Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

States seek to nullify Obama efforts
Politico ^

Posted on 07/27/2013 2:54:54 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

States seek to nullify Obama efforts By: Tal Kopan July 27, 2013 03:14 PM EDT

Infuriated by what they see as the long arm of Washington reaching into their business, states are increasingly telling the feds: Keep out!

Bills that would negate a variety of federal laws have popped up this year in the vast majority of states - with the amount of anti-federal legislation sharply on the rise during the Obama administration, according to experts.

The “nullification” trend in recent years - which has touched off both fierce battles within the states, and between the states and the feds, as well as raising questions and court battles about whether any of it is legal - has largely focused on three areas: gun control; health care; and national standards for driver’s licenses.

In at least 37 states legislation has been introduced that in some way guts federal gun regulations, according to the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence. The bills were signed into law this spring in two states, Kansas and Alaska, and in two more lawmakers hope to override a governor’s veto. Twenty states since 2010 have passed laws that either opt out of or challenge mandatory parts of Obamacare, the National Conference of State Legislatures says. And half the states have OK’d measures aimed knocking back the Real ID Act of 2005, which dictates Washington’s requirements for issuing driver’s licenses.

“Rosa Parks is the beacon of light: If you say no to something, you can change the world,” Michael Boldin, the Founder of the Tenth Amendment Center, which favors states’ rights, told POLITICO.

“Isn’t that what it’s supposed to be, ‘We, the people?’” he added. “Over the past few years you’ve seen this growing…People are getting sick and tired of federal power.”

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: guncontrol; secondamendment

1 posted on 07/27/2013 2:54:54 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

In the constitution of 1787, the states were not the hydrant for the federal dog.


2 posted on 07/27/2013 3:05:25 PM PDT by Jacquerie (To restore the 10th Amendment, repeal the 17th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Repeal the 17th Amendment.


3 posted on 07/27/2013 3:10:12 PM PDT by DownInFlames
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

10th Amendment

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”


4 posted on 07/27/2013 3:37:00 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Once a Republic, since then a State in the US, but it is Still Texas where I live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DownInFlames

Bump!


5 posted on 07/27/2013 3:37:45 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Once a Republic, since then a State in the US, but it is Still Texas where I live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Under President Wilson, the US was effectively under a coup and one Senator who spoke against WWI was arrested and imprisoned for 10-years, and the president had nearly 200,000 people reporting on their neighbors; while J Edgar Hoover was the enforcer. The US today is undergoing a revolution under a similar democrat president who has just mandated Federal employees report on each other, and if later one of them is arrested then those who failed to report will be held liable - our country will lose it’s civil liberates. The US is basically underpinned in civil liberty via Religion, e.g., the Western Judeo-Christian type, and as the government forces religion out of life and legislates into an illegal practice in both practice and thought, the liberty of everyone will also be gone along with the religion.


6 posted on 07/27/2013 4:11:14 PM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DownInFlames

Plus term limits and a balanced budget amendment.


7 posted on 07/27/2013 4:47:22 PM PDT by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

8 posted on 07/27/2013 5:38:11 PM PDT by 11th_VA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DownInFlames

“...Repeal the 17th Amendment...”
-
That would be a good start.


9 posted on 07/27/2013 5:47:16 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Although Washington’s marijuana law is not popular with many on this forum, the feds have stepped in here just the other day.

A couple who ran a legal dispensary and lived on their boat were kicked off by the feds and the boat confiscated.

I do find it ironic, though, that some of the marijuana advocates have no doubt been big gov voters versus states rights for their lifetime voting history.

I guess they only want states rights when they want what they want.


10 posted on 07/27/2013 5:51:23 PM PDT by angry elephant (Endangered species in Seattle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson