Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Was The New Evidence
July 14, 2013 | MosesKnows

Posted on 07/14/2013 3:29:26 PM PDT by MosesKnows

What Was The New Evidence?


I had not heard of what new evidence surfaced that caused a criminal charge.

I have heard that a sitting Grand Jury was bypassed to avoid them from reviewing the evidence.

I had more concern before Zimmerman's acquittal of all charges but the curiosity remains. If there wasn’t evidence for a charge right after the incident what changed four months later?

Was some power trying to suppress a charge or was some power trying to bring a charge?


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: blackkk; evidence; florida; georgezimmerman; new; trayvon; trayvonmartin; vanity; what; zimmerman
This didn’t enter my mind until the Zimmerman trial began but does anyone know what the new evidence was that surfaced four months after the event?
1 posted on 07/14/2013 3:29:26 PM PDT by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows

Evidence of the liberal mob getting wound up for a slander fest.


2 posted on 07/14/2013 3:30:31 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Skiddle-arink a-dink, a-dink, Skiddle-arink a-doo . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows

“Wookie’s don’t live on Endor “


3 posted on 07/14/2013 3:32:17 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows
Trayvon looked like Ubama's son, so therefore something had to be done.
4 posted on 07/14/2013 3:34:51 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Who knew that one day professional wrestling would be less fake than professional journalism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows

Is this worthy of a dedicated thread? You could have asked this same question on any of the trial threads.


5 posted on 07/14/2013 3:35:23 PM PDT by Hoodat (BENGHAZI - 4 KILLED, 2 MIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

“Wookie’s don’t live on Endor “

I know one that lives in DC


6 posted on 07/14/2013 3:36:09 PM PDT by max americana (fired liberals in our company after the election, & laughed while they cried (true story))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows

There was no additional evidence, just a liberal executive branch with a chip against white people on its shoulder.


7 posted on 07/14/2013 3:36:22 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

At least it wasn’t posted in Breaking News.


8 posted on 07/14/2013 3:36:56 PM PDT by Alex in chains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows

“If there wasn’t evidence for a charge right after the incident what changed four months later?”

The original (white) police chief Bill Lee decided that there was not enough evidence to charge Zimmerman, so the Black City Manager fired him and installed the new (Black) police Chief Cecil Smith. Smith has said publicly “ we heard the concerns of the 30,000 demonstrators so we have charged Zimmerman because we heard you.” Pure Black Racism on display for all to see! I just hope that Zimmerman sues everyone who has had anything to do with this kangaroo court process and any media outlets that have used yellow journalism to provoke a fight.


9 posted on 07/14/2013 3:37:10 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows

Apparently it was evidence that persuaded state prosecutors to violate GZ’s 5th Amendment rights, and jump straight to the persecution.


10 posted on 07/14/2013 3:42:35 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows

Pardon me...I’m looking for the picture of the bunny with the pancake on his head.


11 posted on 07/14/2013 3:44:39 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (I am a dissident. Will you join me? My name is John....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Seems it was worthy, there are a lot of responses, mostly articulate ones too.


12 posted on 07/14/2013 3:47:07 PM PDT by celmak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows

It’s Florida’s practice to require an indictment in a capital case. Not having a Grand Jury means there’s no indictment, and no indictment means there won’t be a capital murder charge. However, lesser charges remain in play.

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2012/04/ralph/special-prosecutor-dimisses-george-zimmerman-grand-jury/


13 posted on 07/14/2013 3:49:32 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( ==> sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows

You’re looking at this the wrong way. This wasn’t a criminal trial, it was a political show trial. Start thinking of it that way and everything will start making sense.


14 posted on 07/14/2013 3:51:21 PM PDT by randog (Tap into America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

15 posted on 07/14/2013 3:54:31 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows

St. Trayvon was 17.

He liked Skittles (in case you didn’t hear).

He was wearing a hoodie.

What else you need to know? To the left that is all that is needed to proclaim someone innocent.....even if they punched someone in the nose, took them to the ground and were bashing their head into concrete.


16 posted on 07/14/2013 3:54:53 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows
Was some power trying to suppress a charge or was some power trying to bring a charge?

Is this a rhetorical question? In other words, did you really have to ask? Where you been, boy?

17 posted on 07/14/2013 4:04:08 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Ecomics In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/econohttp://www.fee.org/library/det)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows

Zimmerman was charged with 2nd degree murder less than two months after the incident. I’m not sure what evidence was there when the charge was made nor what additional evidence if any was later developed. In support of the charges, the State filed an affidavit of probable cause, stating that Zimmerman profiled and confronted Martin and shot him to death while Martin was committing no crimes.

http://www.nbcmiami.com/news/George-Zimmerman-Not-a-Flight-Risk-Former-Attorney-146966625.html


18 posted on 07/14/2013 4:05:38 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows

Really?
The ONLY reason a charge was brought was because Holder and obama demanded it.


19 posted on 07/14/2013 4:05:47 PM PDT by svcw (Stand or die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randog
It was not yet a proper Show Trial because the State did not hăve control of the jury. That will come with the Federal Civil Rights Violation trial.
20 posted on 07/14/2013 4:07:13 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Ecomics In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/econohttp://www.fee.org/library/det)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

They’re not going to have control over a federal jury either. They are made up of the same pool of citizens as the State juries. This is a bad case for them, Holder would be well advised, from a tactical point of view, to let this one go. Much more to lose than to gain.

It’s coming out St. Skittles was not a choir boy, and that’s going to chase Holder off of this.


21 posted on 07/14/2013 4:23:13 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (I am a dissident. Will you join me? My name is John....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: deport

I think it was because the witch and her flying monkeys found more exculpatory evidence to withhold.


22 posted on 07/14/2013 4:23:52 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

23 posted on 07/14/2013 4:45:00 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Who knew that one day professional wrestling would be less fake than professional journalism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Mui Bueno!


24 posted on 07/14/2013 4:46:11 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (I am a dissident. Will you join me? My name is John....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: celmak
Seems it was worthy, there are a lot of responses, mostly articulate ones too.

You got it!


25 posted on 07/14/2013 4:48:12 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows
Was some power trying to suppress a charge or was some power trying to bring a charge?

They didn't need a conviction. Just a charge. Follow the money.

26 posted on 07/14/2013 4:52:23 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows

No evidence.
This prosecution was purely political. The Obama Regime makes a lot of mileage by enraging blacks.


27 posted on 07/14/2013 4:54:31 PM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

The trial threads are over, so some of us are “post-morteming.”

That’s normal. The question has general interest. We are now ready to go after the people and the process that lead to such a bad prosecution with otherwise pressing issues now behind.

I myself do not know the answer to the question despite studying this issue a lot. Do you? If so, tell us!

If you are having a bad day, I hope things get better.

“Please be nice to fellow Freepers.”


28 posted on 07/14/2013 5:04:38 PM PDT by Weirdad (Orthodox Americanism: It's what's good for the world! (Not communofascism!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance

(Thanks for that link to that article. If that’s not posted you ought to post it.)


29 posted on 07/14/2013 5:06:27 PM PDT by Weirdad (Orthodox Americanism: It's what's good for the world! (Not communofascism!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Weirdad
No new evidence supporting prosecution. Plenty of new evidence supporting not having a trial. Prosecutors downloaded 2000 photos from Martin's cell phone, and then ignored 6 separate discovery requests from the defense team, which in itself is grounds for disbarment.

Members of Eric Holder's Justice Department were the ones who pressured the state to prosecute. Prosecutors chose to forgo the grand jury at the recommendation of Justice Department. All this was covered again and again and again and again on the trial threads. The verdict thread alone should tell you everything you would ever want to know.

30 posted on 07/14/2013 5:31:24 PM PDT by Hoodat (BENGHAZI - 4 KILLED, 2 MIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows
http://www.renfordpbrowngl.org/district_006.html

31 posted on 07/14/2013 5:36:05 PM PDT by JoeProBono (Mille vocibus imago valet;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows
I think it was that hostile girl that had been on the cell phone with the kid that night. The Martin family couldn't get her to make a deposition but finally trapped/tricked her into talking so that they could call her as a witness. IMO when you bring a hostile/friendly witness to court, you get what you pay for.
32 posted on 07/14/2013 6:28:28 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

I already know everything you just wrote, and it’s from multiple sources, not just the threads.

(I appreciate your concise summary though.)

But did you REALLY cover EVERYTHING? Are you SURE? If you are really SO sure that EVERYTHING is already covered and summarized and clear and accessible and validated about this, GREAT, make that clear to everyone instead of just saying, in essence, “go do research” to people who might have, for all you know, been out of touch, doing a mission in Uganda!

(EVERYTHING! I can just hear Ed McMahon now, only older people are likely to get that...)

However, the subject of this thread (as I take it, being perhaps a little forgiving on the subject) in some ways is more of a rhetorical question, designed to promote a FreeRepublic RE-EXAMINATION of the issue.

That is the kind is MICROSCOPIC RE-EXAMINATION scrutiny that FreeRepublic does! Don’t try to stop us!

Sometimes an ARRAY of sensors honing in on an issue provides better resolution!

That is why I COMMENT when someone (you) basically DENIGRATES an effort to promote a “group array” to investigate an issue that (only) YOU think is “cut and dried” but that may NOT in fact be so “cut and dried”!!!

And it is right when when we are about to get down to the serious issue of the prosecution of criminal actions by public officials.

This is a good thread.


33 posted on 07/14/2013 7:20:23 PM PDT by Weirdad (Orthodox Americanism: It's what's good for the world! (Not communofascism!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

I love the frequent South Park references around here.

And hey, it makes as much sense as anything in the prosecution’s case!


34 posted on 07/14/2013 7:31:52 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows

Don’t be distracted. The Federal government is going to use sleight of hand, to keep our attention focussed on riots and demonstrations like the ones in Oakland, San Francisco and elsewhere, to try and give Boehner and Cantor breathing room to force amnesty for illegal aliens down our throats. DON’T LET THEM DO THIS!!


35 posted on 07/14/2013 10:20:10 PM PDT by Piranha (We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson