Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indiana school district loses $300K because students refuse to buy first lady’s healthy meals
The Washington Times ^ | July 11, 2013 | Jessica Chasmar

Posted on 07/11/2013 5:01:19 PM PDT by yoe

School officials in Carmel Clay, Ind., said they lost $300,000 last school year because students are rejecting the healthy menu changes brought on by First Lady Michelle Obama’s federal lunch regulations....

[snip] Amy Anderson, the food service director for the school district, said the rules made her feel less like an educator and more like a “food cop.” The changes have even made her consider retiring early.

[snip] “They’re teaching our kids with this meal pattern that it’s OK to throw away,” she told JCOnline. “We did a waste study on three different schools, and there was a huge amount of waste. That was just with produce, fruit or vegetables or milk.”

Other students don’t eat the lunches at all, resulting in a $300,000 loss for the district.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: carmelclay; indiana
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-52 next last
Big Michelle meddling in school affairs...nothing new about the waste in school food programs...most children eat at home...Michelle and others are forcing this program on those who don't need or want it. Good eating habits or bad are formed at home...not during the day when students need the calories to study and stay awake.
1 posted on 07/11/2013 5:01:19 PM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yoe; zot

So much for trying to change the pattern Midwest meat and potatoe eaters.


2 posted on 07/11/2013 5:05:14 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

wanna bet moochelle does not meddle in the school menu for Sidwell Friends?

wanna bet the Wgite House will never serve school lunch menu at a White House party?

wanna bet the obama tribe never ate canned green beans while jetting around the world on Air Force One?


3 posted on 07/11/2013 5:07:16 PM PDT by silverleaf (Age Takes a Toll: Please Have Exact Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Refuse to buy? I was under the impression that school meals were subsidized by you and I ...i.e. free to the students.


4 posted on 07/11/2013 5:07:45 PM PDT by Lizavetta (You get what you tolerate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Well they are saving money on lost lettuce!


5 posted on 07/11/2013 5:08:05 PM PDT by Conserev1 ("Still Clinging to my Bible and my Weapon")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Carmel-Clay would be a very affluent area. Those kids would not be listening to Moochelle and her healthy crap meal agenda.

These are mostly wealthy kids and probably smarter than in most areas. LOL


6 posted on 07/11/2013 5:09:43 PM PDT by dforest (I have now entered the Twilight Zone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Well, obviously Obama needs to issue an Executive Order requiring that these stubborn Hoosiers be required to purchase and eat the meals Michelle has deemed healthy.


7 posted on 07/11/2013 5:09:44 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Another reason for the separation of School and State!


8 posted on 07/11/2013 5:09:51 PM PDT by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta

Yeah, well............they seem to take money from everyone for anything.


9 posted on 07/11/2013 5:09:59 PM PDT by Sarajevo (Don't think for a minute that this excuse for a President has America's best interest in mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Many schools are preventing the students from going home and bringing lunch bags.


10 posted on 07/11/2013 5:12:02 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
School officials in Carmel Clay, Ind., said they lost $300,000 last school year because students are rejecting the healthy menu changes brought on by First Lady Michelle Obama’s federal lunch regulations....

BTW Moochele is no lady.................
I just thought I'd mention that.

11 posted on 07/11/2013 5:12:15 PM PDT by Sarajevo (Don't think for a minute that this excuse for a President has America's best interest in mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Will88

there could be a mandate to force feed the kids, perhaps,
kinda like Gitmo

but with healthy foods.... like cardboard waffles and canned green beans


12 posted on 07/11/2013 5:12:52 PM PDT by silverleaf (Age Takes a Toll: Please Have Exact Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yoe

13 posted on 07/11/2013 5:13:08 PM PDT by null and void (Republicans create the tools of oppression, and the democrats gleefully use them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

I’ll skip the whole concept of subsidizied meals but my daughter’s school changed to ‘healthy’ lunches and most were dumped. Then to add insult to injury, the kids buy chips and candy after school at the Walgreens. In Illinois the food stamp card covers this.


14 posted on 07/11/2013 5:13:11 PM PDT by madameguinot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yoe

RESIST WE NOT MUNCH!!!


15 posted on 07/11/2013 5:14:15 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

they eat veggies while she eats on our dime and her family too eat ribs, lobster and fry ups.


16 posted on 07/11/2013 5:16:34 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
Refuse to buy? I was under the impression that school meals were subsidized by you and I ...i.e. free to the students.

Not for all students. When she doesn't bring her lunch, my daughter pays for hers.

17 posted on 07/11/2013 5:17:17 PM PDT by Gabz (Democrats for Voldemort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yoe

A study? I could have told them that such menus would end up with a lot of waste. For $5.00.

Maybe, instead of wasting money on surveys, they apply some common sense.
18 posted on 07/11/2013 5:21:24 PM PDT by TomGuy (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

19 posted on 07/11/2013 5:23:39 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Most of the school lunches are not prepared by the school cafeteria staff. Most lunches are prepared and delivered by caterers under crony-capital friend/relative type sole source contracts. They are delivered in hot tubs or trays that can be microwaved at the site. Generally, the cafeteria staff only microwaves and serves the crap. The best bet for all school systems would be to drop the Dept of Ag school lunch program completely. For a few cents more they could cut the paperwork, sole source contracts and headaches and provide decent lunches that are actually eaten. Many schools are finally realizing this. Additionally, subsidized or free lunches should mandate proof of need or else you pay or supply your own lunch.


20 posted on 07/11/2013 5:24:24 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (The short list would be the list of all administration officials that are NOT pathological liars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

Even students who pay “full price” for the lunch are paying less than the meal costs. Technically, all lunches are subsidized.


21 posted on 07/11/2013 5:27:46 PM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Well - here where I live - they are introducing Peanut Butter and Jelly sandwiches for students who’s parents don’t pay for their lunch bill...they will eat - but it won’t be the regular lunch! The ones getting free lunch aren’t affected.


22 posted on 07/11/2013 5:29:13 PM PDT by BCW (Book - http://babylonscovertwar.com/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

I pack my kids lunches. My youngest says he will never eat govt. food, lol.

And just like that school district, we live in a nicer school district where if that was to happen kids would just be running down to Sonic or the other places near the high school. We are still not involved in Michelle’s meddling ways. I hope we stay that way.


23 posted on 07/11/2013 5:34:07 PM PDT by Halls (Jesus is my Lord and Savior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

As a Midwestern boy who grew up less than 10 miles from that district; all I can say to the mooch; she can shove her broccoli where the sun don’t shine.

Good for Carmel clay!


24 posted on 07/11/2013 5:34:32 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yoe

This is from the Carmel High web site but it looks like it applies to the entire district. This is very much a upper class area.

Carmel Clay Schools participate in the USDA School Breakfast and School Lunch Programs and must meet the meal pattern requirements. A basic meal provides the following items:

BREAKFAST
1 breakfast entrée
1 serving of fruit or 100% juice
1 Low-fat milk
1 serving bread/bread alternate

LUNCH
1 Low-fat milk
1 serving of meat/meat alternate
1 serving of fruit
1 serving of vegetable

NUTRITIONAL SCHOOL LUNCHES
Breakfast is designed to supply approximately 1/4 of the vitamins, minerals, protein, carbohydrates and fat needed daily by the body. Lunch is designed to supply approximately 1/3 of the same nutrients. The nutritional value of the meals is evaluated over a period of days rather than calculated on a single meal or food item. Children are required to take a fruit or vegetable as part of the meal. This is required by USDA as part of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010.

The sale of Foods of Minimal Nutritional Value (FMNV) is prohibited in the food service areas during the school meal periods per federal meal regulations.

Parents are welcome to join their child for school lunch. Lunch requests can be made to your cafeteria manager or school’s front office staff. We discourage parents bringing in food other than a home packed lunch.


25 posted on 07/11/2013 5:34:59 PM PDT by KirbDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Exactly why McDonald’s quit selling salads and things like that. Nobody wanted them. Then that fat a** Moochele thinks she’s some sort of health guru and forces stuff she wouldn’t feed to her goat on kids that don’t want it.


26 posted on 07/11/2013 5:35:23 PM PDT by SkyDancer (Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredTexasVet
Additionally, subsidized or free lunches should mandate proof of need or else you pay or supply your own lunch.

But I thought the kids ate free meals at school in order to make it easier for the parent/guardian to sell their food stamps.

27 posted on 07/11/2013 5:35:26 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: yoe
There's food and there's feed.

Feed is what food eats.

28 posted on 07/11/2013 5:35:35 PM PDT by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
What a joke....and these places are no different than any fastfood place.

I love the new McDonald Burgers.

29 posted on 07/11/2013 5:37:02 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: yoe

That’s what a high school math teacher friend said: “They throw it away.”

Kale for lunch at school...you’ve got to be kidding.


30 posted on 07/11/2013 5:39:53 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

31 posted on 07/11/2013 5:41:21 PM PDT by JoeProBono (Mille vocibus imago valet;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

Another example of how socialism sucks.


32 posted on 07/11/2013 5:42:05 PM PDT by zot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zot
Obama guide line restrict intake of under 750 Calories for lunch.

My students eat at 1:15 in the afternoon, and they are given something like 4 chicken nugets,and fresh pepper strips, or cucumber slices.

It's not enough to fill a 7th grade student.

I would say about 1/2 my students pack their own lunches.

33 posted on 07/11/2013 5:50:13 PM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: mware

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2IB7NDUSBOo


34 posted on 07/11/2013 5:56:20 PM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun

Be that as it may - I was just correcting the other poster’s misconception that all were free.


35 posted on 07/11/2013 6:01:18 PM PDT by Gabz (Democrats for Voldemort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: yoe

That she wants kids to eat more healthy foods, is wonderful.
That she goes about it by trying to force the healthy food down the kids’ throats (by means of government “regulations”) is indicative of the much larger problem in WashDC today.

The kids (and the rest of us!) are not (or not supposed to be) farm animals forced to eat what The Master says we must eat.

The kids at least have the good sense to say No.


36 posted on 07/11/2013 6:03:23 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ((S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
most children eat at home

I wonder about that....You have facts to back that up?

37 posted on 07/11/2013 6:03:55 PM PDT by Osage Orange (Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

“but I don’t like beets. I’ve tried to like them ...’


38 posted on 07/11/2013 6:14:03 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Unindicted Co-conspirators: The Mainstream Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
there could be a mandate to force feed the kids, perhaps, kinda like Gitmo

Yeah, the Obamas might view Gitmo as a pilot project.

39 posted on 07/11/2013 6:20:45 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks yoe.


40 posted on 07/11/2013 6:39:27 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (McCain or Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gabz
I understand. I was just trying to make a point as well. The thing that really frightens me is not the mandated school lunches, but requiring teachers to approve or disapprove of home packed lunches. If you choose to send a child to public school then their gubmint food is your problem. However, teachers are now required (not everywhere yet) to inspect home created meals and throw them out if they're “unhealthy.” I personally have issues with gubmint’s healthy caloric intake and food pyramid. My kids are skinny and they eat all day long. They eat a lot of healthy fats, complex carbs, and large amounts of protein. They eat many more calories than what Mooch is pushing, and their grain intake is low according to the pyramid. We also eat real food; i.e., no processed prepared items. We make just about everything, including tortillas! I'd be in jail if a teacher threw out my kids’ lunches! Full disclosure: I am a teacher.
41 posted on 07/11/2013 6:44:45 PM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun
The thing that really frightens me is not the mandated school lunches, but requiring teachers to approve or disapprove of home packed lunches. If you choose to send a child to public school then their gubmint food is your problem.

Maybe where you live, but no such thing happens where I live. So how dare you tell me what I do or do not know about where my child goes to school.

However, teachers are now required (not everywhere yet) to inspect home created meals and throw them out if they're “unhealthy.”

You're right about not every where - in fact it isn't even most places.

I personally have issues with gubmint’s healthy caloric intake and food pyramid.

I've never paid it a bloody bit of attention.

My kids are skinny and they eat all day long. They eat a lot of healthy fats, complex carbs, and large amounts of protein.

So? My household is no different. I''mm 5'10" and other than when I was pregnant have never weighed over 130# in my life. I actually still own and wear jeans I bought in high school, and I'll be attending my 35th class reunion in September.

We also eat real food; i.e., no processed prepared items. We make just about everything, including tortillas!

So do we, and we grow much of it as well. My daughter is 15 and she and her friends love to help in the garden and canning with me.

I'd be in jail if a teacher threw out my kids’ lunches!

So would I.

Full disclosure: I am a teacher.

So are all good parents.

42 posted on 07/11/2013 7:33:33 PM PDT by Gabz (Democrats for Voldemort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

My post was meant to add to the entire conversation thread. For whatever reason you have chosen to take it personally. Relax. Deep breaths. Save your anger for the lunch inspectors, because it is built into the program. Maybe if you’re lucky, your kids won’t be in school then. In fact, there was an uproar a few months ago about a North Carolina school throwing out a little girl’s home packed lunch. The school near Pittsburgh, were a relative teaches, has the same policy. The teachers hate it but it’s mandated. Just because it hasn’t happened to you personally does not mean that it doesn’t happen. Do you have beer or wine handy? Have one.


43 posted on 07/11/2013 7:46:45 PM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

True, the customer base at McD’s didn’t want healthy. However, I like Uno’s and they are packed every day at lunch, with a line to wait. They serve healthy food for a chain restaurant and people do want it.


44 posted on 07/11/2013 7:51:20 PM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Michelle belongs in a landfill along with all that wasted food.


45 posted on 07/11/2013 7:52:39 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( ==> sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta

For the most part, the children of taxpayers still have to pay their own way. So, taxpayers get hit twice - they pay for their own kids and for everybody else’s. That is what “fair” means in lib land.


46 posted on 07/11/2013 8:01:23 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX (All those who were appointed to eternal life believed. Acts 13:48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mware

OMG, I knew what that clip was before clicking on it.

Die-hard FReeper.


47 posted on 07/11/2013 9:16:14 PM PDT by bicyclerepair (Inbred, pedophile-worshipping, misogynists (mozlums) offend me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Literally throwing away large parts of school lunches has always been a first world problem in America. In my daughter’s high school, BEFORE any of these dietary changes were made... the only kids who ate the cafeteria lunch were getting free lunch. The food looks awful. I went to public school decades ago and remember the same thing, no one but the poor kids ate the food, so I don’t see how much has changed even with the healthier foods.

I for one, know that they could easily offer delicious and healthy foods instead of the over cooked glop that is traditional to school cafeterias. If the Admin rules have required a certain amount of fruit/vegetables I have a feeling the schools are meeting those requirements by dumping disgusting tasting canned vegetables in the food service trays.

Sorry, but I would rather my tax dollars went to subsidizing nutritious food... what this article is saying, is that the kids who have cars and can afford to buy food are not having to eat what they’re serving. It’s the poor kids who are going home hungry because they can’t stand the taste of the healthy choices.


48 posted on 07/12/2013 6:34:51 AM PDT by Katya (Homo Nosce Te Ipsum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
It's what happens when those at the "top" don't bother to mingle with the common folk and make decrees off the top of their heads. They know what's best without having to ask (and dirtying themselves by talking to "lesser" people).

It's the way of the Dems.

49 posted on 07/12/2013 9:31:10 AM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe; SheLion; Eric Blair 2084; -YYZ-; 31R1O; 383rr; AFreeBird; AGreatPer; Alamo-Girl; Alia; ...

Nanny State PING!

50 posted on 07/12/2013 5:08:47 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (I don't always vote, but when I do, I SURE AS HELL DON'T VOTE DEMOCRAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson