The website for Florida Masonic District 006 has Tracy Martin listed as "District Grand Master".
Makes you wonder about his connections.
Posted on 07/13/2013 6:07:06 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
what exactly is the masonic lodge or masonics?
No, not Nancy Grace. Another annoying, blonde bimbo. HLN’s trademark re: trying to parrot Fox News re: the blonde commentators, perhaps?
I was on a totally ridiculous civil trial jury. We were unanimous in our thoughts about the facts,but even we asked a couple questions
“HLN screeching voice is Jane Velez Mitchell. You would screech too if you were a vegan alcoholic lesbian.”
Oh gads, that figures. Thanks for that.
Now at least I have a name to look out for and ‘avoid at all costs’!
The website for Florida Masonic District 006 has Tracy Martin listed as "District Grand Master".
Makes you wonder about his connections.
BTTT
Bttt
I’m back over here.
Bttt
Well if the jury goes by the (lack of) evidence and basically 2 defense cases that were presented it shold be a straight forward verdict of not guilty. I don’t see how you even come close to manslaughter on this.
I hate that he’s second guessing or Monday morning quarterbacking Mark O’Mara.
Me too.
Two live threads? Not good. imo, yours should be official based on previous faithful posting / hosting.
The one in sidebar was posted a bit earlier.
Regardless - again imo - one or the other should be locked
There are now five threads that claim to be watching and waiting for the verdict. We need consolidation
I’m getting really confused. And I haven’t had all of my coffee yet!
/johnny
I’m staying right here.
Get ‘em don-o!!!
Late as usual.. chasing bunnies out of vegetation.. voice doesn’t do it, you actually have threaten them physically.. FNC was saying they might not return a verdict til Monday, is that the concensus here so far?
Jurors are weird. Providing too much evidence of who Trayvon was might make jurors feel bad, and they might be inclined to dislike someone who makes them feel bad.
What's essential is that not only did TM and GZ "somehow" end up in a physical altercation where TM was clearly the instant victor (evidenced by the lack of melee injuries), but TM decided to continue to pummel GZ long after his victory was established. That would be sufficient grounds for a legitimate self-defense claim no matter who started the fight. The only way GZ could be legitimately be convicted would be for the jury to regard as implausible the notion that GZ might have been screaming for his life. Even if a jury might be inclined to believe that it might have been TM, there's no way the evidence establishes beyond a reasonable doubt that it wasn't GZ.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.