Skip to comments.New Royal baby 'is another blood-sucking British monarch' whose birth should not be celebrated..
Posted on 07/23/2013 8:34:21 AM PDT by Perdogg
The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge's newborn son will 'suck the blood' of Russia in the mid-21st century and should therefore not be celebrated, a controversial Russian politician declared today. Vladimir Zhirinovsky, the leader of the nationalist Liberal Democrat Party, declared 'I don't care about the heir' before accusing the British monarchy of 'destroying our state'. The outspoken politician made his attention-grabbing comments in an interview with the state-run newspaper Rio Novosti.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
A view shared by Colonial Revolutionaries. As well as the probable fact that the entire monarchic line from the beginning of the Tudors-— were never the rightful holders of the crown Deo Vindice.
No king but Jesus !
Zhirinovski has made a nice living for the past 25 years as the raving maniac in Russian politics. Outrageousness is his schtick. His zenith came in the 1991 elections for Russian president when he posed as a “liberal democrat” while very likely on the payroll of the KGB. For comparison imagine if the “pastor” of the Westboro Baptist Church, or Ed Schultz, had a seat in Congress.
The baby is clearly a racist pig who refuses to deliver justice for Trayvon.
AMEN, we need to take the lesson of Sal in this.
Is Christopher Hitchens still alive?
Not really, just hard-line fascists. Apparently, this clown is one of those who sees anything fun and joyous as a threat to Russia and its kleptocrats. He’d probably be the first to ban food trucks serving pulled pork BBQ.
Well one thing for sure — the kid is going to milk the situation for all its worth — atleast for awhile.
Just think; without the monarchy, the only cultural leadership they’d have would be from the Anglican Church, which thinks gay marriage and having sharia law in various parts of UK would be a nice thing, and people like Blair and Cameron — people the equivalent of Reverend Sharpton and President Obama.
See you are just keeping abreast of the news.
“Just another tuppence on the Inland Revenue.”/sarc
I find it interesting that the person who said it belonged to a party called the ‘Liberal Democrat’ party..
The monarchy would be more relevant if they’d give the monarch something to do.
The modern day equivalent of Tories, if they are in such need of a King. What,what?
But in russkieland Liberal Democrat might be a true conservative come to think of it. If they were US libs they’d be shocked at the comment, ie. since those are “tories” . Interesting twist which I got twisted.
IOW, she don't do doodly as far as actually governing the Kingdom.
'Tis well; He Majesty's democratically elected Parliament is doing a splendid job of screwing it all up royally.
I have no idea what this lunatic is talking about, but I sure do like where he gave the interview (if the picture is any indication). I’ll attend his press conferences all day.
It makes sense if you remember what the Russian commies did with their royals.
Who were the rightful holders?
If the choices are Brad and Angelina vs Queen Elizabeth and Prince Phillip, sorry Brad and Angelina...
Britain is run differently. I could care less.
I think their reverence for their royalty suits them.
I wouldn’t want that here, but then it wasn’t a part of our culture by choice to begin with. We escaped that and other cultures to come here and develop our own.
It’s pretty cheap compared to the Royals in the WH...
Hey, ganag! The new Royal baby not only has my birthday, but also, he's going to lead our Undead takeover of Russia in mid-century!
I don’t know if he’s going to suck Russian blood. But they are a waste of space and money. Never understood why the Common Wealth puts up with them, the primary purpose they serve is done by C list celebrities in America, they’re handy for ribbon cuttings at grocery stores and malls, but they cost a lot more.
Well, the Queen came out in favor of gays marrying, so we're down to Sharia, and I'm not really certain they Royals are on the right side of that issue, either.
Maybe if enough royals engage in gay marriage we can get rid of the line.
Can't remember if it was him or one of his brothers, sitting in the dugout, when his bench mate, picking his nose, pulls out a long clinger, and wipes it on Alou's jersey.
Alou had an epic germaphobe meltdown, running for the showers, almost as fast as Jesse Jackson or Chuckie Schumer running for a camera.
You mean like how it would be if Al Franken were a senator?
Zactly ... although Zhirinovsky is more talented.
Some of the weak and anti-American pray for a King.
If the baby was a girl, I was hoping that she would be named Nannette. Since it’s a boy, my suggestion is that he be named Morley or Doyle, after Morley Drury or Doyle Nave, star quarterbacks for the USC Trojans.
That guy is really weird.
IOW, he’s saying England could take over Russia in a sweet minute. Perhaps he could take his concerns to Putin.
If you don't want to celebrate the birth, don't. I guess you are mad because you didn't get an invite to the royal wedding!!
I guess they won't expect a baby gift from you!
“Some of the weak and anti-American pray for a King.”
Are some of you under the impression that you are channeling the founding fathers by lashing out at people that have done nothing to you, but mean a great deal to millions of people?
I would pray for the safety and health of Queen Elizabeth II, King Charles III, William V, and whomever this child will be known as.
She doesn’t come for or against anything. She signs what her “government” hands her, and reads the speeches they hand her. She reigns, not rules.
You must live in a cave. For a couple of centuries British royals have brought in billions just by virtue of being there and who they are.
Their romances, babies, scandals, weddings, divorces, funerals, coronations, blunders, jubilees, castles, carriages, pomp and circumstances, changings of the guard, crown jewels exhibits, you name it......have brought tourists by the millions to "this scepter'd isle" over time.
In a small island with few natural resources except the resilience of its people, the British national income generated by royals looms large in the country's economy.
My cousin, a British born citizen is retired in a London suburb after a career as an opera singer. He told me the world-famous Covent Garden Opera house is continually jammed with tourists.
By contrast, our country's royal families, disingenuously called "dynasties", generate no such interest or income by their celebrity, in fact, they probably repel tourists who would rather see a Florida highway alligator farm than catch views of the Emperor Obama, his consort Michelle Antoinette, his court of thugs and his 38 royal Czars.
“God Save the Queen, ‘cause tourists are money.”
Truthful post about the royals.
The only money British royals “bring in” is merchandising, like a rock band. And really there’s no reason they couldn’t still be doing that, rock bands do. But if they were cut lose then the people wouldn’t be providing them with all the land, and security, they’d have to buy it themselves. Then we’d find out how much money they really bring in.
Our “royal families” generate lots of revenue, because they’re mostly movie stars. Our royal families are the Houstons and the Barrymores and the Sheens. While ours probably aren’t any smarter than theirs at least our buy their own houses and pay their own security.
Sorry pal, as an American I don’t do Kings And Queens.
I didn’t say that you should be ruled by one or care. But calling someone “anti-American” for praying for the safety and health of someone like Queen Elizabeth, Pope Francis, Prince Albert or King Wilhelm-Alexander, is just beyond silly.
“The only money British royals bring in is merchandising, like a rock band. And really theres no reason they couldnt still be doing that, rock bands do. But if they were cut lose then the people wouldnt be providing them with all the land, and security, theyd have to buy it themselves. Then wed find out how much money they really bring in.”
The True Cost of the Royal Family Explained:
All you Brit appeasers on Free Republic need a lesson on global economics and the soap opera financier antics of the City of London. There are books on the subject, most of them on Amazon. Ignorance is no excuse in the electronic era. I’d suggest that Freepers of all points on the compass peruse the valuable contents of this web site:
During the War for Independence from Great Britain, John Adams was at the top of King George, iii’s list of traitors to be hung, drawn and quartered. After the war, John Adams was made the first U.S. ambassador to Great Britain. And he, his wife, Abigail and their children took great effort to dress grandly for their presentation to the King and Queen at the Court of St. James. The meeting itself took much less time then it took each of the Adams to prepare themselves to meet their former sovereigns.
Make that “All you Brit ROYALTY appeasers...” The British people themselves are inventive, studious and courageous in their bones.
The princeling is olde school! We new school!