dlouhy

Posted on 07/11/2013 8:06:53 AM PDT by thackney

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: hedgetrimmer

I have a dear friend who when exposed to the light from CFL bulbs (even indirectly), it triggers photosensitivity seizures... it’s heartbreaking, but the best thing is to simply avoid the trigger. Related... and I have no clue ho2 common this is, but the strobing blue LEDs they use on modern lightbars on cop cars “bother” me... it’s hard to explain... it makes me feel nauseated... I guess like those “puke lights” they came out with to intentionally disorient people.


41 posted on 07/12/2013 3:38:03 AM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
I look at it from an efficiency standpoint. Ideally, a light source would mimic daylight, and produce as many lumens per watt as the state of the art will allow. If you're concerned about contamination from heavy metals, then every incandescent, fluorescent, metal-arc, and halogen lamp ever produced is an environmental disaster waiting to happen.
42 posted on 07/12/2013 8:17:07 AM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: factoryrat

That’s disinformation.

No hazmat procedures were ever needed to dispose of an incandescent bulb.

Again, how many people do you know who use CFL bulbs dispose of them properly?

Communists love creating environmental disasters because they accrue power ‘solving’ them.


43 posted on 07/12/2013 11:22:10 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

From the Harvard Medical Review:

But all light is not created equal, says the Health Letter. Blue wavelengths—which are beneficial during daylight hours because they boost attention, reaction times, and mood—seem to be the most disruptive at night.

Studies have linked ...light at night to several types of cancer (including breast and prostate cancer), diabetes, heart disease, and obesity.

Use dim red lights for nightlights. Red light has the least power to shift circadian rhythm and suppress melatonin.

Avoid looking at brightly lit screens beginning two to three hours before bed.

If you work a night shift or use a lot of electronic devices at night, consider wearing blue-blocking glasses.

Expose yourself to lots of bright light during the day, which will boost your ability to sleep at night, as well as your mood and alertness during daylight.


44 posted on 07/12/2013 11:26:19 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

You are correct! It is disinformation! There’s more mercury and heavy metals in the enviroment around you than is what is contained in the average lightbulb. Fluorescent lamps have been around since the 1930’s, and all of them have been dumping mercury into the enviroment since they’ve worn out, and they’ve been bathing you in UV radiation for just as long. The only difference between fluorescents and LED’s is the source of UV radiation. I look at energy usage from purely an engineering standpoint. If an LED lamp uses 4 watts, and a CFL uses 13 watts, and an incandescent lamp uses 100 watts to produce the same amount of light, which one is going to put the least amount of hurt on your energy budget.


45 posted on 07/12/2013 11:59:41 AM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: factoryrat

I never met an engineer that didn’t care if his product was going to hurt the customer.


46 posted on 07/12/2013 12:23:04 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

That’s the luddite view. Everything man made that you come into contact with on a daily basis has the ability to kill you, fast or slow. That’s the price to pay for technology. You cannot enjoy technological advancements and totally mitigate the risks involved. Lifespans in the industrialized world prove this out, that despite us introducing more known toxic compounds into the enviroment, we still somehow manage to live longer, with a better quality of life.


47 posted on 07/12/2013 11:44:30 PM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson