Skip to comments.Pentagon considering affirmative action in combat
Posted on 07/26/2013 9:39:55 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Senior military personnel are considering now giving women different military training than men, The Washington Times reports.
The effort was proposed by Massachusetts Democrat Rep. Niki Tsongas at a recent House Armed Services Committee hearing because so far, she says training systems do not maximize the success of women.
Though the armed services have promised that combat standards will be the same regardless of gender, senior officers are considering initially separate training systems.
Army Lt. Gen. Howard Bromberg, serving as deputy chief of staff for personnel, considers separate training programs to be more about considering all soldiers as individuals, citing a need to explore how the training process works.
Were not looking at it just for the integration of women, Bromberg said. Were looking at it for the total soldier, because just as you have a 110-pound male who may lack some type of physiological capability or physical capability, he or she may both need to be trained differently. Were trying to expand our understanding of how we train.(continued)
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Let them die in combat; they aren’t dying for the country we know & love.
We all knew it would come to this.
Lower and lower the standards until the “right amount” of women can pass.
Like every police and fire department in America.
Too bad our enemies won’t care how sensitive and PC we are.
I was wondering how the Feminazis were going to get around the training rigors. Now we see. Seperate them, then elevate them. What could possibly go wrong?
Separate but more equal: good.
They need to register for selective service as well. Time for them to reap it.
I had to register at 18, so should the ladies.
Myself as well. Enjoy equality ladies.
The Joints Chief of Staff has devolved into just another politically correct government bureaucracy. It is staffed by adept socially climbing careerists and no real line warriors. What warrior’s council that was really concerned about the nations defense would endorse women in combat and homosexuals throughout the ranks?
Only liberal women should be required to register. We conservative women didn’t want this.
I’m mostly the same as you politically, but I registered so now they can too.
P.S. FF VII is awesome.
Every American that dies in combat needs to be revered and remembered for their sacrifice. If the idiots in Washington send a woman she deserves every bit of respect and thanks of the country as a male. To suggest anything else is pure bullshit..
High and tight haircuts, no jewelry or makeup in uniform.
And I didn’t want a Marxist Muslim as POTUS, but here we are.
It will probably take a couple thousand females getting blown up, beheaded, and raped on camera to fix this nonsense. It’s a terrible thought, but probably true.
When will a General or Admiral speak out and resign, as they did in the days of yore?
This has gone way beyond a few stupid decisions.... This clearly is a deliberate subverting of our fighting forces.
If one of those females is MY daughter I will hunt YOU down...
At least we had some hotties in the USAF. Now it’ll be like Ithaca or Berkeley women.
Are you saying me personally, or the enemy soldiers responsible?
They should go with Limbaugh’s All-American First Cavalry Amazon Battalion.
But seriously. This is population control. Thinly disguised.
Take women at their peak fertile years. Draft them. Mandate birth control shots (that will be in there somewhere), give them poor and substandard training and qualifications and then let them get killed or maimed or so psychologically disturbed they never recover.
It’s a win win.
Killing the women is the first thing those interested in genocide or eugenics do. The women have the babies.
Even with all the BS the Inner Party liked to fling (in Orwell’s ‘1984’) even O’Brien admits that they cut the chit when it comes to war-readiness.
But our Big Bro’ has apparently made it doctrine that military training and combat standards will be the same for men and women recruits.
At the same time, they will be different. Doublethink. No, this won’t end well for any troops depending on others in their squad; but in the spirit of doublethink, it will work out fine for those who may not be dependable themselves.
Anyone who thinks drafting MY daughter to get her blown up or raped is my enemy.
The Soviets once thought doing this was a good idea....they very quickly found out it wasn’t.
21st Century Comfort Women???
For sure. That’s what they’ll end up as.
Well I think the blame would fall on those who commit those acts, and those who set our policy. My pointing out what would happen doesn’t make me responsible one bit.
The soviets weren’t obsessed with population control.
Our ‘leaders’ are.
At the very least the years our women would be required to serve would be childfree. Fewer opportunities for them to have babies overall. And sometimes those birth control shots are permanent. Depo is notorious in this regard.
The Draft will probably be back in a few years. I’ll give aid and comfort to any Draft Dodgers that I can.
Our military has turned into a politically correct tool to protect special interests who are pushing the New World Order.
Just remember with all the ‘liberal women will get what they deserve’ chortling you and others are doing on this thread there will be millions of girls who have NOT been raised by feminists and who are NOT feminists who will get killed, raped and maimed as well.
Just because YOU were mistreated and drafted (I am NOT a supporter of the draft for anyone of any chromosomal makeup) doesn’t mean it’s a great idea to mistreat someone else. Especially girls who have been raised to be homemakers and helpmeets for their husbands.
This has always been the liberals biggest failing: They think they know everything, so why have a plan B ready to go in case things fall apart.
lol. Come a shooting war, watch the pregnancy rate, real or imagined, skyrocket in the military!
There won’t be millions of girls drafted. They don’t have to register for selective service. My point was that they don’t want equality, they want the best of everything.(special treatment) Women shouldn’t be allowed in any combat role, let alone SpecOps.
I was never mistreated, nor was I drafted. I said I registered for selective service. I was born in 1975. I voluntarily joined the USAF. I also was never in combat.
that’s not what people are saying.
the point is they are going to die because they are going to get ‘women training’ and that is going to get them killed in combat, and it may mean others get killed because of that. this is not doing women any favors, or the men fighting beside them.
this is pc bullsh1t theater.
Oh I agree with the non combat/spec ops stuff. 100%.
That’s crazy talk. Only way they make that is by scrapping the qualifications. Estrogen doesn’t build muscles or or dense bones like testosterone does.
show me exactly where he said he wanted to draft your daughter and blow her up.
i think your comprehension is a little off tonight. his point was that it will probably take a lot of female casualites for the pc crap to be dropped and get women out of direct combat roles.
are you always taking every discusson as a personal attack? are you just on these threads to pick fights and be argumentative? nobody made it personal but you.
Agreed. There is a reason why men have been soldiers forever and women haven’t.
all wars are population control. and generally they are getting rid of the more patriotic among the population.
look at all the vaccines they pump into them as well. we’ve lost a ton of pilots from bad batches of anthrax vaccines, the synthetic squalene and other crap in there has destroyed their vision and nerve reflexes. depleted uranium dust and exposure has been a nightmare for them as well.
It will probably take a couple thousand females getting blown up, beheaded, and raped on camera to fix this nonsense.
Supports the draft, supports women getting blown up. I have daughters who would be of age for this crazy. How else to take it?
Do you think women in combat is a great idea?
I haven't been on 'these threads' what is it to you if I reply to another poster?
nobody seems to feel awful a guy dies in combat. that’s a lot of futures gone there, too. maybe it’s no big deal because it’s been like this forever and guys are just ‘supposed to’. the guy that gets killed and gets his life cut short, and no family sure wishes people felt as bad as if a woman died in combat.
Men are numerically more expendable than women. It’s one reason Y swimmers are faster. And the male/female birth ratio is greater than 1. Russia lost HALF her men of reproductive age in the great war. Her population growth barely hit a blip in the years after.
The birth rate for a population of 10 men and 100 healthy fertile women is theoretically about 100 babies/year. In a population of 10 women and 100 men it’s roughly 10 babies/year (plus a whole lotta fights!).
Women have the babies. And only women who are healthy and between the years of roughly 14 and 40. Eliminate those citizens or their potential childbearing years via death or simple conscription and your fertility level will plummet.
And we’re just talking simple exclusion and not anything else they might be exposed to via our glorious leaders agendas or corrupt deals with defense or pharma suppliers.
“Pentagon considering affirmative action in combat”
Then the Pentagon is a fool.
The administration is replete with enemies of America, jostling to piss off someone who will eventually revolt against the machine and bring about martial law.
Women are blessings. Men are blessings. Just not blessings in the same way. Maybe that’s why God made them different.
That’s the way it read.
I’ve been disappointed at the number of conservatives who were themselves drafted, hate ‘those bulldyke femists’, and hope they’re drafted and blown up. Just because they were drafted.
I’m against conscription of anyone. Doing it to the liberal women because it was done to ‘you’ (the hypothetical ‘you’) doesn’t make it right.
well that’s very utilitarian of you. glad you aren’ t the God of this universe. yet when you irrationally infer from another poster, that one of your daughters might get blownup, and we have 3 billion other women on the planet, will you take comfort in the fact other women will have the kids she didn’t, or will you instead take it personal and lash out at someone not even talking about your daughter in thefirst place?
oh, you already DID answer my question.