Skip to comments.
Green Energy’s Too Expensive (Title Needs Correction)
| July 14, 2013
| Marita Noon
Posted on 07/14/2013 11:21:50 AM PDT by Kaslin
On Wednesday, July 10, the House passed H.R. 2609which Bloomberg News called a $30.4 Billion Energy-Water Spending Measure. The 2014 Energy-Water Development appropriations bill will cut spending on renewables and other green energy programs in half and was passed mostly along party lineswith 4 Republicans voting against and 7 Democrats for it.
(Excerpt) Read more at finance.townhall.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: alternativeenergy; greenenergy; obama; windturbine
The correct title should be:Green Energy Is Too Expensive
posted on 07/14/2013 11:21:50 AM PDT
The “green” in “Green Energy” comes from the money poured into it, not it being better for the planet an all that.
posted on 07/14/2013 11:24:13 AM PDT
by Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
To: Smokin' Joe
'The green in Green Energy comes from the money poured into it, not it being better for the planet an all that.'
NOT SO FAST THERE S/J..let's at least give g. energy a CHANCE....IF WE JUST POUR SAY BETWEEN 100 AN 200 TRILLION MORE INTO IT..and it THEN doesn't pan out..i say SURE it aint feasible....until that time LET'S ROLLLL! (INTO NATIONAL BANKRUPTCY)
posted on 07/14/2013 2:28:18 PM PDT
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson