This woman did her job. She studied the evidence and it changed her mind. She voted to acquit. She also told the interviewer that she tought the case should never have been brought in the first place due to lack of evidence, and that she felt the whole trial was a huge publicity stunt. For a black single mother of eight kids, I’d say this woman deserves accolades rather than the abuse she’s getting.
Then how does she say that he got away with murder? And, if it was a publicity stunt, and that due to lack of evidence the case should have never been brought in the first place, then how did she vote for 2nd degree murder at all? The fact that she’s showing her face and using any name at all tells me that she’s trying to curry favor with someone.
I agree. Even though she FELT something otherwise, she did what she was supposed to as a good juror and voted by the law.