To: Noamie
This was neither clever, nor tricky.
Exactly. The fact that Holder says we have a "Duty to retreat" says that he doesn't think we have any right to defend ourselves at all.
8 posted on
07/17/2013 8:43:08 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: cripplecreek
Exactly. The fact that Holder says we have a "Duty to retreat" says that he doesn't think we have any right to defend ourselves at all. That's right, the only recourse we have is to report the incident to the Gestapo!
27 posted on
07/17/2013 8:59:02 AM PDT by
varon
(Down with tyranny)
To: cripplecreek
“Exactly. The fact that Holder says we have a “Duty to retreat” says that he doesn’t think we have any right to defend ourselves at all.”
The racist Holder forgets that Trayvon had as much opportunity to retreat as Zimmerman. He was beating the snot out of Zimmerman. He could have gotten up an walked away.
Both made equally bad choices that resulted in Trayvon’s death.
44 posted on
07/17/2013 9:14:13 AM PDT by
ryan71
(The Partisans)
To: cripplecreek
Exactly. The fact that Holder says we have a "Duty to retreat" says that he doesn't think we have any right to defend ourselves at all. Of course the government wants a duty to retreat
as recognized case-law, this gives them the excuse in no-knock raids that any resistance is unlawful regardless of the raid's own legitimacy.
58 posted on
07/17/2013 12:51:47 PM PDT by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson