Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz: I stand with Rand Paul against Chris Christie’s attacks
Hotair ^ | 07/29/2013 | AllahPundit

Posted on 07/29/2013 11:47:13 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

He’s light on specifics here about the pros and cons of the NSA program as he sees them, but any time three serious contenders for 2016 are in a scrum over national security and civil liberties, it’s blogworthy. More than that, it’s blogworthy because the Paul/Cruz Senate partnership is to some extent a proxy for the tea-party/libertarian partnership generally. It won’t go on forever, but it’s fascinating while it lasts. I won’t bore you with rehashing why I think Cruz is more a tea partier than a true blue libertarian; read these two posts if you care, or read Nick Gillespie for the libertarian take on why Cruz doesn’t really belong in the movement. Wherever you think Cruz lies on the ideological spectrum, though, he’s a shrewd judge of where his base stands on the issues. And in this case, he’s right in thinking that they Stand With Rand too.

In fact, before you watch the clip below, go back and watch this very short clip of Cruz on “Fox & Friends” in mid-June, after Edward Snowden’s PRISM revelations. He was asked what he thinks of NSA surveillance — and his response was basically noncommittal. He said the program is “cause for concern” but cautioned that we shouldn’t rush to judgment; his main worry about the program seemed to be that Obama might abuse it to target his political enemies. By contrast, Rand Paul had already announced a week before that he hoped to sue the NSA program into oblivion. Why is Cruz firmly with Rand now when he wasn’t before? Could be that the accumulation of leaks about what the feds are doing has finally driven him firmly into the libertarian camp, but the most damaging stuff that Snowden had — the details of government spying on Americans — had already leaked by the time of his F&F appearance. Paul, as I said, had already seen more than enough to demand a class action lawsuit against the feds by that point.

What you’re seeing here, I think, is Cruz executing the opposite of Paul’s 2016 strategy. Paul’s really a doctrinaire libertarian who’s inched towards mainstream righties on some issues (most notably immigration) because he knows he needs a broader coalition to be viable for the nomination. Cruz is really a tea partier who’s inched towards doctrinaire libertarianism on some issues (most notably drones and the NSA) because he recognizes TPers have become more libertarian and because he’s hoping to pick up Paul’s supporters in the primaries if/when he emerges as the right-wing choice against the establishment. It’s a smart strategy. Expect Rubio and Scott Walker to become more libertarian-friendly over the next year or two also. Click the image to watch.

tc1


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: chrischristie; cino; cruz; fino; lino; nsa; paul; randpaul; randsconcerntrolls; rehash; tedcruz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

1 posted on 07/29/2013 11:47:13 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I stand with Rand a hell of a lot more than I will stoop for the Rinos...


2 posted on 07/29/2013 11:49:35 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Cruz/Paul ‘16.


3 posted on 07/29/2013 11:54:55 AM PDT by txhurl ('The DOG ate my homework. That homework, too. ALL my homework. OK?' - POSHITUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Moral clarity. I wonder how it will be received?


4 posted on 07/29/2013 11:55:46 AM PDT by keats5 (Not all of us are hypnotized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

IMO, at the time of the leak, there was not enough info to make rash claims of NSA recklessness. Though, I think everyone with half a brain suspected it. Subsequently, no one has cited a single case where the massive program had stopped a single attack.
I don’t see where Cruz has shaded his conservatism whatsoever. Bob


5 posted on 07/29/2013 11:57:36 AM PDT by alstewartfan ("The atmosphere's too cold in here to attract a butterfly like that." Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; P-Marlowe; jazusamo; Jim Robinson

Hopefully, they’re basing their position on the Constitution and not how the electorate is thinking.

The 4th amendment forbids warrantless searches and seizures.

The 1st amendment forbids abridging the right to petition for redress of grievance....an impossibility with secret courts, secret recordings, and secret meetings.


6 posted on 07/29/2013 12:02:00 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alstewartfan

~ Don’t Stoop for RINOs, Stand with Rand!


7 posted on 07/29/2013 12:03:29 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

I’d LOVE to watch the liberals s**t themselves when these two open up a salvo of a$$-whoopin’ on Hitlery or whoever the Dhimm’s coronate.


8 posted on 07/29/2013 12:03:46 PM PDT by ObozoMustGo2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Cripsy cream, another me me too credit political whore, just using the R label to make himself look more attractive to business instead of utter retard populist liberals... but still a populistas coward in the end.


9 posted on 07/29/2013 12:03:58 PM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

I’ve always said Cruz/Palin...but I would be willing to go with a Cruz/Paul....I would not want Paul to be President, but it might be a means of getting CRUZ in....


10 posted on 07/29/2013 12:05:23 PM PDT by pollywog ("O Thou who changest not, abide with me.".......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: keats5

He doesn’t care about reception.

We are so used to wimpiness. He is not a wimp.


11 posted on 07/29/2013 12:13:17 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I am primarily a Social Conservative and Secondly a National Security one. I did not trust the old wackjob Ron Paul and I do not trust his younger son either. Except for very limited issues (like protecting 2nd Amendment rights), I have little love for Libertarians. It is my belief than Ron Paul’s running in 2012 caused the nomination of Romney...the worst possible candidate (except for Ron Paul). So, although I enjoy Cruz’s spunk, IF he supports Paul...he will not get any support from me.

Now that being said, I dislike the RINO Christy as much or more than Rand Paul. I do not consider him to be Republican - he is some form of Democrat light beer. However, I do not consider Paul to be Republican either...he is a Libertarian and should run for election as such and stay OUT of GOP races.

The ONLY reason I am upset about the NSA scandal, etc. is that President Obama has not used this power to protect national security...he has used it to suppress and spy on conservatives and political foes - an absolute abomination. This is what upsets me - not the power - the abuse of the power.


12 posted on 07/29/2013 12:18:01 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012

There will be much gnashing of teeth, pulling of hair and rending of garments....... the tears of rage and fear will taste like Frangelico or Dubonnet to me...


13 posted on 07/29/2013 12:18:37 PM PDT by txhurl ('The DOG ate my homework. That homework, too. ALL my homework. OK?' - POSHITUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Rand and Cruz are both way better than anything we have had in the recent past.


14 posted on 07/29/2013 12:21:37 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stanne

I know. But I care how the American people will vote.


15 posted on 07/29/2013 12:22:54 PM PDT by keats5 (Not all of us are hypnotized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pollywog
I’ve always said Cruz/Palin...but I would be willing to go with a Cruz/Paul....

Wake up. The 47% won and is growing and the media still supports them. I wish we could get a conservative too but it ain't gonna happen.

16 posted on 07/29/2013 12:24:47 PM PDT by showme_the_Glory (ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: showme_the_Glory

Regardless of the “MSM reported” majority’s liking progressivism, I will be with Cruz, Rand and Palin.

Now to redress and overcome the liberal media, the liberal’s graft, the liberal’s vote buying and the liberal’s vote fraud, regrettably is likely to require re-shuffling the deck and let the liberals have their NE and West coastal empires, while flyover country regains honest common sense government and liberty our Forefathers envisioned.


17 posted on 07/29/2013 12:44:36 PM PDT by X-spurt (Ready for the CRUZ missle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
Hopefully, the GOP will go the way of the dodo bird. It certainly deserves to.

/johnny

18 posted on 07/29/2013 12:45:46 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: keats5

If Americans won’t vote for a strong character who works solely to protect and defend the Constitution, which they have not had a chance to do in 30 yrs there’s not much that a media scmoozer can do to fix that


19 posted on 07/29/2013 12:46:06 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


20 posted on 07/29/2013 1:16:49 PM PDT by dsrtsage (One half of all people have below average IQ. In the US the number is 54%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Go, Ted, go! Get’em!


21 posted on 07/29/2013 2:26:59 PM PDT by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stanne

The Three who may well keep us free are Rand, Cruz and Lee. Let sarah get into the Senate and I will add Palin to the list (maybe in front of the list). Folks, we need more like these in the Senate and House! Let us work hard to fight the macine politics of yore and get more like them in office—it is our only hope to keep from the Obama monarcy in the making. We must unite and place a new wave of people into Washington DC.

What can we do?
1. Find people who are right of center (Tea Party) who are running or planning to run.
2. Support them over RINOs and Old Hat people with no guts.
3. Research them so they are the best we got!
4. Send money, give time, write letters and do all we can to make sure they win!


22 posted on 07/29/2013 2:27:05 PM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

I like Rand, but he seems quirky to me. I love Ted, and I’m glad that he is the type to wait for facts to be gathered before he makes his decisions. If Ted is a RINO, EVERYONE is a RINO.
One thing I don’t like about Rand is the fact that he surgically tears apart the Amoeba’s nominees, then votes FOR them. Ridiculous. Bob


23 posted on 07/29/2013 2:37:49 PM PDT by alstewartfan ("The atmosphere's too cold in here to attract a butterfly like that." Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: txhurl; ObozoMustGo2012
There will be much gnashing of teeth, pulling of hair and rending of garments....... the tears of rage and fear will taste like Frangelico or Dubonnet to me...

Amen!

24 posted on 07/29/2013 2:45:29 PM PDT by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs stay silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

How about one of our GOP governors? They’re solving problems and improving their states. Plus, they have executive experience.


25 posted on 07/29/2013 4:05:52 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Crispy creme is a rino plain and simple!


26 posted on 07/29/2013 4:07:46 PM PDT by ronnie raygun (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Are these “PHONEY POOLS OF BLOOD” where DOJ-supplied weaponry (via Fast and Furious) was used by drug cartels to murder 16 people at a Birthday Party, including 14 children?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2211289/Operation-Fast-Furious-Guns-failed-gun-program-used-2010-Mexico-massacre.html

graphic video:

http://noticias.univision.com/aqui-y-ahora/videos/video/2012-09-30/operacion-rapido-furioso-aqui-ahora-parte-1-masacre-salvarcar?ftloc=homepage1:wcmWidgetUimHomepageStage&ftpos=homepage1:wcmWidgetUimHomepageStage:2

For all their crying about illegal immigrants, the fact is neither Eric Holder nor Barack Obama have any respect for Mexican citizens. LOOK at these pictures and tell me WHO is phoney.


27 posted on 07/29/2013 5:53:25 PM PDT by cookcounty (IRS = Internal Revenge Service.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“I stand with Rand Paul against Christie’s attacks”

Well, better late than never I guess.


28 posted on 07/29/2013 6:34:24 PM PDT by In Another Time... (..In another place...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txhurl
Not that i think ahead.....but...cruz/palin will last for 16 yrs...

We may stand a chance as a Republic

29 posted on 07/29/2013 6:47:25 PM PDT by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

Now we are talking. Had to tweet this one...


30 posted on 07/29/2013 8:20:09 PM PDT by techworker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I don’t think Rand Paul would be a strong nominee; I question whether he can even be reelected in KY in 2016.


31 posted on 07/29/2013 9:28:49 PM PDT by Theodore R. (The grand poo-bahs have spoken: "It's Jebbie's turn!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade
Old Hat people with no guts.

Sounds ike nearly all of them

32 posted on 07/29/2013 9:30:19 PM PDT by Theodore R. (The grand poo-bahs have spoken: "It's Jebbie's turn!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Cruz is no RINO!


33 posted on 07/29/2013 9:35:59 PM PDT by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Although I am an interventionist, rather than an isolationist--and therefore, in this matter, much closer to the foreign-policy views of Chris Christie than I am to the foreign-policy views of Rand Paul--I believe this outburst by the former was entirely unnecessary.

Moreover, it seems part and parcel of a pattern, dating back to Christie's embrace of President Obama last fall (just prior to the presidential election) and his trashing of congressional Republicans, just a little later.

All in all, I believe Rand Paul comes out looking okay after this little dustup, whereas Chris Christie appears a bit churlish...

34 posted on 07/29/2013 9:37:30 PM PDT by AmericanExceptionalist (Democrats believe in discussing the full spectrum of ideas, all the way from far left to center-left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
"Rand and Cruz are both way better than anything we have had in the recent past."

The Senate is sure benefiting from greater diversity....

35 posted on 07/29/2013 10:05:12 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt
I stand with you. And to those who like to predict the future, DON'T. DON'T tell us to “wake up” and that we're not going to get this or that. It is up to US to make things happen, to fight, to strategize, to join forces, to work towards our goals.

Thank God for Cruz, Rand Paul, Palin, Mike Lee, Louie Ghomert, to name a few Conservatives out there. Let's work with them for US, the USA.

36 posted on 07/29/2013 10:54:22 PM PDT by itssme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
This is what upsets me - not the power - the abuse of the power.

To me, the whole idea behind America is that you limit the government's power so that the damage which can be done by the corrupt and incompetent is also limited.

Giving power to government and trusting that it will only be used for good purposes by wise and freedom-loving men is a dangerous delusion.

37 posted on 07/30/2013 5:21:47 AM PDT by Notary Sojac (I call it messin' with the kid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun
Dear Gov. Christie:

I guess your idea of fighting terrorism is cataloging Facebook posts at home, and pissing away lives/treasure in decades of futile nation building abroad.

In that case, I suggest you shut up. And the next time you feel inclined to slander freedom-loving Americans, why don't you go have dinner at Golden Corral with Michael Moore, or something else you'd find equally enjoyable.

38 posted on 07/30/2013 5:26:00 AM PDT by Notary Sojac (I call it messin' with the kid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

If I might ask, in your break-down of social then security, where does the Constitution come in? From your statement, in re: to the NSA usage, I’m presume after security?

So, for Rand (as Paul is RIGHT out for ya), whom seems to (currently) solidly voice/vote 90+% Constitutional, you’d more cut off your nose for spite?! Then cast the same aspirations upon those whom he would associate?

Boy, if us (L) are ‘wacky’, I don’t know what (some) ‘Conservatives’ can be labeled...


39 posted on 07/30/2013 5:27:55 AM PDT by i_robot73 (We hold that all individuals have the Right to exercise sole dominion over their own lives - LP.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac
I guess your idea of fighting terrorism is cataloging Facebook posts at home, and pissing away lives/treasure in decades of futile nation building abroad.

I see that attitude on display in miniature every time I go through an airport security line: kid glove treatment for obvious Muzzies least they feel offended about being "profiled"; third degree for random citizens right up to an including explosives tests on a paperback set of C.S. Lewis books which I recently got caught trying to smuggle on-board in my carry-on luggage. I kid you not.

40 posted on 07/30/2013 7:19:20 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Cruz would make a great president as well as a great looking president.

Nice pic.


41 posted on 07/30/2013 1:17:50 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73

“where does the Constitution come in?”

Libertarians DO NOT correctly interpret original intent of the Founders on many moral/social issues. They mostly get the 2nd Amendment right...but little else.

No, I do NOT trust anyone with “primarily” Libertarian views to hold office much more than I do a liberal democrat. The Paul’s (father and son) are LIBERTARIANS not Republicans.


42 posted on 07/30/2013 7:27:23 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac

“Giving power to government and trusting that it will only be used for good purposes by wise and freedom-loving men is a dangerous delusion.’

ANY government is giving up some freedoms to protect other things. All government is a risk. However, anarchy IS NOT an option.

So, I am willing to take a calculated risk in giving certain powers to those in charge....but safeguards need to be in place.


43 posted on 07/30/2013 7:30:26 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: FReepers; Patriots; FRiends

SENATOR TED CRUZ ROCKS!






Free Republic is Our Beacon of Truth.
FReepers post articles 24/7 to keep All of Us informed.
Likewise, it takes All of Us to keep FR on the air!
Please Make your Donation today!

What would you do without Free Republic?


44 posted on 07/30/2013 7:31:40 PM PDT by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
This is what upsets me - not the power - the abuse of the power.

If the government didn't have that power in the first place, they couldn't abuse it.
45 posted on 07/30/2013 11:23:24 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

We the People already gave up certain Freedoms/Liberty when the Constitution was created. I don’t recall giving further consent, per C. Amendment, to strip away our 4th A. Rights. I sure as sh!t didn’t give the authority to any 3rd party.

Yet, with the NSA, TSA, etc., no recent terrorism threat/act was prevented *BY* gov’t. Even in your ‘best case scenario’, you’re calculated risk has been for naught.

For someone who believes us (L) cannot interpret the Constitution per the Founders (which one(s), I can not be certain you are referring), I think this one here can read and understand the 4th quite well, thank you very much. To brutalize Washington, I’m not adding any more wood to the fire ‘master’; in fact, the flames are too big already.


46 posted on 07/31/2013 5:28:30 AM PDT by i_robot73 (We hold that all individuals have the Right to exercise sole dominion over their own lives - LP.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas; All

One of the strengths of the liberals is ... they are united, no matter what. Conservatives/Republicans, are divided. Each believes in what they have decided will benefit them personally. The people are left with no desirable candidate and direction available.

Sarah is the only one that makes sense and I trust. Only she may not run. MBF says the powers that be in the Republic party told her they would not support her ... which is why she announced the decision not to run. Maybe so, maybe No. We do see she is attacked, blocked, ridiculed, constantly on going.

As for me and my house we will seek God and pray for the will of God. Woe unto those that do evil, intend evil, and spread evil. God gives the people what we declare we want.

(IE when God’s people wanted a King like the other peoples had. God warned them of the tyranny of a KING.)

We never seem to learn. God have mercy on America.

MBF —my best friend


47 posted on 07/31/2013 9:11:30 AM PDT by geologist ("If you love me, keep my commands" .... John 14 :15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: geologist

“Sarah is the only one that makes sense and I trust.”

I pretty much agree that Palin is the best possible...because I believe she is a balanced conservative...of course I could be wrong. She is certainly a better pick than Ryan ANY day.

I have reached the point where I do not really trust any politicians anymore. So, I would describe Sarah as being the one I least distrust. :-)


48 posted on 07/31/2013 3:59:42 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73

“I don’t recall giving further consent, per C. Amendment, to strip away our 4th A. Rights.’

The Fourth Amendment pretty much disappeared when “no-knock” warrants were allowed by the SCOTUS.

Whatever...even IF Paul understands the 4th and 2nd Amendments...he doesn’t get much else right. He is too hit and miss - as are all libertarians. Libertarians (libertines), to include Paul, do NOT correctly understand most of the original intent of the COTUS...except for the really obvious.


49 posted on 07/31/2013 4:05:29 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

I’ll give you that on the no-knock...The whole failed, and ILLEGAL, War on Drugs has really taken our Rights for a loop.

Maybe you can learn me something then on where us (L) ‘get it wrong’? WHO’s ‘intent’, and where/what, are we ‘off’, IYHO?


50 posted on 08/01/2013 10:04:27 AM PDT by i_robot73 (We hold that all individuals have the Right to exercise sole dominion over their own lives - LP.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson