Like believing the fossils point to evolution even though there is not one actual transitory fossil. Shouldn’t there be millions of mutated fossils turning a dog into a horse?
Some people just don’t have enough faith to believe in evolution.
Pray for America to Wake Up
“Shouldn’t there be millions of mutated fossils turning a dog into a horse?” ... Um, no. But Science may be on the lookout for a fossil which indicates the branching point where the mammals known as horses began to exist different from the branch which became dogs, eventually. Or the reverse, dogs branching from the line which became horses. That’s the way the concept works; if it is valid is not the question you asked however.
“..Shouldn’t there be millions of mutated fossils turning a dog into a horse?..”
yes, well, logic states there should be a clear line in the fossil record.
That is why they have artists drawing feathers on “dinosaurs” because they want to push that narrative.
(like Libs)