Skip to comments.DEFENDING THE RELIGIOUS LIBERTY OF THOSE WHO DEFEND US
Posted on 07/12/2013 4:05:36 PM PDT by markomalley
If you go to the D-Day Memorial in Bedford, Virginia, you will see a moving tableau, a series of statues of the brave young Americans who stormed ashore on June 6, 1944 to liberate a continent from the grip of Adolf Hitler. One of these statues is called Death on the Shore.
It shows a soldier who was cut down as he left his landing craft. His Bible is seen falling out of his rucksack. That Bible included an endorsement from President Franklin D. Roosevelt. The body of this young man, one of the many from the little Southwest Virginia town of Bedford, was never found but his Bible was returned to his loving family. Bedford was chosen for the D-Day Memorial because it sacrificed more sons, proportionately, than any other American town on that Longest Day.
The rights for which that young soldier laid down his life include first religious freedom. Religious freedom is the first right protected in the Bill of Rights. Americans have cherished religious freedom since before we were an independent nation. That is why many of the original colonists came to America in the 17th and 18th centuries.
Those religious freedoms are very much at risk today. Under the Obama administration, there is an ongoing effort to suppress free speech and free exercise. The view of this administration is becoming clearer each day: Freedom of worship will be grudgingly tolerated, but try to live out your faith, try to share your faith in the public square and you face trouble.
My organization, Family Research Council (FRC), has combined with a broad spectrum of religious, social, and educational groups to alert Americans to a rising tide of hostility and discrimination faced by Christians and others in our all-volunteer military…
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Murder has a Disparate Impact on a minority group and is therefor Discriminatory.When are our courts ans legislatures going to do something to address this imbalance? When will they act to enforce the equalization of murder rates?
I have concluded that the real end game is to get rid of the military chaplaincy and not to simply change it.
My guess is that they want lawyers at every battalion to be political officers directing commanders in all their decisions.