Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feds: Transgender teen may use boys' locker room ^ | 07/24/2013 | By NIRVI SHAH

Posted on 07/24/2013 10:40:31 PM PDT by redreno

The U.S. Justice and Education departments said Wednesday that a transgender California student who is anatomically female but lives life as a male must be able to use school bathrooms, locker rooms and other facilities designed for boys.

The first-of-its-kind decision from the agencies tasks the Arcadia school district outside Los Angeles to change district policies and practices to accommodate the rising ninth-grade student. Teachers and staff must be trained in how to prevent gender discrimination, and federal agencies will be keeping tabs on the district through at least 2016.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: arcadia; california; corruption; democrats; education; governmentschools; govtabuse; homosexualagenda; liberalism; moralabsolutes; queer; sourcetitlenoturl; transgender; transvestite; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: redreno
"anatomically female." For everyone else who just wants straight information without the shell game, that means "female".
21 posted on 07/24/2013 11:46:58 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69
What's interesting is that a boy who wants to play "girl" and go into the girl's locker room will be screamed at, if not assaulted.

When a girl wants to play "boy" goes into the boy's locker room, it'll get the showing of a lifetime.

I bet there are several boys who would dig this.

22 posted on 07/24/2013 11:56:50 PM PDT by boop ("You don't look so bad, here's another")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Stormdog
At that point, even she (it) would have to admit that the absurd charade is over.


You really can not be unaware that boys do rape other boys on occasion?

Even if that were untrue the gay/liberal agenda has gotten quite adept at teaching our youth to ignore unpleasant facts.

23 posted on 07/24/2013 11:58:44 PM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kelly4c

It is marxism-—to make perversion “normal”-—to condition children-—to sexualize them-—they are forced to ‘think” and be told sexual cr*p-—to corrupt their worldview and be exposed to absurd, immoral, irrational ideas.

It is throwing out Christian Ethics and replacing it with Satanic Ethics (Religion of Ba’al). The NWO needs Christianity erased in the minds of the children——sexualizing them and removing Reason and Logic and Truth-—is how they do it.

They create artificial worlds where “Up is Down”. It destroys Logic and Reason and these kids will believe whatever cr*p their told-—the public schools are conditioning/brainwashing factories to eliminate Virtue.

Without Virtue—there is no Freedom (Socrates).

24 posted on 07/25/2013 12:00:33 AM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: redreno

The good news is no kid changes or shiwers in the locker rooms anymore.....too many cell phone cameras around so they do it all at home

25 posted on 07/25/2013 12:02:31 AM PDT by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig (It is going to be Foot to Ass combat on election foot and a Rat's ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Wednesday’s resolution is the latest in a series of actions by the Obama administration sending a message to schools about the treatment of LGBT students. The White House has hosted bullying summits on the issue.

Just an example of a transgender.

26 posted on 07/25/2013 12:13:33 AM PDT by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
and when she gets raped or some boy sees her naked female body ???

I doubt that will happen (remember, she's pretending to be a BOY), and as far as seeing her naked body, society would be better off if we weren't so uptight about non sexual nudity.

In many other countries, nudity is more accepted, and I believe they have less of a problem with men who can't keep it in their pants because a woman wore a low cut dress.

However, our 'dear leaders' over here are not interested in having a mature and intelligent society.

So... we get silly crap like this. Boys who are excused from a little 'self control' because an unshapely female who dresses like a male and acts like one, wants to pee in a urinal.

What the boys should do is laugh, but ..... that would probably get them expelled and sued.

27 posted on 07/25/2013 12:22:24 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: redreno

and when a real boy gets this fake “boy” pregnant ....?

28 posted on 07/25/2013 12:22:47 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


What is non-sexual about trannies and gays? Everything is about sex to them. Our society constantly tells people and kids to be sluts, of course this is sexual.

29 posted on 07/25/2013 12:23:53 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


people who make laws and rules like this should be run out of town on a rail

30 posted on 07/25/2013 12:24:47 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
Boys Don't cry
31 posted on 07/25/2013 12:39:27 AM PDT by Cronos (Latin presbuteros>Late Latin presbyter->Old English pruos->Middle Engl prest->priest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie

If I weren’t a spiritual person I wouldn’t know what to make of it. I guess I know where it’s all heading, I’ve read the Book, yet I can’t help but wonder why folks seem to so easily go along with it. God warned us and I can only thank Him that He gave me eyes to “see.” I hope and pray that many others’ eyes are opened as well.

32 posted on 07/25/2013 12:39:39 AM PDT by kelly4c (
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
The U.S. Government is working hard at turning America’s children into a bunch of freaks.

There is a bright side. Pretty much everything that happens in America is a generational thing. Thus, when we had the Cindy Sheehan "Peace Mom" stuff in the early 00's, it was grown up anti-war '60s kids that made that happen. Presently, everyone seems to be going crazy about sex stuff, which indicates the sex-drenched disco-era (Carter Administration) '70s group is in power. Next up -- thankfully -- are the '80s Ronald Reagan generation, and their hallmark is pretty much traditional values and a disdain for BS. As an observer of the social scene for a lonnnnnng time, I really do feel that the '70s influence is beginning to wane. I encounter more and more pragmatic former '80s kids daily, who exhibit healthy cynicism and a respect for America's traditions, which they see as under fire. This will be VERY interesting to watch over the next few years ...

33 posted on 07/25/2013 12:44:59 AM PDT by JennysCool (My hypocrisy goes only so far)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


But the only time we really see someone else nude is when we ourselves are having sex, or other people are (or about to or just have) in the movies. It’s true if you think about it. (Unless you’re a doctor.) So nudity does equate with sex.

But then you’ll say I’m just proving your point I know. So, if we were to decide that our future generations be desensitized to nudity at what age do you think they should become exposed and whose naked bodies should they be exposed to? I understand the concept, I do. I was raised in a time where as a young girl I went to church every Sunday surrounded by women in long dresses and preached to regarding the importance of pureness and modesty and parents who reinforced that concept to the extent I could not come out of my bedroom with just my nightgown on, had to cover with a robe. Was told it was not “appropriate” in front of brothers and father. Imagine my suprise when now hubby’s 15 yr. old neice spent the night and came to watch a movie in our living room with just a t-shirt that didn’t quite cover her underwear. I found out her family, mom, dad and brothers walked around in their bra/underwear pretty regularly and I was shocked lol.

34 posted on 07/25/2013 1:02:01 AM PDT by kelly4c (
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TontoKowalski; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; ...


35 posted on 07/25/2013 3:08:50 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's no coincidence that some "conservatives" echo the hard left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: redreno

And I’d note that parents continue to send their kids to a government school in the first place. It’s not like they haven’t been warned several times of these kind of shenanigans. Welfare dependency is deeply entrenched in our society. Amazing what people will endure for tax paid daycare.

Cue the “b-but my school is a GOOD government school!” apologists.

36 posted on 07/25/2013 3:11:05 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat (GOTS: Food, water, guns, ammo, useful skills, cash, and precious metals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redreno

So, let me guess...

They want to let 14 and 15 year old boys use the girls locker rooms as long as they “self identify” their gender preference to be female?

What could possibly go wrong?

37 posted on 07/25/2013 3:14:44 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

“whatever happened to?....”

Oh, that’s an easy question. All the things listed are no longer relevant.

“somebody smarter than me has to figure a way out of all this krap”

Don’t know if I’m smarter, I wouldn’t assume to be. But I might suggest that there really isn’t a way out in the larger sense. We’re at that stage where taking care of our own is the priority. Remember that at a certain point Lot had to decide to follow God and leave the denizens of sodom and gomorrah to their fate.

See tagline.

38 posted on 07/25/2013 3:19:48 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat (GOTS: Food, water, guns, ammo, useful skills, cash, and precious metals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: redreno

I’m taking a poll. Is California Sodom or Gomorrah?

I suspect our Lord is not pleased.

39 posted on 07/25/2013 3:30:57 AM PDT by upchuck (To the faceless, jack-booted government bureaucrat who just scanned this post: SCREW YOU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: informavoracious

Indeed. I can see how those going in the other direction could use ladies’ facilities with discretion—as all business is done behind a closed door.

But for someone with female plumbing trying to ‘pass’ in the men’s room? That’s another story.

40 posted on 07/25/2013 3:37:01 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson