Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pennsylvania's Attorney General Refuses to Defend State's Gay Marriage Ban
Christian Post ^ | 07/11/2013 | Katherine Weber

Posted on 07/11/2013 6:06:05 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Pennsylvania's attorney general Kathleen Kane said Thursday that she will not be defending the state in a recent lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union regarding the state's ban on same-sex marriage.

Kane, a Democrat, has decided not to defend the state because she is a proponent of same-sex marriage, and therefore the responsibility to defend the state's same-sex marriage ban will now be passed to Republican Gov. Tom Corbett, who opposes same-sex marriage.

Pennsylvania law states that the attorney general may pass her responsibility to defend the constitutionality of state laws to the governor's office or executive branches, should it serve in the best interest of the state.

Corbett may now choose another state lawyer to defend the state's statute prohibiting same-sex marriage, passed in 1996 which defines marriage as being between one man and one woman.

"I cannot ethically defend the constitutionality of Pennsylvania's [law banning same-sex marriage], where I believe it to be wholly unconstitutional," Kane announced to reporters at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia on Thursday, according to The Associated Press.

Both Kane and Corbett were named in a lawsuit filed by the ACLU on Tuesday which seeks to overturn the state's law defining marriage as being between one man and woman.

The lawsuit also encourages the state to recognize out-of-state same-sex marriages; currently, Pennsylvania does not recognize same-sex marriage or civil unions.

A press release from the ACLU argues that the state's Defense of Marriage Act is "[violating] the fundamental right to marry, as well as the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment."

"Plaintiffs argue that the court should closely scrutinize this discriminatory treatment because the state's Defense of Marriage Act burdens the fundamental right to marry and because it discriminates based on sex and sexual orientation," the ACLU said in a statement.

The legal team is representing 23 state residents, including 10 same-sex couples, two minor children of those couples, and a widow whose partner of 29 years recently passed away.

Corbett's office has yet to comment on Kane's announcement, but the governor has previously expressed his opposition to same-sex marriage.

The lawsuit filed by the ACLU in Pennsylvania is one attempt among many on behalf of same-sex marriage advocates to have individual states overturn same-sex marriage bans following the June ruling by the Supreme Court that struck down a key provision of the federal Defense of Marriage Act.

The ACLU will also file lawsuits in Indiana, North Carolina, and Virginia.

Those supporting the traditional definition of marriage argue that legal teams such as the ACLU should not put the issue of same-sex marriage back into court, but rather put it up for a voter referendum on a ballot so the people of the state may decide.

Michael Geer, president of the Pennsylvania Family Institute, which opposes same-sex marriage, told The New York Times that putting the issue in court takes it out of the hands of the people.

"The fact the ACLU is turning to the courts to try to redefine marriage takes it out of the hands of the people," Geer said.

Proponents of same-sex marriage argue that because they believe their cause to be a civil rights issue, it should be addressed by the court, not the people.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: aclu; bhohomosexualagenda; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; kane; lawsuit; pennsylvania; rehash

1 posted on 07/11/2013 6:06:05 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We are no longer a nation of laws. This is not the United States of America as founded.


2 posted on 07/11/2013 6:08:40 PM PDT by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheel barrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
if it won't do it's job... fire the miserable wretch
3 posted on 07/11/2013 6:10:01 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We are a nation of thugs.

The republicans should now fail to enforce ALL affirmative action laws, union laws, obamacare and abortion laws.


4 posted on 07/11/2013 6:11:19 PM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chode

Governor Corbett can’t fire the Rat...in Pennsylvania, AG’s are elected officials and not appointed.


5 posted on 07/11/2013 6:17:57 PM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

this is the new liberal Alinsky tactic. By not defending the law in court, and based on the Supreme Court saying that nobody had standing to defend Proposition 8 from California, then judges are simply going to automatically rule for homosexual marriage.

Is anyone else alarmed by this tactic, aside from the issue of homosexual marriage? If the liberals get away with this, they can simply get a lawsuit going against a law they don’t like, refuse to defend it, then the court overturns a law becuase nobody has standing. Our legal system is hanging by a thread with liberals doing this.


6 posted on 07/11/2013 6:18:48 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m just thankful that the majority of states, around 35 States do recognize Marriage as ONLY being between 1 man and 1 woman. The majority of states recognize proper marriage, I think same sex marriage can be held off, I think the past year has mainly been a fad with a President trying to push this on the public. Eventually, I think normalcy will return and I think Illinois NOT redefining marriage is the beginning of the tide turning back in favor of Traditional Marriage.

P.S. I say “Traditional Marriage” but make no mistake, I think that is the only thing that is Marriage, 1 man and 1 woman.


7 posted on 07/11/2013 6:18:55 PM PDT by BeadCounter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We now official are ruled by Pirate Rules - more a set of guidelines to be followed when it suits us.

We are lead to this by our President, as the chief law enforcement presence in the nation.

We can now no longer tell our children the rules are meant to be followed until changed with an appropriate process. Now, they may be taught only to follow rules that they agree should be followed.

The rule of law is over.


8 posted on 07/11/2013 6:19:19 PM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
wonderful... willful misconduct means nothing anymore, i thought selective enforcement of the law was illegal
9 posted on 07/11/2013 6:22:05 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

the GOP should mention social issues much more instead of being cowards and we’ll see more republicans voted in.


10 posted on 07/11/2013 6:31:07 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

‘Sworn to defend the Law of the Land’/ not?


11 posted on 07/11/2013 6:31:07 PM PDT by bboop (does not suffer fools gladly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler; SeekAndFind

Impeach the beetch.


12 posted on 07/11/2013 7:01:42 PM PDT by lightman (Prosecute the heresies; pity the heretics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
Arrest her for dereliction of duty. And to all the NSA trolls, FU.
13 posted on 07/11/2013 7:37:33 PM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Is anyone else alarmed by this tactic, aside from the issue of homosexual marriage? If the liberals get away with this, they can simply get a lawsuit going against a law they don’t like, refuse to defend it, then the court overturns a law becuase nobody has standing.

Fortunately, we don't need to worry about that in this case. Pennsylvania law allows the governor to select another state lawyer to defend the law if the AG won't. So standing isn't an issue here, and Pennsylvania can defend itself to the hilt.

Also, don't forget that the House of Representatives was allowed to defend DOMA all the way to SCOTUS - if they were really going to gut standing, they would have done so in that case as well.

The only reason they used standing to kick the Prop 8 case was to avoid striking down the law outright. This was a cheap dodge, but at least it allowed other laws to stay on the books. A very bad decision, to be sure, but the best they could do under the circumstances. It was either that or gay marriage for all.
14 posted on 07/11/2013 7:57:34 PM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Isn’t it the AG’s legal obligation to do so?


15 posted on 07/11/2013 8:33:09 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Exactly what the activist “progressive” judges intended. Now they can ram gay marriage down everyone’s throats simply by opting out of defending it, since nobody else will be considered to have standing.


16 posted on 07/11/2013 8:34:20 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Corbett's office has yet to comment on Kane's announcement, but the governor has previously expressed his opposition to same-sex marriage...he said this afternoon that he was dismayed that she was failing to perform her official duties of defending a law which the legislature had passed, but that his legal team would take up the defense - time to impeach this newly elected AG......
17 posted on 07/11/2013 8:55:16 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Intolerant in NJ

The Supreme Court’s DOMA decision as Justice Scalia noted in his dissent invites a case from the states to come up to the Supreme Court for the Roe vs. Wade decision that would strike down any and all state laws that define marriage as a man and woman thing.

After the majority came in against DOMA we all now know that the redefinition of marriage nationally by the US Supreme Court is only a matter of the time it takes for the case to reach them.

Is this the case???????


18 posted on 07/11/2013 9:26:59 PM PDT by Nextrush (A BALANCED BUDGET NOW AND PRESIDENT SARAH PALIN ARE AT THE TOP OF MY LIST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Then she needs to resign. Her sworn duty is to defend the laws of her State.


19 posted on 07/11/2013 9:29:06 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“The ACLU will also file lawsuits in Indiana, North Carolina, and Virginia”

The people voted overwhelmingly on a Constitional amendment that defines marriage as one man one woman. ACLU can file lawsuits till their blue in the face.


20 posted on 07/11/2013 9:51:54 PM PDT by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Enough states have now banned gay marriage to implement a constitutional amendment: 1. 86% of Mississippi voters amend state constitution in 2001 2. 76% of Texas voters pass Proposition 2 3. 61% of North Carolina voters BAN gay marriage with Proposition 1 on May 7, 2012 4. 71.6% of Kentucky voters amend state constitution 5. 70% of Nebraska voters amend state constitution with Initiative 416 6. 69.4% of Nevada voters amend state constitution 7. 68% of Alaska�s voters amend state constitution 8. 66% of Hawaii legislators amend state constitution, 69% of voters endorsed that amendment 9. 61.4% of California voters pass Proposition 22 on March 7, 2000, then again 53% pass Proposition 8 in November 2009 10. 57% of Oregon voters reject the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force and amend their state constitution 11. 53.4% of Colorado Voters amend state constitution on November 3, 1993 12. Oklahoman voters made it a crime for a public official to issue gay marriage licenses 13. FEDERAL DOMA law passed on September 21, 1996 ends gay marriage 14. �Voters in Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon and Utah all approved anti-same-sex marriage amendments by double-digit margins�, per CNN
21 posted on 07/11/2013 9:57:54 PM PDT by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Wow, personally I am glad for her stance, this means someone that believes in the law can be appointed to defend it.

Per the article: Pennsylvania law states that the attorney general may pass her responsibility to defend the constitutionality of state laws to the governor's office or executive branches, should it serve in the best interest of the state.

Be glad she passed on it rather than saying she would defend it in a totally incompetent way.

22 posted on 07/12/2013 7:38:24 AM PDT by where's_the_Outrage? (Held my nose to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Intolerant in NJ; Salvation; narses; fatima; wagglebee; NYer
Corbett's office has yet to comment on Kane's announcement, but the governor has previously expressed his opposition to same-sex marriage...he said this afternoon that he was dismayed that she was failing to perform her official duties of defending a law which the legislature had passed, but that his legal team would take up the defense AG......

I'm not surprised in the least..

Governor Corbett's parish Priest is a personal frined.

Father tells me that when the Governor is home he rarely misses daily Mass.

23 posted on 07/12/2013 9:52:04 AM PDT by lightman (Prosecute the heresies; pity the heretics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Bump.


24 posted on 07/12/2013 10:22:52 AM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
Be glad she passed on it rather than saying she would defend it in a totally incompetent way.

I have to agree with you. I can't imagine Obama "defending" DOMA in federal court. He would have gotten Section 2 and 3 both thrown out by "defending" the law.

But why would this AG pass the opportunity to pretend to defend, then sabotage the defense, a law she doesn't like? Unless she is afraid of the Gaystapo.

25 posted on 07/12/2013 3:28:02 PM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson