Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton could handle things ‘even better’ than her husband did, says Reid
The Hill ^

Posted on 07/25/2013 9:27:07 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Hillary Clinton could handle things ‘even better’ than her husband did, says Reid By Justin Sink - 07/25/13 11:13 AM ET

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said in an interview aired Wednesday that he believed former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton could "handle things probably even better" than her husband, former President Bill Clinton, if she’s elected to the White House.

"Hillary Clinton may have a bigger fan than Harry Reid; I just don’t know who it would be," Reid told PBS’s “NewsHour.” "I think that what she did as a senator, what she did as secretary of State will go down in history books as a remarkable, remarkable job that she did."

"I, of course, have such admiration for the president," Reid said of Bill Clinton's tenure in the White House. "Remember, the last three or four years, he was here we reduced the debt and created 22 million jobs – pretty good deal. And I think that they’re a pretty good team, but she’ll handle things probably even better than he did."

That statement caused anchor Judy Woodruff to ask if he was sure Clinton would do "even better."

"Oh, yeah," Reid responded.

Asked if he would like to see Clinton seek the Democratic nomination in 2016, Reid indicated that he did.

"I don’t know what more I can say than, to be a cheerleader for, than what I’ve already said in this interview," he said.

Clinton has not yet said whether she will run, but early polls show her as the clear favorite on the Democratic side.

According to a poll released by McClatchy-Marist on Wednesday, she is the choice of 63 percent of Democratic primary voters, versus 13 percent for Vice President Biden. No other candidate pulls more than 6 percent of primary voters.

This story was updated at 11:55 a.m.


TOPICS: Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS:
Handle what?
1 posted on 07/25/2013 9:27:07 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

yeah- HillaryCare was such a rousing success!


2 posted on 07/25/2013 9:29:12 AM PDT by Mr. K (4 election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Harry Reid and Bill Clinton are dating?
Who would have guessed.


3 posted on 07/25/2013 9:29:14 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Almost everything that Dirty Harry says doesn’t make a bit of sense.


4 posted on 07/25/2013 9:29:30 AM PDT by PATRIOT1876 (The only crimes that are 100% preventable are crimes committed by illegal aliens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

What, interns? Doubtful.


5 posted on 07/25/2013 9:30:08 AM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I have heard that about lesbians.


6 posted on 07/25/2013 9:30:57 AM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Yeah, Bill Clinton handled everything so well.

For those who may have forgotten what kind of a President Bill Clinton was:

1) Clinton’s own words show his often expressed innate hostility to, and utter contempt for, the core principles of the American founding:

``If the personal freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution inhibit the government’s ability to govern the people, we should look to limit those guarantees.’’ -- President Bill Clinton, August 12, 1993

``The purpose of government is to reign in the rights of the people’’ –- Bill Clinton during an interview on MTV in 1993

``We can’t be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans…that we forget about reality.’’ -- President Bill Clinton, quoted in USA Today, March 11, 1993, Page 2A, ``NRA change: `Omnipotent to powerful’’’ by Debbie Howlett

“When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of individual freedom to Americans, it was assumed that the Americans who had that freedom would use it responsibly… that they would work for the common good, as well as for the individual welfare… However, now there’s a lot of irresponsibility. And so a lot of people say there’s too much freedom. When personal freedom’s being abused, you have to move to limit it.” – Bill Clinton, April 19, 1995

2) Clinton inevitably pursued his own political advantage at the expense of American interests and national security. Here is just one of many possible examples:

It is well documented that Clinton and the Democrats took illegal campaign money from groups and individuals tied directly to the Chinese People’s Republican Army. It is therefore not surprising that In January 1998 Clinton went against the advice of then-Secretary of State Warren Christopher and Pentagon experts by lifting long-standing restrictions against the export of American satellites to China for launch on Chinese rockets. Not only did he move control over such decisions from the more security-focused State Department to the Commerce Department, but he intervened in a Justice Department investigation of Loral Space & Communications, retroactively enabling Loral to sell critical missile technology to the Chinese. Interestingly enough, Clinton’s decision was made at the request of Loral CEO Bernard Schwartz, whose earlier $1.3 million campaign donation made him the single biggest contributor to the Democratic election effort.

The result, as stated eloquently by syndicated columnist Linda Bowles, was that “the Democrats got money from satellite companies and from Chinese communists; China got supercomputors, advanced production equipment and missile technology; Loral got its satellites launched at bargain basement prices . . . and the transfer of sensitive missile technology gave China [for the first time] the capability of depositing bombs on American cities.” Incidentally, Loral ultimately failed to benefit from this permanent injury to America’s security interests: in July 2003, the company filed for bankruptcy protection, and in order to raise cash was forced to sell its most profitable business – a fleet of communications satellites orbiting over North America.

3) On two occasions, Clinton used military action for the specific purpose of distracting the American public from the fallout of the Lewinsky affair:

• On August 20, three days after Clinton finally admitted publicly to the Lewinsky affair, the news media was poised to focus on that day’s grand jury testimony by Monica Lewinsky. That same morning, Clinton personally went on national television to gravely announce his bombing of a Sudanese “chemical weapons factory,” and a terrorist training camp in Afghanistan. It was the first time most Americans ever heard the name of Osama bin Laden. The factory bombing in Sudan killed an innocent night watchman, but accomplished little else. It later was proven that the plant was making badly needed pharmaceuticals for people in that poverty-stricken part of the world, but no chemical weapons.

Several months later, the U.S. Center for Nonproliferation Studies, part of the Monterey Institute of International Studies, stated: "...the evidence indicates that the facility had no role whatsoever in chemical weapons development." Kroll Associates, one of the world's most reputable investigative firms, also confirmed that there was no link in any way between the plant and any terrorist organization. As for the Afghanistan bombing, it failed to do any damage at all to bin Laden or his organization. Clinton’s action was accurately characterized by George W. Bush when he said right after 9-11: "When I take action, I’m not going to fire a $2 million missile at a $10 empty tent and hit a camel in the butt.

Clinton’s pointless and murderous military actions did not make Americans safer that day, although they did destroy an innocent life, and for all the good they did certainly could have been delayed in any case. But they did succeed in diverting media attention from Lewinsky’s grand jury testimony for a 24-hour news cycle, which was the main point. So I guess, they weren’t a total loss.

•On December 16, 1998, on the eve of the scheduled House vote on his impeachment, Bill Clinton launched a surprise bombing attack on Baghdad. As justification for this exploit, he cited the urgent threat that Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction posed to America, and the need for immediate action. Almost immediately, the House Democrats held a caucus and emerged calling for a delay in the impeachment proceedings. House minority leader Dick Gephardt made a statement: "We obviously should pass a resolution by saying that we stand behind the troops. I would hope that we do not take up impeachment until the hostilities have completely ended."

Conveniently, a delay so near the end of the House term would have caused the vote to be taken up in the next session – when the newly elected House membership would be seated with more Democratic representation, thereby improving Clinton’s chances of dodging impeachment.

The Republicans did, in fact, agree to delay the hearings, but only for a day or two. Amazingly, Clinton ended the bombing raid after only 70 hours -- once it became clear that in spite of the brief delay, the vote would still be held in the current session.

Once the bombing stopped, Clinton touted the effectiveness and importance of the mission. As reported by ABC News : “We have inflicted significant damage on Saddam's weapons of mass destruction programs, on the command structures that direct and protect that capability, and on his military and security infrastructure,” he said. Defense secretary William Cohen echoed the point: “We estimate that Saddam's missile program has been set back by at least a year.”

Whether or not one buys Clinton’s assessment of that mission, it is difficult to believe that its timing was so critical that it required commencement virtually at the moment the House was scheduled to vote on the impeachment. I think the most reasonable conclusion is that Clinton cynically deployed US military assets and placed military personnel in harm’s way for purely political reasons.

4) Clinton’s reckless sexual behavior was a threat to American national security:

Clinton and his supporters have been very effective in persuading large numbers of Americans that the Lewinsky scandal was “only about sex.” But I see a bigger issue here, because Clinton is on record as saying that he would have done anything to keep knowledge of the Lewinsky affair from becoming public.

To me, that statement raises a very serious question: What if, instead of sending her recorded Lewinsky conversations to Ken Starr, Linda Tripp had instead secretly offered them for sale, say, to the Chinese government? Or to the Russians? Or even to agents of Saddam?

What kind of blackmail leverage would those tapes have provided to a foreign government in dealing with America on sensitive trade, security or military issues? One of the few things Clinton ever said that I believe is that he would have done anything to keep the Lewinsky affair secret. Given his demonstrated track record of selling out American interests for personal or political gain (and there are more examples that I could have cited here), how far would he have gone in compromising America’s real interests in order to protect his own neck when threatened with blackmail?

Pretty far, I believe. Equally distressing is the prospect Clinton might, in fact, have succumbed to foreign black mail on other occasions in order to hide different sexual episodes that ultimately did not become public. There is no way to know, of course, but I prefer presidents for whom such a scenario is not a plausible possibility.

And don’t even get me started on the war crime in Kosovo.

WAR IN KOSOVO

During Bill Clinton’s 1999 NATO-led war in Kosovo – which according to some estimates cost as much as $75 billion – we bombed Belgrade for 78 days, killed almost 3,000 civilians, and shredded the civilian infrastructure (including every bridge across the Danube.)

We devastated the environment, bombed the Chinese embassy, came very close to engaging in armed combat against Russian forces, and in general, pursued a horrific and inhumane strategy to rain misery on the civilian population of Belgrade in order to pressure Milosevic into surrendering.

Why did we do all that? The US did not even have an arguable interest in the Balkans, and no one ever tried to claim that Serbia represented any kind of threat to our nation or our interests.

But for months the Clinton administration had told us that Milosevic was waging a vicious genocide against Albanian Muslims, and needed to be stopped. The New York Times called it a “humanitarian war.” In March 1999 – the same month that the bombing started – Clinton’s State Department publicly suggested that as many as 500,000 Albanian Kosovars had been murdered by Milosevic’s regime. In May of that year, as the bombing campaign was drawing to a close, Secretary of Defense William Cohen lowered that estimate 100,000.

Five years after the bombing, after all the forensic investigations had been completed, the prosecutors at Milosevic’s “War Crimes” trial in the Hague were barely been able to document a questionable figure of perhaps 5,000 “bodies and body parts.” During the war, the American people were told that Kosovo was full of mass graves filled with the bodies of murdered Albanian Muslims. But none were ever found.

BILL CLINTON ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE

During the election cycle of 1992, George H.W. Bush lost his job after Bill Clinton hammered him relentlessly for having caused the “worst economy of the last 50 years.”

In fact, as CNN’s Brooke Jackson has reported: “Three days before Christmas 1992, the National Bureau of Economic Research finally issued its official proclamation that the recession had ended 21 months earlier. What became the longest boom in U.S. history actually began nearly two years before Clinton took office.” See (See http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/10/31/jackson.recession.primer.otsc/).

By the same token, Clinton is generally perceived as having a stellar economic record during his own presidency, in spite of the fact that the economy was already starting to decline during the last year of his term after the stock market crashed in March 2000.

According to a report by MSNBC: “The longest economic expansion in U.S. history faltered so much in the summer of 2000 that business output actually contracted for one quarter, the government said Wednesday in releasing a comprehensive revision of the gross domestic product. Based on new data, the Commerce Department said that the GDP — the country’s total output of goods and services — shrank by 0.5 percent at an annual rate in the July-September quarter of 2000.” See: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3676690/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/t/gdp-figures-revised-downward/.

7 posted on 07/25/2013 9:31:21 AM PDT by Maceman (Just say "NO" to tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

All we need to know about Hillary is that Bill Clinton called her his “moral compass.”


8 posted on 07/25/2013 9:32:15 AM PDT by Maceman (Just say "NO" to tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Handle what?

The Muslim Brotherhood, Black Panthers, Unions, Commie Professors, the Economy, Scandals, Libturd Press, and of course, Healthcare.

Even better? It all depends on how 'even better' is defined.

9 posted on 07/25/2013 9:33:12 AM PDT by Slyfox (Without the Right to Life, all other rights are meaningless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Hope she’s in jail by then.


10 posted on 07/25/2013 9:35:00 AM PDT by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Well, ...Hillary handled Huma better than Weiner.


11 posted on 07/25/2013 9:35:47 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

In 2008, I remember thinking that I would prefer Hillary to Obama, but after her dreadful stint as Secretary of State, I believe she would have been worse.

Bill Clinton was a politician without conviction, which is preferable to Obama, who is an ideologue.

Hillary is simply an idiot. She ran a horrible campaign in 2008, and was an embarrassing SOS. Think of all the blunders: reset button with Russia, calling Assad a reformer, Benghazi, the video...

Stupidity and blind ambition is a dangerous combination, and that is precisely what Hillary offers.


12 posted on 07/25/2013 9:39:54 AM PDT by Retired Greyhound (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

God help us all.


13 posted on 07/25/2013 9:40:09 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Face it, Hillary is a bimbo.

That’s right.

Bimbo.

Name one thing this incompetent wench has done that could even remotely be considered a success.

She boinked her way into fame...because there is nothing else she could do.

And yes, Bubba had (and has) absolutely no taste...or class.


14 posted on 07/25/2013 9:40:17 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

WHAT do these people have on each other? I swear they must have ALL had to commit some insanely reprehensible act in order to join this vile inner circle of Satanists!


15 posted on 07/25/2013 9:40:22 AM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Hell, she’d probably have more girls in the Oval Office than Bill. Or is that Oval Orifice?


16 posted on 07/25/2013 9:44:40 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Well check his teeth for stray hairs.


17 posted on 07/25/2013 9:45:13 AM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I suspect hillary’s an islamist.


18 posted on 07/25/2013 9:47:03 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Handle what?
+++++++++
Things like the Vince Foster murder, the TWA 800 Coverup, keeping Monica Lewinski happy. Stuff like that.


19 posted on 07/25/2013 9:48:04 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“I think that what she did as a senator, what she did as secretary of State will go down in history books as a remarkable, remarkable job that she did.”

What did she do as a senator? In addition, I agree, the Benghazi cover-up was certainly remarkable!


20 posted on 07/25/2013 9:51:39 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"I think that what she did as a senator, what she did as secretary of State will go down in history books as a remarkable, remarkable job that she did

Huh ??

Senate Voting Record

From Jan 2001 to Jan 2009, Clinton missed 249 of 2,616 roll call votes, which is 9.5%. This is worse than the median of 2.0% among the lifetime records of senators serving in Jan 2009.

Achievements as Sec of State

5-top-highlights-in-hillary-clinton-s-secretary-of-state-tenure It appears she saved a Chinese dissident and approved the bombing of Ghadaffi in Libya.

(Which turned out so well for our ambassador)

21 posted on 07/25/2013 9:52:10 AM PDT by Timocrat (Ingnorantia non excusat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

You have to remember it was Harry Reid who said that which means absolutely NOTHING of importance. What an ass hat.


22 posted on 07/25/2013 9:52:21 AM PDT by DaveA37 (I'm for SMALLER , HONEST government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Yeh, just imagine the mess that would have taken place in BENGHAZI if old Bill was in charge.


23 posted on 07/25/2013 9:52:34 AM PDT by spawn44 (MOO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Liberals: Just when you thought insanity couldn’t get more insane.

Let’s see Hitlerys resume:

1. Corrupt lawyer.

2. Involved in two of the most corrupt Presidential administrations in US history, one of which was unconstitutionally elected.

3. Accomplished absolutely nothing as Senator of New York.

4. Unmitigated disaster as Secretary of state.

Yes! Absolutely, primo candidate for POTUS!


24 posted on 07/25/2013 9:53:10 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Someday our schools will teach the difference between "lose" and "loose")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Vomit photo of the day...


25 posted on 07/25/2013 9:55:38 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Someday our schools will teach the difference between "lose" and "loose")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Bribes


26 posted on 07/25/2013 9:57:55 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
And why not? Hitlery ran Billy's presidency from behind the scenes pulling all the strings, getting things done. Billy just wanted to President because he thought it would be such a cool "job", like his hero, JFK.

Billy was just a good ol' boy, so he wasn't much of a danger to the US, plus, he really had no agenda. King Zero has had an agenda all along: to destroy America for his communist, marxist, muslim benefactors.

Hitlery won't be as bad as Zero, but Zero has the goods on Hitlery (Benghazi, among who-knows-what-else?), so he'll pull the strings from afar and get her to jump through hoops for him.

We're in for a very bad decade, America. Bad things are gonna' happen unless conservatives can get it together and get organized. Either kick the RINO's out of the Repub party, or start our own (or take over another party).

Just my lil' own opinion. (Hi there, NSA!!!).

27 posted on 07/25/2013 10:01:14 AM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
For heaven sakes, people, keep pointing out that she was disbarred because of her misconduct as a lawyer in Watergate. She has been investigated many times over mishandling money (Whitewater-gate, cattle futures trading, and Travel-gate), and so many witnesses died violently-oops-just before they would have testified. Vincent Foster, her former boyfriend, being the best known among them.
Then there is Benghazi-gate. Oh, what does it matter now? The 4 main victims are dead, so they can't testify against her. The survivors have been asked (forced?)to sign confidentiality agreements, so apparently she feels it's safe to ignore.
28 posted on 07/25/2013 10:04:49 AM PDT by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

What is this? The MB push for us to support weiner in favor of Huma as pur future queen?

Hillary II

New Yorkers could consider themselves part of our country and spare us this and their dangerously wimpy capitulation to communism and islam

But they won’t

They’re so evolved

Im just not averting attention from this power grab


29 posted on 07/25/2013 10:07:50 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Handle what?

Cigars.

30 posted on 07/25/2013 10:10:06 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Like she handled the records from her Health Care Task Force? Yeah, we need us some more of that.


31 posted on 07/25/2013 10:15:25 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

Thank you for the information.


32 posted on 07/25/2013 10:18:06 AM PDT by mykroar (China and Russia are playing chess while Obamas's playing 52 card pick-up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I don’t know which is scary. 63% of democrats prefer Hillary or 13% prefer Biden.


33 posted on 07/25/2013 10:20:57 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican (If you vote for evil because you can't see evil, you ARE evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Yeah, like Benghazi.

Not only what that a botched job, the lying to cover it up was truly transparent government.

She could not run a 7-11 with a profit.


34 posted on 07/25/2013 10:21:19 AM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Foster was handled very well.


35 posted on 07/25/2013 10:28:03 AM PDT by bgill (This reply was mined before it was posted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I have to hand it to the Sink Emperor - he obviously has a very good understanding of how things really work in DC.


36 posted on 07/25/2013 10:28:03 AM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Hillary and Harry are drinking buddies again


37 posted on 07/25/2013 10:47:21 AM PDT by molson209
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: molson209

Reid!...You ignorant slut!


38 posted on 07/25/2013 10:51:09 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I wish that old crook would just fade away. (Reid, I mean)


39 posted on 07/25/2013 11:21:04 AM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

And things have gone so well with her as Secretary of States. Just look at how calm the Middle East is.

Harry Reid is a detestable crook. Why do the voters of NV keep forcing him on the rest of us?


40 posted on 07/25/2013 11:41:44 AM PDT by Pining_4_TX (All those who were appointed to eternal life believed. Acts 13:48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

And Obama’s dog Bo could handle things better than Obama di. So what? Why measure against such low standards?


41 posted on 07/25/2013 12:46:38 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson